green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.1 score
“it is the commitment of the faculty to religious values no matter what subject in the curriculum is taught and the obligation to propagate those values which provides the risk of entanglement.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dayton Christian Schools, Inc. v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission
it is the commitment of the faculty to religious values no matter what subject in the curriculum is taught and the obligation to propagate those values which provides the risk of entanglement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Salem College & Academy, Inc. v. Employment Division
it is the suffusion of religion into the curriculum which create the conflict with the religion clauses and not the vesting of legal title or the responsibility of operation.
cited
Cited "see"
Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility South
See McCall v. Andrus, 628 F.2d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1700 , 68 L.Ed.2d 197 (1981). 4 Second, the state failed to raise the issue until its reply brief.
cited
Cited "see"
Kelly Kare, Ltd. v. O'rourke
See Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. v. Costle, 632 F.2d 1014, 1017 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1698 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Kelly Kare, Ltd. v. O'Rourke
See Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. v. Costle, 632 F.2d 1014, 1017 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1698 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Alvarez, Gustavo Holguin, Leovigilda Rivera, Humberto Olivares Castrellon and Oneyda Zambrana
(2×)
See Brown v. Harris, 666 F.2d 782, 786 (2d Cir.1981) (“Witnesses who listen to a crime that has been ‘memorialized on tape,’ United States v. Aiken, 491 F.Supp. 37, 38 (S.D.N.Y.) aff'd mem., 639 F.2d 769 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981), are in a position to offer uniquely reliable testimony. ... [T]hey have the luxury of listening to the tape in an office, where they can devote their full attention to it...cert. denied, 456 U.S. 948 , 102 S.Ct. 2017 , 72 L.Ed.2d 472 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Curtis J. Bernhardt, Michael F. McCarthy Harold T. Okahara, Jr., and Carl J. Bernhardt
Id.; accord McCall v. Andrus, 628 F.2d 1185, 1187, 1189 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1700 , 68 L.Ed.2d 197 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vitek Electronics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of Electrical, Radio, and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Vitek Electronics, Inc., Intervenor
See Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305, 312 (3d Cir.1980) (in banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981). 72 Therefore, although I agree with the majority that we should enforce the Board's order insofar as it requires bargaining as to the effects of the closing, I would have gone further and enforced the entire order, leaving it to Vitek to utilize the available administrative compliance procedure to explain and/or excuse its failure to comply. * Honorable Joseph S. Lord III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by desi…
cited
Cited "see"
Vitek Electronics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305, 312 (3d Cir.1980) (in banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 1814, International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Jackson Engineering Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
NLRB v. WTVJ, Inc., 268 F.2d 346, 348 (5th Cir.1959) ("Even absent an exception, the Board is not compelled to act as a mere rubber stamp for its [ALJ]."); see Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305, 315-16 (3d Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981); NLRB v. Duncan Foundry & Machine Works, Inc., 435 F.2d 612, 620 (7th Cir.1970); Kohler Co., 128 N.L.R.B. 1062 , 1096 (1960), remanded on other grounds sub. nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 1814, International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
NLRB v. WTVJ, Inc., 268 F.2d 346, 348 (5th Cir. 1959) (“Even absent an exception, the Board is not compelled to act as a mere rubber stamp for its [ALJ].”); see Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305 , 315—16 (3d Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981); NLRB v. Duncan Foundry & Machine Works, Inc., 435 F.2d 612, 620 (7th Cir. 1970); Kohler Co., 128 N.L.R.B. 1062 , 1096 (1960), remanded on other grounds sub. nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Presbyterian/st. Luke's Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, St. Luke's Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals, Intervenor
The test for violations of section 8(a)(1) is not whether an attempt at coercion has succeeded or failed, but “whether the employer engaged in conduct which reasonably tends to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the free exercise of their section 7 rights.” NLRB v. Berger Transfer & Storage Co., 678 F.2d 679 , 689 (7th Cir.1982); see Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305, 314 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Champion Parts Rebuilders, Inc., Northeast Division v. National Labor Relations Board
See Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305, 317 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981); Flambeau Plastics Corp. v. NLRB, 401 F.2d 128 , 134 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1019 , 89 S.Ct. 625 , 21 L.Ed.2d 563 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pepsico, Inc. v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission
To obtain such relief, a party must make “a clear showing of (a) irreparable harm and (b) either (1) likelihood of success on the *831 merits or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party requesting the preliminary relief.” Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of Israel, 670 F.2d 8, 11 (2d Cir.1982); see Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. v. Costle, 632 F.2d 1014, 1018 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1698 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 , reh’g. denied…
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Keystone Pretzel Bakery, Inc.
See Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305 (3d Cir.1980) (in banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Ram v. Blum
See Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. v. Costle, 632 F.2d 1014, 1018 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1698 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Minnesota v. Block
See Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. v. Costle, 632 F.2d 1014, 1018-19 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1698 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc. v. Perales
See, e.g., Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. v. Costle, 632 F.2d 1014, 1018 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1698 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981); Medical Society of the State of New York v. Toia, 560 F.2d 535, 538 (2d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc. v. Perales
See, e.g., Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. v. Costle, 632 F.2d 1014, 1018 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1698 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981); Medical Society of the State of New York v. Toia, 560 F.2d 535, 538 (2d Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Almonte v. Pierce
See, e.g., Union Carbide Agricultural Products v. Costle, 632 F.2d 1014 , 1017 (2nd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1698 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCarthy v. Manson
See also McCall v. Andrus, 628 F.2d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1700 , 68 L.Ed.2d 197 (1981) (waiver of appellate review); Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., supra, 616 F.2d at 605 (waiver of appellate review); Consorcio Constructor Impregilo v. Mack Trucks, Inc., supra, 497 F.Supp. at 594 (waiver of review by the district court); Webb v. Califano, 468 F.Supp. 825, 830-831 (E.D.Cal.1979) (waiver of review by the district court; “[h]aving failed to object within the time provided, the parties cannot mandate a de novo review; they may only suggest it…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Oil Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See, e.g., Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305, 312 (3d Cir. 1980) (in banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1699 , 68 L.Ed.2d 196 (1981); Electrical Products Division of Midland-Ross Corp. v. NLRB, 617 F.2d 977, 987 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 210 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Waters
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-1061.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.