Roche v. Big Moose Oil Field Truck Serv., 449 U.S. 808 (1980). · Go Syfert
Roche v. Big Moose Oil Field Truck Serv., 449 U.S. 808 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
102 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City Council of Austin v. Save Our Springs Coalition (texapp, 1992-04-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" City Council of Austin v. Save Our Springs Coalition
Tex. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Vara v. City of Houston, 583 S.W.2d 935 (Tex.Civ.App.1979, writ ref’d n.r.e.), appeal dism’d, 449 U.S. 807 , 101 S.Ct. 54 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Wall v. Alleman (2×)
La. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See LSA-C.C.P. art. 1071, Official Revision Comment. [2] Roche v. Big Moose Oilfield Truck Serv., 371 So.2d 1374 (La.App. 3d Cir.1979), rev'd on other grounds, infra. [3] See Roche v. Big Moose Oil Field Truck Serv., 381 So.2d 396 (La.1980), esp. fn. 1, cert. dism. 449 U.S. 808 , 101 S.Ct. 54 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980); Welch v. Crown-Zellerbach Corp., 365 So.2d 586 (La.App. 1st Cir.1978). [4] We especially note Dr. Blaschke's decision to make a witness credibility call in reaching his conclusion that the condition of the roadway did not cause the accident.
discussed Cited "see" Bailey v. Sharp
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Coalition for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Hufstedler, 449 U.S. 808 , 101 S.Ct. 55 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980), dismissing for want of jurisdiction an appeal from 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D.
discussed Cited "see" Bailey v. Sharp
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Coalition for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Hufstedler, 449 U.S. 808 , 101 S.Ct. 55 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980), dismissing for want of jurisdiction an appeal from 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D.N.Y.) (the dismissal does not state reasons, but the only one given in the papers before the Court was Rule 77(d)).
discussed Cited "see" Felton v. Secretary, United States Department Of Education
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Coalition for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Harris, 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 808 , 101 S.Ct. 55 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980) [hereafter cited as "PEARL "].
discussed Cited "see" Felton v. Secretary, United States Department of Education
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Coalition for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Harris, 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 808 , 101 S.Ct. 65 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980) [hereafter cited as “PEARL ”].
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Horbach v. Kaczmarek
N.D. Ill. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Anderson v. Wagner, 79 Ill.2d 295 , 402 N.E.2d 560, 573 , 37 Ill.Dec. 558, 571 (1979) (“If at the time the plaintiff discovers the ‘fraudulent concealment’ a reasonable time remains within the applicable statute of limitations, [the fraudulent concealment statute] does not toll the running of the limitation period.”), appeal dismissed sub nom Woodward v. Burham City Hospital, 449 U.S. 807 , 101 S.Ct. 54 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980); Suslick v. Rothschild Securities Corp., 164 Ill.App.3d 589 , 517 N.E.2d 600, 603 , 115 Ill.Dec. 189, 192 (1st Dist.1987) (“[S]eetion 13-215, as inte…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Eddings ex rel. Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.
11th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Woodward v. Burnham City Hosp., 449 U.S. 807 , 101 S.Ct. 54 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980), dismissing appeal from Anderson v. Wagner, 79 Ill.2d 295 , 37 Ill.Dec. 558 , 402 N.E.2d 560 (1979) (no due process violation from legislative action “establishing the four-year outer limit within which to file a complaint for medical malpractice”) (appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question; see 49 U.S.L.W. 3065 for summary of questions presented on appeal); Ellerbe v. Otis Elevator Co., 459 U.S. 802 , 103 S.Ct. 24 , 74 L.Ed.2d 39 (1982), dismissing appeal from 618 S.W.2d 870 (Te…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Philip H. Eddings, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Philip Eddings, Deceased, on Behalf of Philip H. Eddings, and Virginia Rae Randt, Individually v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., A/K/A Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, a Foreign Corporation, Patricia Ann Griffin, by and Through Her Next Friend and Natural Father, Larry D. Griffin, and Larry D. Griffin, Individually v. Ford Motor Company, Albert v. Verhine, Jr., a Minor, by A. Brennis Verhine, His Legal Guardian and A. Brennis Verhine, and Glenda L. Verhine, His Natural Parents, Individually v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., a Foreign Corporation and Volkswagen of America, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Dana C. Lamb, a Minor, by and Through His Mother and Next Friend, Jeanne F. Donaldson, Jeanne F. Donaldson, Individually v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, a German Corporation, Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation
11th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Woodward v. Burnham City Hosp., 449 U.S. 807 , 101 S.Ct. 54 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980), dismissing appeal from Anderson v. Wagner, 79 Ill.2d 295 , 37 Ill.Dec. 558 , 402 N.E.2d 560 (1979) (no due process violation from legislative action "establishing the four-year outer limit within which to file a complaint for medical malpractice") (appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question; see 49 U.S.L.W. 3065 for summary of questions presented on appeal); Ellerbe v. Otis Elevator Co., 459 U.S. 802 , 103 S.Ct. 24 , 74 L.Ed.2d 39 (1982), dismissing appeal from 618 S.W.2d 870 (Tex.Ci…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roche
v.
Big Moose Oil Field Truck Service
No. 79-6630.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
449 U.S. 808
Jurisdiction, Set, Would.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Justice Blackmun would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.