green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
1.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2009 · 2 courts ·
…except as limited by the constitution its power is plenary
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Limited
France v. East Central Bossier Fire Protection District No. 1
except as limited by the constitution its power is plenary
discussed
Limited
France v. EAST CENT. BOSSIER FIRE PROTECT.
except as limited by the constitution its power is plenary
discussed
Limited
Bd. of Dir. of La. Recovery Dist. v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners, and Citizens of State
except as limited by the constitution its power is plenary
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Alayne B. Adams (87-5388), Mayo L. Coiner (87-5424)
it has long been settled that the question of materiality in a penury or false statement case is one of law for the courts to decide.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bremers
See United States v. Mitchell, 588 F.2d 481, 483 (5th Cir.) (“Because the interstate element is only included to provide a constitutional basis for the exercise of federal jurisdiction, it is not necessary to show actual knowledge by [the defendant] of the interstate transportation of the security.”), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 940 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re M&M Transportation Co.
See generally Nachman Corp. v. PBGC, 592 F.2d 947 , 951 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 940 , 99 S.Ct. 2881 , 61 L.Ed.2d 309 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Marshall
See Nachman v. PBGC, 592 F.2d 947 , 954-56 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. granted, 442 U.S. 940 , 99 S.Ct. 2881 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979) (concluding that the term nonforfeitable is identical with the term vested).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Anderson
See also United States v. Giacalone, 587 F. 2d 5, 6-7 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 940 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 310 (1979), in which the court said, in a case involving perjury before a grand jury, that it "has long been settled that the question of materiality in a perjury or false statement case is one of law for the courts to decide * * *.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mitchell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-1486.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 1979.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.