green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.9 score
“state-law prohibition against compliance with the district court's decree cannot survive the command of the supremacy clause of the united states constitution.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oregon Advocacy Center v. Mink
state-law prohibition against compliance with the district court's decree cannot survive the command of the supremacy clause of the united states constitution.
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbus-America Discovery Group v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
(2×)
See Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assoc., 443 U.S. 658 , 693 n. 32, 99 S.Ct. 3055 , 61 L.Ed.2d 823 , modified, Washington v. United States, 444 U.S. 816 , 100 S.Ct. 34 , 62 L.Ed.2d 24 (1979) ("[A] court possessed of the res in a proceeding in rem ... may enjoin those who would interfere with that custody.''); Marex International, Inc. v. Unidentified, Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel, 952 *303 F.Supp. 825, 829-30 (S.D.Ga.1997) (granting salvor exclusive rights to salvage wreck and enjoining all third parties from interfering with those rights); United States v.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbus-America Discovery Group v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company
See Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assoc., 443 U.S. 658 , 693 n.32, modified, Washington v. United States, 444 U.S. 816 (1979) ("[A] court possessed of the res in a proceeding in rem . . . may enjoin those who would interfere with that custody."); Marex International, Inc. v. Unidentified, Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel, 952 F. Supp. 825, 829-30 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, Daniel Little Axe, Governor v. The State of Kansas
(2×)
See Washington v. United States, 444 U.S. 816 , 100 S.Ct. 34 , 62 L.Ed.2d 24 (1979) (mem.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. State of Oregon and State of Washington, and Confederated Tribes of the Warm Spring Reservation, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees
(2×)
See Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass’n, 443 U.S. 658 , 99 S.Ct. 3055 , 61 L.Ed.2d 823 , modified on other grounds, 444 U.S. 816 , 100 S.Ct. 34 , 62 L.Ed.2d 24 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herrera v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Washington v. Washington Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass’n, 443 U.S. 658, 674-679 , 99 S.Ct. 3055, 3068-71 , 61 L.Ed.2d 823 (1979), modified on other grounds, 444 U.S. 816 , 100 S.Ct. 34 , 62 L.Ed.2d 24 (1979); Choctaw Nation, 318 U.S. at 431-32 , 63 S.Ct. at 677-78 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South Dakota v. Bourland
(2×)
In determining the scope of the Tribe’s regulatory power over this land, we must use the approach followed by the Supreme Court and by our Court in Lower Brule: tribal rights are abrogated only if Congress “has clearly expressed its intent to do so,” keeping in mind that “doubtful expressions of intent must be resolved in favor of the Indians.” Lower Brule, 711 F.2d at 827 ; see also Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass’n., 443 U.S. 658, 690 , 99 S.Ct. 3055, 3077 , 61 L.Ed.2d 823 (1979) (“[ajbsent explicit statutory language, we have been extreme…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of South Dakota in Its Own Behalf, and as Parens Patriae v. Gregg Bourland, Personally and as Chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Dennis Rousseau, Personally and as Director of Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Game, Fish and Parks, State of South Dakota in Its Own Behalf, and as Parens Patriae v. Gregg Bourland, Personally and as Chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Dennis Rousseau, Personally and as Director of Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Game, Fish and Parks
(2×)
In determining the scope of the Tribe's regulatory power over this land, we must use the approach followed by the Supreme Court and by our Court in Lower Brule: tribal rights are abrogated only if Congress "has clearly expressed its intent to do so," keeping in mind that "doubtful expressions of intent must be resolved in favor of the Indians." Lower Brule, 711 F.2d at 827 ; see also Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n., 443 U.S. 658, 690 , 99 S.Ct. 3055, 3077 , 61 L.Ed.2d 823 (1979) ("[a]bsent explicit statutory language, we have been extremely reluctant t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Save Our Dunes v. Pegues
(2×)
See also Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 , 692 n. 32, 99 S.Ct. 3055 , 3078 n. 32, 61 L.Ed.2d 823 , modified on other grounds, 444 U.S. 816 , 100 S.Ct. 34 , 62 L.Ed.2d 24 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Disbarment of Olitt
No. D-153.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Cited by 33 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (4) · D. Oregon (1)
Disbarment entered.