green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.3 score
“e have held that withdrawal requires proof of affirmative action to disavow or defeat the purposes of the conspiracy”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Efrain L. Melendez
e have held that withdrawal requires proof of affirmative action to disavow or defeat the purposes of the conspiracy
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. William Howard Newman
(4×)
See United States v. Battista, 646 F.2d 237, 246 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1046 , 102 S.Ct. 586 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doris McDaniel v. Essex International, Inc., A/K/A Essex Wire, a Michigan Corporation, and International Association of MacHinists Local Lodge No. 982
See Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers, 643 F.2d 445 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1046 , 102 S.Ct. 587 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981); Tooley v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 648 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1098 , 102 S.Ct. 671 , 70 L.Ed.2d 639 (1981); Anderson v. General Dynamics Convair Aerospace Div., 648 F.2d 1247 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1145 , 102 S.Ct. 1006 , 71 L.Ed.2d 297 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reginald Dents
A. Burden of Proof on Withdrawal 27 The law in this circuit is clear that "[d]efendants have the burden of proving withdrawal because it is an affirmative defense." United States v. Lash, 937 F.2d 1077, 1083 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 397 (1991), and cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 943 (1992); see also United States v. Battista, 646 F.2d 237, 246 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1046 (1981). 28 Dents asks the court to overrule this clear precedent in light of the opposite result reached by the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225 (7th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wages
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Battista, 646 F.2d 237, 245 (6th Cir.1981), cert, den., 454 U.S. 1046 , 102 S.Ct. 586 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981); United States v. Pin-kus, 579 F.2d 1174, 1175 (9th Cir.1978); United States v. Womack, 509 F.2d 368, 378 (D.C.Cir.1972), cert, den., 422 U.S. 1022 , 95 S.Ct. 2644 , 45 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Cincinnati v. Contemporary Arts Center
See, also, United States v. Battista (C.A. 6, 1981), 646 F. 2d 237 , certiorari denied (1981), 454 U.S. 1046 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peraino
v.
United States and Battista v. United States
v.
United States and Battista v. United States
No. 81-14; No. 81-416.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1981.
Brennan, Convictions, Grant, Petitions.
Cited by 30 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would grant the petitions and reverse the convictions.Reported below: 646 F. 2d 237.