green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"error in interpreting a statutory grant of jurisdiction ... does not render the judgment a complete nullity"
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Depex Reina 9 Partnership v. Texas International Petroleum Corporation
error in interpreting a statutory grant of jurisdiction ... does not render the judgment a complete nullity
discussed
Cited "see"
FTC v. Mt Olympus Financial
See Security and Exchange Commission v. Blackfoot Bituminous, Inc., 622 F.2d 512 , 514 (l0th Cir.), cert denied, 449 U.S. 955 (l980); Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of New Mexico, 504 F.2d 1296, 1303 (l0th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Nodes
See Kansas City S. Ry. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp., 624 F.2d 822, 825-26 (8th Cir.1980) (finding lack of subject matter jurisdiction makes order unenforceable only when there is a “total want of jurisdiction” and the court plainly usurps power) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 (1980); Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 12 cmt. d (1980) (modern view favors the finality of judgments).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Woodbury Baker, United States of America v. Timothy Blackwell
(2×)
See Levy, 703 F.2d at 794 n. 9 (raising possibility of utilizing procedure but finding it inappropriate in that case based on government’s misconduct) (citing United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 105 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980)).
examined
Cited "see"
Sabo v. Casey
(4×)
See Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565, 567, 569 (3d Cir.), cert. den. 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980). (designation of paragraphs as (a)(b)(c)(d) not contained in original text).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Gibbs, United States of America v. Bruce Johnson, A/K/A Willie Ruff, United States of America v. Randy Ray Whitehead, United States of America v. Harold A. Bennett
See United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 104 (10th Cir.) ("the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's inference that these appellants possessed cocaine with an intent to distribute, but the jury was free also not to draw such an inference. [The appellants] were entitled to a jury consideration of the offense of simple possession"), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980). 32 The rationale for giving the lesser-included offense instruction is both logical and appealing: 33 [w]here one of the elements of the offense charged remains in doubt, but the defendant is…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gibbs
See United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 104 (10th Cir.) (“the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s inference that these appellants possessed cocaine with an intent to distribute, but the jury was free also not to draw such an inference. [The appellants] were entitled to a jury consideration of the offense of simple possession”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Enrique Espinosa
See United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 104 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Falcon Construction Company, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Economy Forms Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee
See Midland Telecasting Company v. Midessa Television Co., Inc., 617 F.2d 1141 , 1144 n. 5 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Christopher Beale
See last part of note 20, infra, and Solis, 536 F.2d at 883 ("There was no embarrassment to or search of the person.") 20 To the extent that United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 101 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980); United States v. Sullivan, 625 F.2d 9, 12-13 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1374 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); and United States v. Goldstein, 635 F.2d 356, 360-62 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 962 , 101 S.Ct. 3111 , 69 L.Ed.2d 972 (1981), depart from this unstated rationale, we decline to follow them.
cited
Cited "see"
Raymer v. United States
See Collins v. United States, 621 F.2d 832, 833 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Walsh
(2×)
As noted above, distinctions based on age are permissible if they “rationally further[] the purpose identified by the State . . . . ” Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. at 307, 314 , 96 S.Ct. at 2562, 2567 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 ; see Malmed v. Thorburgh, 621 F.2d 565 , 569-73 & 577 n.18 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980); Johnson v. Lefkowitz, 566 F.2d 866, 868-69 (2d Cir. 1977) (Kaufman, C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greer v. Owners Insurance
See, e.g., Shaw v. Hospital Authority of Cobb County, 614 F.2d 946 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 362 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 (1980) (denying as moot defendant’s motion to strike an affidavit filed by plaintiff where summary judgment was granted for defendant in same Order).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See e.g., Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565 (3rd Cir.), cert denied, 449 U.S. 955 (1980); Trafelet v. Thompson, 594 F.2d 623 (7th Cir.) cert denied, 444 U.S. 906 (1979); Rubino v. Ghezzi, 512 F.2d 431 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 423 U.S. 891 (1975).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Power v. City of Providence
(4×)
See In re Advisory Opinion to the House of Representatives, 485 A.2d 550, 552 (R.I.1984) (if what the Legislature has done is constitutional, the reasons why it has done so are irrelevant); see also Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565, 569 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980) (if court can find that a provision rationally furthers any legitimate objective, it is constitutionally irrelevant whether this reason in fact underlies the decision to pass the provision) (citing Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 612 , 80 S.Ct. 1367, 1373 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1435, 1445 (1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Stout
(2×)
See also Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stout v. Commonwealth ex rel. Preate
(2×)
See also Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benny Carl Lovell
As we noted in Goldstein , “[i]t is undisputed that, had one of the DEA agents through the use of his olfactory sense detected the odor of the controlled substances in the suitcases, a search would not have occurred.” Id. at 361 (quoting United States v. Sullivan, 625 F.2d 9, 13 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1374 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981)); see also United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 101 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980); United States v. Solis, 536 F.2d 880, 881 (9th Cir.1976) (“Generally evidence acquired by unaided…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Asbestos Litigation. Appeal of Raymark Industries, Inc. In No. 86-5236. In Re Asbestos Litigation. Danfield v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Etc., Appeal of Owens-Illinois, Inc., Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, the Celotex Corporation, Armstrong Cork Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, and Fibreboard Corporation, in No. 86-5237. In Re Asbestos Litigation. John W. Gregory and Zelda F. Gregory, His Wife, Zelda F. Gregory, Administratrix and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of John W. Gregory, Deceased Zelda F. Gregory, Individually and Brian Gregory, a Minor by His Natural Parent and Guardian Zelda F. Gregory v. General Motors Corporation, Joseph Doe, Tom Doe, Harry Doe, Robert Doe, Ken Doe, Daniel Doe, Larry Doe, Edward Doe, Sam Doe, Jack Doe, Fred Doe, Vince Doe. Appeal of General Motors Corporation, in No. 86-5370
(2×)
See also Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565, 571 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Danfield v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
(2×)
See also Maimed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565 , 571 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Saetre v. State
(4×)
See, e.g., Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565 (3rd Cir.1980) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 ; Trafelet v. Thompson, 594 F.2d 623 (7th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 906 , 100 S.Ct. 219 , 62 L.Ed.2d 142 ; Rubino v. Ghezzi, 512 F.2d 431 (2nd Cir. 1975) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 891 , 96 S.Ct. 187 , 46 L.Ed.2d 122 ; Boughton v. Price, 70 Idaho 243 , 215 P.2d 286 (1950); O'Neil v. Baine, 568 S.W.2d 761 (Mo.1978); Nelson v. Miller, 25 Utah 2d 277 , 480 P.2d 467 (1971); and Aronstam v. Cashman, 132 Vt. 538 , 325 A.2d 361 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gateway Apts. v. MAYOR & TP. COUN. OF NUTLEY TP.
(2×)
See also Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565, 570-72 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980). [1] This is a burden which plaintiff has failed to bear.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gateway Apartments, Inc. v. Mayor & Township Council
(2×)
See also Malmed v. Thornburgh, 621 F.2d 565, 570-72 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980). 1 This is a burden which plaintiff has failed to bear.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hawkeye Security Insurance v. Porter
See, e.g., Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon, 624 F.2d 822 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. den., 449 U.S. 955 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Malmed
v.
Thornburgh, Governor of Pennsylvania
v.
Thornburgh, Governor of Pennsylvania
No. 80-361.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1980.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.