Reilly v. United States, 444 U.S. 903 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Reilly v. United States, 444 U.S. 903 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
93 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Raimey v. Wright National Flood Insurance (nyed, 2014-12-31) · Strongest negative: United States v. Richard A. Horn (ca1, 1994-07-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Richard A. Horn
1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: but see · confidence high
See United States v. Baker, 603 F.2d 759, 761-62 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (entertaining government appeal, under section 1291, from district court's Rule 15(c) assessment against government of deposition-related attorneys’ fees); United States v. Rogalsky, 575 F.2d 457, 459 (3d Cir.1978) (entertaining government appeal, under section 1291, from district court's assessment against government of costs arising from psychiatric examination of indigent defendant, see 18 U.S.C. § 3006A); but see In re Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir.) (holding that contempt fine for discovery abuse a…
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Horn
1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: but see · confidence high
See United States v. Baker, 603 F.2d 759, 761-62 (9th Cir. 1979) (per curiam) (entertaining government appeal, under section 1291, from district court's Rule 15(c) assessment against government of deposition-related attorneys' fees); United States v. Rogalsky, 575 F.2d 457, 459 (3d Cir. 1978) (entertaining government appeal, under section 1291, from district court's assessment against government of costs arising from psychiatric examination of indigent defendant, see 18 U.S.C. 3006A); but see In re Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir.) (holding that contempt fine for discovery abuse agai…
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Horn
1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: but see · confidence high
See United States v. Baker, 603 F.2d ___ _____________ _____ 759, 761-62 (9th Cir. 1979) (per curiam) (entertaining government appeal, under section 1291, from district court's Rule 15(c) assessment against government of deposition-related attorneys' fees); United States v. Rogalsky, 575 F.2d 457, 459 (3d Cir. _____________ ________ 1978) (entertaining government appeal, under section 1291, from district court's assessment against government of costs arising from psychiatric examination of indigent defendant, see 18 U.S.C. ___ 3006A); but see In re Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58, 61 (2d ___ ___…
discussed Cited "but see" Response to Congressional Requests for Information Regarding Decisions Made Under the Independent Counsel Act
OLC · 1986 · signal: but see · confidence high
See Cates v. LTV Aerospace Corp., 480 F.2d 620, 622 (5th Cir. 1973); C arr v. Monroe Manufacturing Co., 431 F.2d 384 , 387 (5th Cir. 1970), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 1000 (1971); but see In re the Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58, 62 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 903 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Raimey v. Wright National Flood Insurance
E.D.N.Y · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Attorney General of United States, 596 F.2d 58, 65-66 (2d Cir.1979) (evidentiary or issue-related sanctions should be considered before holding the Attorney General in contempt), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979); Wahad v. F.B.I., 813 F.Supp. 224, 227-28 (S.D.N.Y.1993) (imposing “issue-related” sanctions under Rule 37(b), specifically the establishment of facts for the purposes of the action, on the government defendants for failing to obey discovery orders); National Lawyers Guild v. Attorney General, 94 F.R.D. 600, 615 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (“Rule 37…
cited Cited "see" Wahad v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58, 67 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979).
cited Cited "see" Solis v. Walker
S.D.N.Y. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re United States, 565 F.2d 19 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Corporacion Insular de Seguros v. Garcia
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Attorney General of the United States, 596 F.2d 58, 62 (2d Cir.) (refusing to extend the Nixon exception to the Attorney General), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979). 2 Thus, we dismiss the appeals of Aponte and Rodriguez for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
discussed Cited "see" Corporacion Insular De Seguros v. Hon. Juan Antonio Garcia, Appeal of Dr. Juan B. Aponte. Corporacion Insular De Seguros v. Hon. Juan Antonio Garcia, Appeal of Oscar Rodriguez. Corporacion Insular De Seguros v. Hon. Juan Antonio Garcia, Appeal of Hon. Miguel A. Hernandez-Agosto
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Attorney General of the United States, 596 F.2d 58, 62 (2d Cir.) (refusing to extend the Nixon exception to the Attorney General), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979). 2 14 Thus, we dismiss the appeals of Aponte and Rodriguez for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
discussed Cited "see" Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of Energy
D.C. Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, In re Attorney Gen. of the United States, 596 F.2d 58, 61-62 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979); Southern Ry. v. Lanham, 403 F.2d 119, 124 (5th Cir.1968); SEC v. Naftalin, 460 F.2d 471, 475 (8th Cir1972).
cited Cited "see" A. Illum Hansen, Inc. v. Tiana Queen Motel, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Attorney General of the United States, 596 F.2d 58, 62-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979).
cited Cited "see" In Re Tiana Queen Motel, Inc., Todem Homes, Inc., Anthony Demarco, Debtors. A. Illum Hansen, Inc. v. Tiana Queen Motel, Inc., Todem Homes, Inc., Anthony Demarco, Defendants- in Re Petition for Writ of Mandamus. A. Illum Hansen, Inc., Stanley Weisz, Phyllis H. Weisz and Stanley Weisz, P.C. Retirement Plan v. Anthony Demarco
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Attorney General of the United States, 596 F.2d 58, 62-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Joseph Morano
11th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
The district judge apparently admitted this evidence because it was relevant to the existence of a common plan between Morano and Ottomonelli, Fed.R.Evid. 402; see United States v. Jimenez, 600 F.2d 1172, 1173 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 216 , 62 L.Ed.2d 140 (1979), and because its relevancy was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to Morano.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Anthony
R.I. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reilly, 456 F.Supp. 211, 219 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff’d 601 F.2d 577 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 216 , 62 L.Ed.2d 140 (1979) (because of importance of allowing defendant to bring out the full extent of the immunity agreement, court refrained from placing any restrictions on cross-examination of key government witness in this area); Holt v. State, 378 So.2d 106 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1980) (trial court should not have precluded defense counsel’s inquiry on cross-examination regarding details surrounding grant of immunity to primary prosecution witness); State …
discussed Cited "see" In Re UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, James PECK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir.) (“Socialist Workers Party”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979); In re United States, 565 F.2d 19 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 3082 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Alliance to End Repression v. City of Chicago
N.D. Ill. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Herman v. Krezdorn
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jimenez, 600 F.2d 1172, 1173 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 216 , 62 L.Ed.2d 140 (1979).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Harrod
D.C. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally In re Attorney General of the United States, 596 F.2d 58, 62-64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979); 16 C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Joel Seminole
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
If the “fine” was actually an order for reimbursement of fees paid to Seminole’s court appointed counsel, the district court erred by not making the requisite finding that “funds are available for payment” of the fees. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(f) (1982); see also United States v. Jimenez, 600 F.2d 1172, 1174 (5th Cir.) (section 3006A(f) requires a finding that the defendant is currently able to repay fees), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 216 , 62 L.Ed.2d 140 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Frederick R. Weisman, Sachiko T. Bower v. Frederick R. Weisman, Frederick Weisman Co., and Rare Properties, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Attorney General of the United States, 596 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979); UAW v. National Caucus of Labor Committees, 525 F.2d 323, 324-25 (2d Cir.1975); Baker v. United States Steel Corporation, 492 F.2d 1074, 1077 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Steven Wayne Tyler
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Santarpio, 560 F.2d 448, 455 (1st Cir.) (this authority embraces an order requiring the defendant to repay attorney's fees generated by his court-appointed counsel), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 609 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977) with United States v. Jimenez, 600 F.2d 1172, 1174-75 (5th Cir.) (reaching opposite result), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 216 , 62 L.Ed.2d 140 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pulliam v. Allen (2×)
SCOTUS · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Attorney General of the United States, 596 F. 2d 58 (CA2) (writ of mandamus granted to vacate District Court’s contempt order against the Attorney General), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 903 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio)
SCOTUS · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Socialist Workers Party v. Attorney General, 458 F. Supp. 895, 904 (SDNY 1978) (FBI interference with SWP travel arrangements and speaker hall rental), vacated on other grounds, 596 F. 2d 58 (CA2), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 903 (1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Rocco J. Demasi, M.D., the 96 Other Subpoenaed Witnesses Identified in Exhibit a Hereto, Gary Ardison, M.D., Thomas L. Bauer, M.D., Ivan L. Butler, M.D., S. W. Deisher, M.D., Jack A. Kline, M.D., Lois Kushner, M.D., S. Philip Laucks, M.D., Harold H. MacDougall M.D., Iain L. McKenzie M.D., John P. Whiteley, M.D., the York Hospital, and the Medical and Dental Staff of the York Hospital, No. 81-2171 v. Malcolm Weiss, and Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Nominal Gary Ardison, M.D., Thomas L. Bauer, M.D., Ivan L. Butler, M.D., S. W. Deisher, M.D., Jack A. Kline, M.D., Lois Kushner, M.D., S. Philip Laucks, M.D., Harold H. MacDougall M.D., Iain L. McKenzie M.D., John P. Whiteley, M.D., the York Hospital, and the Medical and Dental Staff of the York Hospital, No. 81-2192 v. Malcolm Weiss, Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Nominal
3rd Cir. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cromaglass Corp. v. Ferm, 500 F.2d 601, 604 (3d Cir. 1974) (in banc); see also In re Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." DeMasi v. Weiss
3rd Cir. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cromaglass Corp. v. Ferm, 500 F.2d 601, 604 (3d Cir. 1974) (in banc); see also In re Attorney General, 596 F.2d 58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 653, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,614, 7 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1578 Bobby L. Branch v. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Movant-Appellant
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., In re Attorney General of United States, 596 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979) (refusing to extend Nixon exception to Attorney General); North Carolina Ass'n of Black Lawyers v. North Carolina Board of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547 (4th Cir. 1976) (refusing to extend Cohen exception beyond claims of true privilege). 13 However, before Ryan was decided in 1971, this circuit carved out another exception allowing immediate appeal by the government when it was not a party to the action and was asserting some governmental privilege.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Branch v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., In re Attorney General of United States, 596 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 217 , 62 L.Ed.2d 141 (1979) (refusing to extend Nixon exception to Attorney General); North Carolina Ass’n of Black Lawyers v. North Carolina Board of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547 (4th Cir. 1976) (refusing to extend Cohen exception beyond claims of true privilege).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reilly
v.
United States
No. 79-5322.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1979.
444 U.S. 903
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.