green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Gill
See Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Nadler, 445 N.W.2d 358 , 361 n. 3 (Iowa 1989) (vagueness challenge to EC 9-6); Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Durham, 279 N.W.2d 280, 283-84 (Iowa 1979) (vagueness challenge to EC 1-5, EC 9-6, and DR 1-102(A)(6); Behnke, 276 N.W.2d at 843 , appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. at 805, 100 S.Ct. at 27, 62 L.Ed.2d at 19 (vagueness challenge to former version of EC 5-5).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abreu v. Callahan
See also Letourneau v. Califano, 453 F.Supp. 636, 638 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (three judge court) ("only minimal scrutiny is to he given federal statutory distinctions involving aliens”), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 805 , 100 S.Ct. 26 , 62 L.Ed.2d 18 (1979). 74 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Getscher
See, e.g., Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct v. Behnke, 276 N.W.2d 838, 840 (Iowa), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 805 , 100 S.Ct. 27 , 62 L.Ed.2d 19 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hinkle
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 79-5099.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.