green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.4 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases ·
“[P]arole board members are entitled to absolute immunity for parole board decisions.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
caed 2025
arole board members are entitled to absolute immunity for parole board decisions.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Neal
we review a trial court's denial of a severance motion for abuse of discretion and reverse only if denial deprived defendant of a fair trial, resulting in a miscarriage of justice
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Neal
we review a trial court's denial of a severance motion for abuse of discretion and reverse only if denial deprived defendant of a fair trial, resulting in a miscarriage of justice
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Brooks v. Newsom
See Sellars v. Procunier, 26 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); cf. Swift v. California, 384 27 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute immunity for 28 conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., in performing investigatory or 1 law enforcement functions).
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Correa v. Shaffer
See Sellars v. Procunier, 25 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); cf. Swift v. California, 384 26 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute immunity for 27 conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., performing investigatory or law 28 enforcement functions).
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Brooks v. Newsom
See Sellars v. 14 Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); cf. Swift v. 15 California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute 16 immunity for conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., in performing 17 investigatory or law enforcement functions).
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Victory v. Shaffer
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 1 Under the Due Process Clause, the standard analysis “proceeds in two steps: We first ask 2 whether there exists a liberty or property interest of which a person has been deprived, and if so 3 we ask whether the procedures followed by the State were constitutionally sufficient.” Cooke, at 4 219.
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Gay v. Shaffer
See Sellars v. 5 Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); cf. Swift v. 6 California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute 7 immunity for conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., performing 8 investigatory or law enforcement functions).
discussed
Cited "see"
Quartararo v. Catterson
With respect to the first factor — which considers the need for absolute immunity in order to permit the effective performance of the function — it is clear to the Court that in view of the high emotions that are generated, and the related likelihood of litigation that can be expected to ensue from a parole release decision where an inmate’s liberty is at stake, absolute immunity is necessary to serve the public interest “in order that the official not, out of fear of exposure to a civil suit for damages, be intimidated in the exercise of his discretion and the proper performance of hi…
cited
Cited "see"
Patrick James Campbell v. Henry Burgess Thomas Craig
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald R. Hale v. California Board of Prison Terms and Paroles
See Anderson v. Boyd, 714 F.2d 906, 908-09 (9th Cir.1983) (citing Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981)). 2 5 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr. v. Dennis Marsh, Executive Secretary, Indeterminate Sentence Review Board
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
ca4 1989
See United States v. Tashjian, 660 F.2d 829, 837-38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. West
See United States v. Tashjian, 660 F.2d 829, 837-38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tanya Mann
See United States v. Tashjian, 660 F.2d 829, 842 (1st Cir.) (reversing aiding and abetting convictions for government’s failure to prove principal’s requisite intent), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harlow v. Clatterbuck
(2×)
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); Douglas v. Muncy, 570 F.2d 499 (4th Cir. 1978); Pope v. Chew, 521 F.2d 400 (4th Cir. 1975); Cruz v. Skelton, 502 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1974); Silver v. Dickson, 403 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 990 (1969); Siess v. McConnell, 74 Mich. App. 613 , 255 N.W.2d 2 (1977) (parole board members immune from suit arising out of discretionary act of releasing prisoner); Jarrett v. Wills, 383 P.2d 995 (Ore. 1963) (superintendent of home for mentally deficient immune from liability based on temporary r…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward Ringland
See United States v. Tashjian, 660 F.2d 829, 833 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981); Luna, 585 F.2d at 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Billy Irl Glover v. Bruce Tower, Public Defender of Douglas County, Oregon and Gary Babcock, Public Defender of the State of Oregon
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 ,1299 n. 7 (9th Cir.), cert., denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981); see also Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 , 102 S.Ct. 445 , 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981) (public defender is the functional equivalent of a privately retained attorney).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Padilla
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkins, 659 F.2d 769, 773 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981); Williams v. State, 271 Ind. 656 , 395 N.E.2d. 239, 245 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel Johnson v. Joe Kegans and John Holmes
(2×)
See, e.g., Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981). 38 State actors who simply provide information to the Texas parole board, and who act neither under oath nor subject to cross-examination by a prisoner or his representative, are not subject to sufficient corrective process.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Central Maine Power Co.
The Court disclaimed any similarity between the discipline committee and the traditional parole board, which is “a ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body” serving “essentially ‘as an arm of the sentencing judge.’ ” Id. at 204 , 106 S.Ct. at 502 (citing Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 489 , 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2604 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972)); see also Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 , 1302 n. 15 (9th Cir.) (parole board officials absolutely immune from suit for damages), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Conner v. Alston
See also Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981) (describing similarity of judge’s and parole officer’s functions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paoli v. Lally
See, e.g., Sellars v. Procurer, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (CA9), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 [ 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 ] (1981); Evans v. Dillahunty, 711 F.2d 828, 830-31 (CA8 1983); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cleavinger v. Saxner
(2×)
See, e. g., Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F. 2d 1295, 1303 (CA9), cert. denied, 454 U. S. 1102 (1981); Evans v. Dillahunty, 711 F. 2d 828, 830-831 (CA8 1983); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerry J. James, United States of America v. Thomas K. James
See United States v. Thomas, 449 F.2d at 1187 ; see also United States v. Moore, 653 F.2d 384, 390 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 680 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981) (jurisdiction using more “coercive” Allen charge gives trial court complete discretion to issue the charge once jury has reached an impasse *891 after a reasonable amount of time).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Santangelo v. State
Compare Sellars v Procunier (641 F2d 1295, cert den 454 US 1102 ) and Douglas v Muncy (570 F2d 499) giving absolute immunity to parole officials, with Fowler v Cross (635 F2d 476) and Thompson v Burke (556 F2d 231) according them only qualified immunity; see, also, Anderson v New York State Div. of Parole ( 546 F Supp 816 ) granting absolute immunity (see discussion, p 28).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hans Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and W.J. Terry
See also Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 , 1298-1300 & nn. 6-9 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981).
Sellars
v.
Procunier
v.
Procunier
No. 81-5593.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1981.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2) · E.D. California (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.