green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dale Matthew Olson v. Leslie Green, Chairman of Minnesota Board of Corrections, and Warren Spannaus, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
See United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1381-85 (8th Cir. 1981); United States v. Palumbo, 639 F.2d 123, 127-28 (3d Cir. 1981); United States v. Sarmiento-Perez, 633 F.2d 1092, 1102-03 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Oliver, 626 F.2d 254, 261-63 (2d Cir. 1980); United States v. Love, 592 F.2d 1022, 1024-26 (8th Cir. 1979); United States v. Lilley, 581 F.2d 182, 187-88 (8th Cir. 1978); but see United States v. Robinson, 635 F.2d 363, 364 (5th Cir.) (statements of accomplice while not in custody admissible against defendants under Rule 804(b)(3) and confrontation clause), cert. denied, 452 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Nobby Lobby, Inc. v. City of Dallas
See Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943, 944 (5th Cir.) (upholding permanent injunction against prosecution of plaintiffs for having exercised First Amendment rights and holding that “the threat of multiple or repeated prosecutions is not necessary to establish bad faith prosecution”), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Shaw v. Garrison, 467 F.2d 113, 122 (5th Cir.) (Wisdom, J.) (holding that a finding of bad faith prosecution is subject to “clearly erroneous” standard on review and that such a finding “establishes irreparable injury both great and imme…
discussed
Cited "see"
Privitera v. California Board Of Medical Quality Assurance
See supra, 894 7 While the Ninth Circuit has not addressed this issue, the Fifth Circuit has held that "[a] showing of bad faith or harassment is equivalent to a showing of irreparable injury under Younger, and irreparable injury independent of the bad faith prosecution need not be established." Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943, 944 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crimpers Promotions, Inc. v. Home Box Office, Inc.
Defendants’ Memorandum, at 14-15 and n. *; see Reading Industries, Inc. v. Kennecott Copper Corp., 477 F.Supp. 1150, 1160 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff’d, 681 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation
See Reading Industries v. Kennecott Copper Corp., 631 F.2d 10, 14 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, 600 F.2d 1148, 1157-60 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 280 , 66 L.Ed.2d 137 (1980); Mid-West Paper Products Co. v. Continental Group, Inc., 596 F.2d 573, 578, 582-83 (3d Cir.1979); Callahan v. Scott Paper Co., 541 F.Supp. 550 (E.D.Pa.1982). 5 First, we turn to Gulf’s claim that Illinois Brick precludes recovery for overcharges paid to cartel members not named as defendants.
discussed
Cited "see"
Madalyn Murray O'Hair and Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Mark White
(2×)
Id. at 44, 53-54 , 91 S.Ct. at 750, 754-755; accord, Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943 , 944 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Henry v. First National Bank of Clarksdale, 595 F.2d 291, 300 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1074 , 100 S.Ct. 1020 , 62 L.Ed.2d 756 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roger Arkebauer v. Michael Kiley, Individually and as State's Attorney of Shelby County, Illinois
See also Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943 (5th Cir.) (holding that bad faith is established when the prosecution was motivated by retaliation or deterrence), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981). 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackwelder v. Safnauer
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943, 944 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Meese
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943 (5th Cir. Jan. 1981) (enjoining prosecutions brought to harass individuals for exercising their First Amendment rights), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Wilson v. Thompson, 593 F.2d 1375 (5th Cir.1979) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Meese
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943 (5th Cir. Jan. 1981) (enjoining prosecutions brought to harass individuals for exercising their First Amendment rights), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Wilson v. Thompson, 593 F.2d 1375 (5th Cir.1979) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grosser v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.
See, e.g., Reading Industries Inc. v. Kennecott Copper Corp., 631 F.2d 10, 13 (2d Cir.1980) (involving two separate product markets— refined copper and scrap — and requiring analysis of various types of market participants and interactions), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); de Atucha, 608 F.Supp. at 517 (requiring the tracing of price effects on both domestic and foreign silver markets).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Wackenhut Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e. g., NLRB v. Manhattan Corporation, 620 F.2d 53 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3050 , 69 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981) (ballot with the word “no” written on the back should not be voided but should have been counted as a vote against representation by the union); NLRB v. Titche-Goettinger Co., 433 F.2d 1045 (5th Cir. 1970) (where ballots had contained no marking on their faces but only the word “no” on their backs, the ballots were not void but were counted as votes against representation).
Reading Industries, Inc.
v.
Kennecott Copper Corp.
v.
Kennecott Copper Corp.
No. 80-1717.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1981.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.