green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Saccoccia
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
We know that Harmelin is not an aberration; in Hutto, another case that ________ _____ teaches much the same lesson, the Court upheld, against a proportionality attack, a sentence of 40 years in prison for possessing nine ounces of marijuana with the intent to distribute it. 454 U.S. at 374.
cited
Cited "see"
Hickey v. Commissioner of Correction
See Cain v. Moore, 182 Conn. 470, 473 , 438 A.2d 723 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S. Ct. 157 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph A. De Monte
See United States v. Miller, 650 F.2d 169, 170 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Saccoccia
See United States v. Cox, 633 F.2d 871, 875 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 130 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fausto Enrique Diaz, United States of America v. Adalberto Jose Restrepo-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Lazaro Rico Pinzon
See United States v. Cox, 633 F.2d 871, 875 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.
See United States v. Dicker, 853 F.2d 1103, 1109 (3d Cir.1988) and United States v. Cox, 633 F.2d 871, 875 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 130 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Middlebrook v. State
See U.S. v. Cox, 633 F.2d 871, 875 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 130 (1981) (the witness’s testimony that it was her impression when she and the defendant were done talking that he was involved in the offense was admissible since it was “rationally based on [her] perception ... and helpful either to an understanding of the testimony of the witness on the stand or to the determination of a fact in issue.”); Auerbach v. U.S., 136 F.2d 882, 885 (6th Cir.1943) (a witness’s answer “should hardly be rejected because the witness is not positive ... …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Alfred Whitworth
See United States v. Cox, 633 F.2d 871, 876 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 130 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. H. Daniel Whitman
See United States v. Cox, 633 F.2d 871, 874 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 130 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Knight v. Bourbeau
See Cain v. Moore, 182 Conn. 470, 472 , 438 A.2d 723 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S. Ct. 157 , 70 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Wayne Carson, Cross-Appellee v. Officer Polley, Cross-Appellants
Moreover, it will eliminate any incentive for counsel to use illustrative objects solely as a method of smuggling argument into the jury room.” 22 Wright & Graham, Fed.Prac. & Pro. § 5174 p. 137; see United States v. Cox, 633 F.2d 871, 874 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 130 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
David B. Moffer v. James G. Watt, Secretary, U. S. Department of the Interior
See Yacovone v. Bolger, 645 F.2d 1028,1032 (D.C.Cir.) (removal of postmaster warranted when he committed “serious breach of conduct” that had “significant effect on his reputation for honesty and integrity”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 130 (1981). 11 The MSPB could therefore reasonably conclude that petitioner’s dismissal would “promote the efficiency of the service.” 12 See 5 U.S.C. § 7513 (a) (Supp.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Munnelly v. United States Postal Service
See, e.g., Yacovone v. Bolger, 645 F.2d 1028 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 130 (1981); Gueory v. Hampton, 510 F.2d 1222 (D.C.Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Henry Patterson
See, eg., United States v. Cox, 633 F.2d 871, 874 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 844 , 102 S.Ct. 159 , 70 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981); United States v. Ford, 632 F.2d 1354, 1377 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 934 , 101 S.Ct. 1399 , 67 L.Ed.2d 369 (1981); United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1369 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977).
Humphrey
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-6683.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.