green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1989 ·
…as is clear from the language of the rule, it is applicable to situations in which a class of plaintiffs seeks injunctive relief against a single defendant-the party opposing the class-who has acted on grounds generally applicable to the plaintiff class
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Luyando v. Bowen
(2×)
as is clear from the language of the rule, it is applicable to situations in which a class of plaintiffs seeks injunctive relief against a single defendant-the party opposing the class-who has acted on grounds generally applicable to the plaintiff class
discussed
Cited "see"
Leer v. Washington Education Ass'n
(2×)
See Paxman v. Campbell, 612 F.2d 848, 854 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1129 , 101 S.Ct. 951 , 67 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Thompson v. Board of Educ. of Romeo Community Schools, 709 F.2d 1200, 1203-04 (6th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley Mills Stanert
(2×)
See United States v. Willis, 633 F.2d 930 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1129 , 101 S.Ct. 950 , 67 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981) (affiant stated that based on his personal experiences of seven and a half years as a drug agent, he knew ether was a necessary precursor in the manufacture of amphetamines); United States v. Park, 531 F.2d 754 (5th Cir.1976) (smell of ether supported probable cause to believe that suspect was illegally manufacturing drugs).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Corgain v. H.G. Miller and Norman Carlson, Joe Ortega v. H.G. Miller, Warden and Norman Carlson, Arthur St. Peter v. H.G. Miller, Warden, Kenneth Duane Agtuca v. Harold G. Miller, Anthony J. Souza v. Harold Miller, Warden, Ronald Orville Piercy v. Harold G. Miller, Albert Little v. Harold G. Miller, Warden, Lester M. Askofu Johnson v. H.G. Miller
(2×)
See Ali v. Gibson, 631 F.2d 1126, 1134-35 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1129 , 101 S.Ct. 951 , 67 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981) (territorial to federal system); Sisbarro v. Warden, supra, 592 F.2d at 3 (state to federal system); Fletcher v. Warden, 467 F.Supp. 777, 779 (D.Kan.1979), remanded for dismissal as moot, 641 F.2d 850 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981) (state to federal system); Dozier v. Hilton, 507 F.Supp. 1299, 1307-08 (D.N.J.1981) (state to state transfer); Shakur v. Bell, 447 F.Supp. 958, 960 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (state to state transfer)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Corgain v. Miller
(2×)
See Ali v. Gibson, 631 F.2d 1126 , 1134-35 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1129 , 101 S.Ct. 951 , 67 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981) (territorial to federal system); Sisbarro v. Warden, supra, 592 F.2d at 3 (state to federal system); Fletcher v. Warden, 467 F.Supp. 777, 779 (D.Kan. 1979), remanded for dismissal as moot, 641 F.2d 850 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981) (state to federal system); Dozier v. Hilton, 507 F.Supp. 1299, 1307-08 (D.N.J. 1981) (state to state transfer); Shakur v. Bell, 447 F.Supp. 958, 960 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (state to state transf…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Witwer
(2×)
See United States v. Willis, 633 F.2d 930, 932 (10th Cir. 1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1129 , 101 S.Ct. 950 , 67 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara S. Clanton v. Orleans Parish School Board
See Paxman v. Campbell, 612 F.2d 848, 856 (4th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 951 , 67 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); cf. Shirley v. Chagrin Falls Board of Education, 521 F.2d 1329, 1334 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1111 , 47 L.Ed.2d 317 (1976) (defense of qualified immunity is available in context of backpay action since “where the action is against the individual members of the Board, it is in effect an action for damages, whether it is styled as such or not”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Nutt
See, e.g., Werneth v Idaho, 449 US 1129, 1129-1130 ; 101 S Ct 951 ; 67 L Ed 2d 118 (1981) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Brown v Ohio, 432 US 161, 170 ; 97 S Ct 2221 ; 53 L Ed 2d 187 (1977) (Brennan, J., concurring); Ashe v Swenson, 397 US 436, 448-460 ; 90 S Ct 1189 ; 25 L Ed 2d 469 (1970) (Brennan, J., concurring).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fox
See, e.g., State v. Werneth, 101 Idaho 241 , 611 P.2d 1026 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1129 , 101 S.Ct. 951 , 67 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); Morris, supra; Hocker, supra. The order denying Fox’s motion to reconsider his sentence is affirmed.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Chapman
(4×)
See also State v. Werneth, 101 Idaho 241 , 611 P.2d 1026 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1129 , 101 S.Ct. 951 , 67 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); State v. Horn, 101 Idaho 192 , 610 P.2d 551 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Greensweig
See also State v. Werneth, 101 Idaho 241 , 611 P.2d 1026 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1129 , 101 S.Ct. 951 , 67 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); State v. Horn, 101 Idaho 192 , 610 P.2d 551 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sandoval-Castano
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-5929.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 26, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.