green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wendell Justice
See United States v. Padilla, 960 F.2d 854, 863 (9th Cir.1992) ("Where police misconduct did not induce the witness' cooperation, the testimony will not be suppressed even though the unreasonable intrusion was one step in a series of events that led to the witness testifying." (quoting United States v. Hooten, 662 F.2d 628, 632 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 (1982)). 17 Turning to the factor of temporal proximity, we note that a full seven days had elapsed between the unlawful search of Justice's van and Alexander's statements.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Palmieri
(2×)
See United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 635 (9th Cir.1981) (distinguishing intent to engage in business from intent to enhance a gun collection), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982). 20 Although Palmieri was precluded from arguing that the sales were authorized by his collector's license, the jury charge included the statutory exception for sales from or to enhance a personal collection.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Janine Yvette Rambo and Coretha Denise Shipes
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. T. Andrew Garrett
See United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 637 (9th Cir.1981) (finding no coerciveness or pressure on the jury where trial judge was unaware of how the jury stood, gave the Allen charge only once, and avoided coercive deadlines or threats), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 (1982). 13 We conclude that the Allen charge did not have a coercive effect on the verdict. 14 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alonzo Day
See Collins v. Housewright, 664 F.2d 181 , 183 n. 6 (8th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (quoting Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1093 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979)) (stating one "cannot fault a trial judge for failing to determine a question that he has no reason to believe is in issue”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1639 , 71 L.Ed.2d 872 (1982). 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David A. Crabtree
See United States v. Hooten, 662 F.2d 628 , 631 n. 1 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Griffith
See United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628 (9th Cir.1981) (where police misconduct did not directly secure witnesses' testimony, suppression not called for despite fact that the misconduct was one event in uninterrupted series that led to the witnesses' testifying), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Contreras, William Ray Soto, Reynaldo Garcia, Jr., and Kenneth James Cassie
See United States v. Leon, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) (Supreme Court, not Court of Appeals, has the authority to draw fundamental exceptions for the exclusionary rule). 12 In United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628 , 631 n. 1 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982), we indicated that where federal immunity previously granted is being withdrawn by the same officials who conferred it, we may require specific advice to the suspect that immunity is no longer a consideration.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ted Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 634-35 (CA9 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McGrath
Evidence is not “ ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ simply because it would not have come to light but for the illegal actions of the police.” Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963); see also United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 632 (9th Cir.1981) (stating that evidence may be attenuated even if police misconduct “was one step in a series of events that led to the [discovery of evidence]”), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wesley Griffin v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See, e.g., Collins v. House-wright, 664 F.2d 181, 183 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1639 , 71 L.Ed.2d 872 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark Owen McGuire v. Wayne Estelle, Warden
See, e.g., United States v. Hooten, 662 F.2d 628, 635 (9th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982) (in order for prior act evidence to be admissible under the Fed.R.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Lee Pace
See also United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 636 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982) (trial judge has broad discretion to exclude evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Allan Barry
See, e.g., United States v. Hooten, 662 F.2d 628, 634-35 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982) (Rule 404(b)) and United States v. Russell, 703 F.2d 1243, 1249 (11th Cir.1983) (Rule 405(b)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jimmy Edward Taylor, Peter Martin, Sr., Elizabeth King, and Gerald White
See, e.g., United States v. Hooten, 662 F.2d 628, 631 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982), or that White would have given the statements even in the absence of any inducement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Briggs
(2×)
See also United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 632 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
18 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 428, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,840 Sarah Coursen and Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Terri Johnson, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, Debbie Rohn, and Pamela Van Duyn v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
Fed.R.Evid. 404(b); see also United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 634-35 (9th Cir.1981) (citing United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1325 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982); Ford, 632 F.2d at 1375 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.
Fed.R.Evid. 404(b); see also United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 634-35 (9th Cir.1981) (citing United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1325 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982); Ford, 632 F.2d at 1375 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morris
v.
Faulkner, Sheriff of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
v.
Faulkner, Sheriff of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
No. 81-6058.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1982.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.