green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Boyd
See United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372, 379-81 (5th Cir.) (interest must be personal in nature and not merely part of collective interest), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S. Ct. 83 , 66 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Tobin, Clifford Roger Ackerson, United States of America v. Ronald Tobin
See United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372, 377 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 83 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Northwest National Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas v. United States of America Department of the Treasury Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
See Independent Bankers Ass’n v. Heimann, 613 F.2d 1164 , 1169 & n. 15 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 84 , 66 L.Ed.2d 26 (1980); Lincoln Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd., 856 F.2d 1558, 1563 (D.C.Cir.1988). 7 Secondly, we hold that, despite the Comptroller’s labeling of Section 7.3025 as an interpretive rule, see 44 Fed.Reg. 46428 (Aug. 8, 1979), its nature and history show that it should be construed as a legislative rule, violation of which may form the basis for a cease and desist order.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David W. Judd, Robert N. Puett, Sage Poodry, and Jerry Dean Hall
See United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372, 379 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 83 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980); United States v. Bush, 582 F.2d 1016, 1018-19 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Judd, 687 F.Supp. at 1055-56 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerena
See United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372, 379 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 83 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980) (each defendant must demonstrate an individual, personal expectation of privacy in the location and may not rely on the expectation of the group).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Liefer, George Sharos, and Charles Patterson
See United States v. Lea, 618 F.2d 426, 431-32 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 82 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berniece Larimore, Sam M. Taylor, William G. Butcher, and Orville Bottrell v. C.T. Conover, Comptroller of the Currency
(2×)
See Independent Bankers Ass’n v. Heimann, 613 F.2d 1164, 1168 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. den. 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 84 , 66 L.Ed.2d 26 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul R. Bonansinga
See United States v. Lea, 618 F.2d 426, 429 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 82 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980); United States v. Bush, 522 F.2d 641, 646-49 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 977 , 96 S.Ct. 1484 , 47 L.Ed.2d 748 (1976); United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124, 1149-1150 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 3184 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmie Harold Primrose
See United States v. Lea, 618 F.2d 426, 431-32 (7th Cir.) (testimony that defendant solicited kickbacks from broker not in indictment), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 82 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980); United States v. Reece, 614 F.2d 1259, 1262 (10th Cir.1980) (evidence of defendants’ kickback scheme with meat broker admissible in mail fraud trial for two similar schemes); United States v. Walton, 552 F.2d 1354, 1365 (10th Cir.) (evidence of sixth check in prosecution for interstate transportation of five stolen checks), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 959 , 97 S.Ct. 2685 , 53 L.Ed.2d 277 (1977); bu…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Wormick, Jr.
See United States v. Lea, 618 F.2d 426, 431 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 82 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edwin T. Teal and Hilde Teal v. Eagle Fleet, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, Third Party
See, e.g., Wink v. Rowan Drilling Co., 611 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.) (“releases or settlements involving seaman’s rights are subject to careful scrutiny”), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 84 , 66 L.Ed.2d 26 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Land Title Ass'n v. Clarke
See e.g., Independent Bankers Assoc, v. Heimann, 613 F.2d 1164 (D.C.Cir.1979) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 84 , 66 L.Ed.2d 26 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chapa v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372, 377 (5th Cir.1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 83 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1981); United States v. Byers, 600 F.2d 1130, 1132 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rollins Environmental Services (FS), Inc. v. Parish of St. James
All evidence to support the Rollins claim is now before this Court.”); Appellant’s Brief at 21 ("Remand of the case for findings as to the applicability of the ordinance and its validity is unnecessary, and would be wasteful of judicial resources since no issues of material fact remain and the legal issues can be fully briefed and argued in this appeal.”); Appellant's Reply Brief at 3 ("The question of whether Ordinance 85-1 is constitutional, as well as the question of whether subject matter jurisdiction resides in the district court, should both be decided in this appeal.”); see also…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rollins Environmental Services (Fs), Inc. v. The Parish Of St. James
All evidence to support the Rollins claim is now before this Court."); Appellant's Brief at 21 ("Remand of the case for findings as to the applicability of the ordinance and its validity is unnecessary, and would be wasteful of judicial resources since no issues of material fact remain and the legal issues can be fully briefed and argued in this appeal."); Appellant's Reply Brief at 3 ("The question of whether Ordinance 85-1 is constitutional, as well as the question of whether subject matter jurisdiction resides in the district court, should both be decided in this appeal."); see also Indepen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronnie Gene Bass v. Phoenix Seadrill/78, Ltd., Third-Party v. Crown Rig Building Services, Inc., and Branham Industries, Inc., Third-Party
See, e.g., Wink v. Rowan Drilling Co., 611 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.) (“releases or settlements involving seaman’s rights are subject to careful scrutiny”), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 84 , 66 L.Ed.2d 26 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Allen Parks and Harry Bruce Holloway
See also United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372, 379-80 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 83 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Dale Dunn and Robert Lyle Carpenter
See, e.g., United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 83 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elton Orville Meyer and Walter McMahon
See also United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372, 377 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 83 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1981); United States v. Byers, 600 F.2d 1130, 1132 (5th Cir. 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lea
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-1672.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.