green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pedro L. Gochicoa v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
(2×)
Furthermore, the prosecutor’s use of the hearsay evidence did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct; the hearsay statements, once admitted in evidence without objection, were a proper subject of the prosecutor’s closing argument. 7 Lopez v. State, 632 S.W.2d 709, 713 (Tex.App.1982, no writ); see also Lacoste v. Blackburn, 592 F.2d 1321, 1325 (5th Cir.) (finding no prosecutorial misconduct under Dutton test where prosecutor joined court in admonishing testifying officer to omit reference to substance of confidential tip), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 968 , 100 S.Ct. 458 , 62 L.Ed.2d 381 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., People v. Estrada, 68 Ill.App.3d 272 , 24 Ill.Dec. 924, 929-30 , 386 N.E.2d 128, 133-34 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 968 , 100 S.Ct. 459 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Walton
(2×)
See e.g., State v. Cole, 286 Or 411 , 595 P2d 466 , cert den 444 US 968 (1979) (trial judge taken seriously ill and confined to hospital).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Duvall
See also State v. Vega, 40 N.C.App. 326 , 253 S.E.2d 94 , disc. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 457 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 968 , 100 S.Ct. 459 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 (1979); Cox, supra. Defendant contends that certain comments made by the judge in the presence of the jury and his refusal to recess upon defendant's motion illustrate Judge Brown's actual prejudice toward defendant and created an unfavorable atmosphere during the course of the trial.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pedro L. GOCHICOA v. Gary L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
Furthermore, the prosecutor's use of the hearsay evidence did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct; the hearsay statements, once admitted in evidence without objection, were a proper subject of the prosecutor's closing argument.7 Lopez v. State, 632 S.W.2d 709, 713 (Tex.App.1982, no writ); see also Lacoste v. Blackburn, 592 F.2d 1321, 1325 (5th Cir.) (finding no prosecutorial misconduct under Dutton test where prosecutor joined court in admonishing testifying officer to omit reference to substance of confidential tip), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 968 , 100 S.Ct. 458 , 62 L.Ed.2d 381 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pedro L. GOCHICOA v. Gary L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
Furthermore, the prosecutor's use of the hearsay evidence did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct; the hearsay statements, once admitted in evidence without objection, were a proper subject of the prosecutor's closing argument.7 Lopez v. State, 632 S.W.2d 709, 713 (Tex.App.1982, no writ); see also Lacoste v. Blackburn, 592 F.2d 1321, 1325 (5th Cir.) (finding no prosecutorial misconduct under Dutton test where prosecutor joined court in admonishing testifying officer to omit reference to substance of confidential tip), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 968 , 100 S.Ct. 458 , 62 L.Ed.2d 381 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Such
v.
Wolff, Prisons Director
v.
Wolff, Prisons Director
No. 79-5040.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1979.
Published
Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.