green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
9.1 score
“it devolves upon one seeking suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshhold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area searched”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Arch Mineral Corporation v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
But see Selco Supply Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 632 F.2d 863, 865 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Nocon v. INS, 789 F.2d 1028, 1032-33 (3d Cir.1986); Nappi v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 282, 283-84 (1972); Consolidated Flower Shipments, Inc.— Bay Area v. C.A.B., 205 F.2d 449, 451 (9th Cir.1953), overruled by, Franklin, 290 F.2d at 719 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nechero v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
erisa "plans" are broader in concept than pure insurance transactions
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gehena
it devolves upon one seeking suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshhold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gerena
it devolves upon one seeking suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshhold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area searched
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gerena
it devolves upon one seeking a suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Milton Teplin
... the underlying state law merely serves a definitional purpose in characterizing the proscribed conduct.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Rollack
"The proponent of a motion to suppress has the burden of establish- ing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the chal- lenged search or seizure." Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 131 n.1 (1978); accord United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rollack
“The proponent of a motion to suppress has the burden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure.” Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 131 n. 1, 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); accord United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See United States v. Loucas, 629 F. 2d 989, 991 (4th Cir.1980), cert. *490 denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 224 (1981) (state substantive offense is not a prerequisite to a Travel Act conviction); United States v. Pomponio, 511 F. 2d 953, 957 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed. 2d 105 (1975) ("The `unlawful activity' specified in the [Travel] Act may be [an offense] under state or federal law and reference to such law is necessary only to identify the type of `unlawful' activity in which the defendants intended to engage.
discussed
Cited "see"
Russo v. Abington Memorial Hospital
See Taggart Corp. v. Life and Health Benefits Administration, Inc., 617 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981). 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (3) defines the terms ‘“employee benefit plan’ or ‘plan’” as follows: “an employee welfare benefit plan or an employee pension benefit plan or a plan which is both an employee welfare benefit plan and an employee pension benefit plan.” Section 1002(1)(A) defines the term “employee welfare benefit plan” to mean, in relevant part, any plan, fund, or program ... established or maintained by an …
cited
Cited "see"
Weaver v. Clarke
See Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 122 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981). 10 Qualified immunity requires a two-step analysis.
cited
Cited "see"
Weaver v. Clarke
See Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 122 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Buck Williams, United States of America v. Charles J. McNeal
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Lee Rusher, United States of America v. Sarah Jean Shoemaker Rusher, A/K/A Sarah Anne Rusher, United States of America v. James Joseph Flannery, A/K/A James Joseph Fleming, A/K/A Richard J. Mutschler
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rusher
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sally Gahn v. Allstate Life Insurance Company
See Taggart Corp. v. Life and Health Benefits Admin., Inc., 617 F.2d 1208, 1210 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Donovan v. Dillingham, 688 F.2d 1367, 1372 (11th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance Company
See Taggart Corp. v. Life & Health Benefits Admin., 617 F.2d 1208, 1211 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Aeromar, C. Por A. v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration
See Selco Supply Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 632 F.2d 863, 865 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matthew 25 Ministries, Inc. v. James P. Corcoran, Superintendent of New York State Department of Insurance
See Taggert Corp. v. Efros, 475 F.Supp. 124, 126-27 (S.D.Texas 1979), aff'd, 617 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 (1981); National Business Conference Employee Benefit Association v. Anderson, 451 F.Supp. 458, 462 (S.D.Iowa 1977); Bell v. Employee Security Benefit Association, 437 F.Supp. 382, 393 (D.Kansas 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charlotte James v. United States of America, Kathy Butler, Individually and as Surviving Wife and Heir of Eddy Butler v. United States of America, Susan B. Clardy, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Bridget Marie Clardy and Kenneth Clardy v. United States
Co., 210 F.2d at 270 ; see Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 227 (8th Cir.1977); Stover v. United States, 332 F.2d 204 , 205 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 922 , 85 S.Ct. 276 , 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964) 18 National Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. United States
Co., 210 F.2d at 270 ; see Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 227 (8th Cir.1977); Stover v. United States, 332 F.2d 204 , 205 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 922 , 85 S.Ct. 276 , 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964). .
cited
Cited "see"
Kromnick v. School District
See Caulfield v. Board of Education, 632 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kromnick v. School District Of Philadelphia
See Caulfield v. Board of Education, 632 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981). 82 Nonetheless, in considering any affirmative action plan designed to be remedial, the courts must not overlook the caution expressed in Justice Brennan's opinion for the Court in Weber that the plan be "a temporary measure", 443 U.S. at 208 , 99 S.Ct. at 2729 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Associated Radio Service Co. v. Page Airways, Inc., 624 F.2d 1342 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 226 (1981); Northwest Power Products, Inc. v. Omark Industries, 576 F.2d 83 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 1116 , 99 S.Ct. 1021 , 59 L.Ed.2d 75 (1979); Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Associated Radio Service Co. v. Page Airways, Inc., 624 F.2d 1342 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 226 (1981); Northwest Power Products, Inc. v. Omark Industries, 576 F.2d 83 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1116 , 99 S.Ct. 1021 , 59 L.Ed.2d 75 (1979); Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Invictus Records, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
See Associated Radio Service Co. v. Page Airways, Inc., 624 F.2d 1342, 1348 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 226 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray E. Oliver, A/K/A Edward Ray Oliver
(2×)
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); United States v. Van Dyke, 643 F.2d 992, 994 (4th Cir. 1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cobler
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gautier-Figueroa v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Puerto Rico, Inc.
See e.g., Arivella v. Alcatel-Lucent, 755 F.Supp.2d 353, 364 (D.Mass.2010) (“Continuation of the certain insurance benefits for one year and the ability to roll the cash payments into an IRA do not strike the Court ... as the sort of ongoing administrative programs that would shift the [plan] into the ambit of ERISA.”); Kaelin v. Tenneco, Inc., 28 F.Supp.2d 489, 491 (N.D.Ill.1998) (determining that an employee assistance program is not an ERISA plan); see also Taggart Corp. v. Life and Health Benefits Admin., Inc., 617 F.2d 1208, 1211 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Tariq A-R-Y
(2×)
Liichow v. State, 288 Md. 502, 511 , 419 A.2d 1041, 1046 (1980); see also Doering v. State, 313 Md. 384, 397 , 545 A.2d 1281, 1287 (1988) (“In assessing the gravity of an intrusion, we consider the objective expectation of privacy that reasonably existed, and the extent to which it was invaded.”); see also United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1154 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981) (Ownership alone is insufficient to establish a reasonable and legitimate expectation of privacy for purposes of determining the validity of a warrantless …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dodd v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
The parties have not briefed the question of whether the CCAIA may establish or maintain an ERISA plan, see Credit Manager’s Ass’n, 809 F.2d at 625 ; see also Taggart Corp. v. Life & Health Benefits Admin., 617 F.2d 1208, 1210 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Committee, Intervenor
See also Selco Supply Co. v. EPA, 632 F.2d 863, 865 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981) (holding that statutory language similar to that of the Hobbs Act created a window).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power Company, Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power Company
See, e.g., Associated Radio Service Co. v. Page Airways, Inc., 624 F.2d 1342, 1358 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 226 (1981) (vexatious litigation brought as a part of a scheme of unfair trade practices falls within the sham exception); Affiliated Capital Corp. v. City of Houston, 735 F.2d 1555, 1566 (5th Cir.1984) (en banc) (sham exception applied where proof showed that public official and governmental entity conspired with private participants in violation of the Sherman Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charlotte James v. United States of America, Kathy Butler, Individually and as Surviving Wife and Heir of Eddy Butler v. United States of America, Susan B. Clardy, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Bridget Marie Clardy and Kenneth Clardy v. United States
See, e.g., Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 227 (8th Cir.1977); Stover v. United States, 332 F.2d 204 , 205 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 922 , 85 S.Ct. 276 , 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964); National Manufacturing Co., 210 F.2d at 270.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James v. United States
See, e.g., Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 227 (8th Cir.1977); Stover v. United States, 332 F.2d 204 , 205 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 922 , 85 S.Ct. 276 , 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964); National Manufacturing Co., 210 F.2d at 270.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Loucas
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-1017.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1981.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.