green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Lee Rhodes, and Charles Dudley
See United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940, 945 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981) (jury verdict which differentiated between counts indicated that the court's instruction to view each defendant separately was sufficient to cure any prejudice from a joint trial); United States v. Kaplan, 554 F.2d 958, 967 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 956 , 98 S.Ct. 483 , 54 L.Ed.2d 315 (1977) (failure to convict all defendants indicated that the jury was able to “separate the evidence as it pertains to each jointly tried defendant.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Eugene Miller
See United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940 , 944 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1980); United States v. Sangrey, 586 F.2d 1312, 1314 (9th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. Bliesner
See Ogden, 303 F.2d at 736-37 ; see also United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940, 948 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1980) and 449 U.S. 1093 , 101 S.Ct. 890 , 66 L.Ed.2d 822 (1981) (once witness testified that interviewing government attorney took notes, it was error to fail to conduct inquiry as to whether he had adopted or approved those notes).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dictado
See, e.g., United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 (1980); United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 (1979); see generally Annot., 44 A.L.R.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Roy Clark v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana
See, e.g., English v. United States, 620 F.2d 150, 153 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d, 75 (1980); United States v. Dady, 536 F.2d 675 (6th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ammar
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Dowling, 633 F.2d at 665; United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d at 460 ; see also United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940, 947 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1980); United States v. Green, 523 F.2d 229 , 233 n. 4 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1074 , 96 S.Ct. 858 , 47 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). 28 Appellants claim that the court used the wrong standard of proof in making the required threshold determination.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ammar
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Dowling, 633 F.2d at 665; United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d at 460 ; see also United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940, 947 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1980); United States v. Green, 523 F.2d 229 , 233 n. 4 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1074 , 96 S.Ct. 858 , 47 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ingram
v.
United States and Porter v. United States
v.
United States and Porter v. United States
No. 79-6732; No. 80-5077.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 622 F. 2d 588.