green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“the singling out for such civil penalties of particular conduct, especially conduct in the economic sphere, raises no question under the equal protection guarantees unless, perchance the selection was bereft of a plausible reason.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allgeyer v. Lincoln
the singling out for such civil penalties of particular conduct, especially conduct in the economic sphere, raises no question under the equal protection guarantees unless, perchance the selection was bereft of a plausible reason.
cited
Cited "see"
Hard Candy, LLC v. Hard Candy Fitness, LLC
See Enic, 870 So.2d at 891 (citing Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd., 628 F.2d 1175, 1177 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 604 (1980)); Am.
cited
Cited "see"
Boyer v. Trustees of Indiana University (In re Fort Wayne Telsat, Inc.)
See In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., 632 F.2d 955 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Banco Continental, SA v. TRANSCOM BANK
See Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd., 628 F.2d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 604 *401 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Del Grosso
See In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., 632 F.2d 955 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc. (In Re Texaco, Inc.)
Accord Barry v. Smith (In re New York, New Haven and Hartford R.R.), 632 F.2d 955 , 959 n. 2 (2d Cir.) (dictum), cert. denied sub nom., Barry v. American Financial Enter., Inc. 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Huang v. Sentinel Government Securities
See Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd., 628 F.2d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.) (no alter ego or agency relationship where parent and subsidiary acted as “distinct corporate entities”), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 604 (1980); Bellomo v. Pennsylvania Life Co., 488 F.Supp. 744, 746 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (Where a holding company acts as a mere “investment mechanism ... the subsidiaries conduct business not as its agents but as its investments.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Omega Homes, Inc. v. Citicorp Acceptance Co.
See Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd., 628 F.2d 1175, 1177 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 604 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Taylor
See A Juvenile v. Commonwealth (No. 2), 381 Mass. 379 , 383 n.5, cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1062 (1980) (explaining Silva and Funches).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Quest Medical, Inc. v. Apprill
See also Barry v. Smith (In re New York, N.H. & H.R.R.), 632 F.2d 955, 962-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smoky Mountain Secrets, Inc. v. United States
See also United States v. Besase, 623 F.2d 463, 465 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jemez Agency, Inc. v. Cigna Corp.
See also Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd., 628 F.2d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.) (fact that some officers and directors employed by both parent and subsidiary insufficient to justify assertion of jurisdiction over parent holding company), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 604 (1980); Scott, 107 N.M. at 121-22 , 753 P.2d at 900-01 (“[t]hat the corporations have common officers and directors, or both, is not sufficient by itself to render a parent liable....”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Globe Transport & Trading Ltd. v. Guthrie Latex, Inc.
Misco, 108 S.Ct. at 371 . “[A]s long as the arbitrator is even arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority, that a court is convinced he committed serious error does not suffice to overturn his decision.” Id.; see also Brady v. Form-Eze Systems, Inc., 623 F.2d 261, 264 (2d *44 Cir.1980) (“it is well established that arbitrators are not required to disclose the basis upon which their awards are made ... we are bound by the interpretation of the instrument so long as it is barely color-able.”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Company, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd.
Supra at 1409, 1410-11; see also Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd., 628 F.2d 1175, 1177 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 604 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendell v. Greenberg
See, e.g., In re New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co. v. Smith, 632 F.2d 955, 962-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980); Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. v. Tiger International, Inc., 600 F.2d 355, 361-62 (2d Cir.1979); Pavlidis v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., 737 F.2d 1227, 1234 (1st Cir.1984); South Coast Services Corp. v. Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Co., 669 F.2d 1265, 1271 (9th Cir.1982); Gerrity v. Chapin, [1979-80 Transfer Binder] Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett Waites Corp. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
Glaros, 628 F.2d at 682 ; see also Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd., 628 F.2d 1175, 1178 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 604 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Toyota Motor Corp.
See, e.g., Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd., 628 F.2d 1175 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 785 , 66 L.Ed.2d 604 (1980); O.S.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alaska National Bank
Compare Barry v. Smith (In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad), 632 F.2d 955, 960 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Walsh Construction, Inc., Bankrupt. United States of America v. Alaska National Bank of the North and Paul Burlingame, Trustee, in the Matter of Cecilia Ruth Walsh, Gerald Patrick Walsh, D/B/A Beaver Builders, Bankrupts. United States of America v. Alaska National Bank of the North and Paul Burlingame, Trustee
Compare Barry v. Smith (In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad), 632 F.2d 955 , 960 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980). 11 The bankruptcy court amply considered the various factors that determine the reasonableness of the compromise.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kramer Motors, Inc.
v.
British Leyland, Ltd.
v.
British Leyland, Ltd.
No. 80-588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1980.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of New Hampshire (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.