green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Search Warrants (Executed on January 23, 1983). Appeal of Matthew Trupiano
But see, e.g., Standard Drywall, Inc. v. United States, 668 F.2d 156 (2d Cir.) (existing criminal prosecution includes pending grand jury investigation), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982); Imperial Distributors, Inc. v. United States, 617 F.2d 892 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 891 , 101 S.Ct. 249 , 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
NBase Communications, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.
one distinct shortcoming of diversity jurisdiction is the interruption of the orderly development and authoritative exposition of state law occasioned by sporadic federal court adjudications.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re: Frank G. Lawson, Debtor. Susanna C. Lawson, Individually and as Guardian of Frank Lawson Kimberly Lawson v. Frank G. Lawson, Debtor-Appellee. In Re: Frank G. Lawson, Debtor. Frank G. Lawson v. Susanna C. Lawson, Individually and as Guardian of Frank Lawson, Jr. Kimberly Lawson
the proper test of whether the payments are alimony lies in proof of whether it was the intention of the parties that the payments be for support rather than as a property settlement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Modern Bookkeeping, Inc. Midstates Financial Services, Inc. Entertainment World, Inc.
we conclude that the denial of appellants' motions is not appealable and, accordingly, we will dismiss the appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Najarian
See, Grand Laboratories, Inc. v. Harris, 660 F.2d 1288, 1289 (8th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1972 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982); United States v. Pro-Ag, Inc., 968 F.2d 681, 684 (8th Cir.1992). 19 The Defendant draws nothing to our attention that counsels a different result, and we find that the regulatory schemes of the FDCA and the PHSA are not mutually exclusive in administratively regulating the management of unlicensed biological products.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aguilar
See Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033, 1039 (9th Cir.1981) (“overbreadth doctrine holds that a law is void on its face if it sweeps within its ambit not solely activity that is subject to governmental control, but also includes within its prohibition the practice of a protected constitutional right”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert P. Aguilar, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert P. Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033, 1039 (9th Cir.1981) ("overbreadth doctrine holds that a law is void on its face if it sweeps within its ambit not solely activity that is subject to governmental control, but also includes within its prohibition the practice of a protected constitutional right"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pro-Ag, Inc. Spencer W. Landswerk
See Grand Labs., Inc. v. Harris, 660 F.2d 1288, 1289, 1292 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, Grand Labs., Inc. v. Schweiker, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1972 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
New England Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Gte Service Corp., National Telephone Cooperative Association, American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Ameritech Operating Co., Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., Satellite Business Systems, U.S. Telephone Association, Telecommunication Research & Action Center, South Central Bell Telephone Co., Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Intervenors. American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, U.S. Telephone Association, Gte Service Corp., Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., Bell Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Intervenors. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Gte Service Corp., Ameritech Operating Co., American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Bell Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Intervenors. Pacific Bell v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Gte Service Corp., Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., Ameritech Operating Co., American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Bell Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Intervenors
See RKO General v. FCC, 670 F.2d 215 , 223 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerena
See Factor’s Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 652 F.2d 278, 283 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982) (a Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit will typically defer to the judgment of a Court of Appeals for another jurisdiction where the later "has essayed its own prediction of the course of state law on a question of first impression within the state ...’’). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,535 in Re Brian Tibbetts Yeates, Debtor. Paulette B. Yeates v. Brian Tibbetts Yeates
See Melichar v. Ost (In re Melichar), 661 F.2d 300, 303 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n
See Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 652 F.2d 278, 289 (2d Cir.1981) (Mansfield, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1937 , 72 L.Ed.2d 422 (1982); Bi-Rite Enterprises, Inc. v. Button Master, 555 F.Supp. 1188, 1201 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Apigram Publishing Co. v. Factors Etc., Inc., No. C 78-525, slip op.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Association
See Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 652 F.2d 278, 289 (2d Cir.1981) (Mansfield, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1937 , 72 L.Ed.2d 422 (1982); Bi-Rite Enterprises, Inc. v. Button Master, 555 F.Supp. 1188, 1201 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Apigram Publishing Co. v. Factors Etc., Inc., No. C 78-525, slip op.
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Larry Joe LONG, Debtor, Larry Joe LONG, Appellant, v. Penelope WEST, F/K/A Penelope West Long, Appellee
See Melichar v. Ost, 661 F.2d 300, 302 (4th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 .
cited
Cited "see"
Abex Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
See id at 1494-95. . 652 F.2d 278 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982). .
cited
Cited "see"
Abex Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Abex Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Abex Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
See id. at 1494-95 27 652 F.2d 278 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982) 28 Id. at 283.
cited
Cited "see"
Howard v. Commissioner
See Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033 , 1037 (9th Cir. 1981) , cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stambor v. 170-SECOND COLLINS
Cleary 3d ed. 1984), and cases collected; see Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982); Sabatino v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, 415 F.2d 632 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1057 , 90 S.Ct. 750 , 24 L.Ed.2d 752 (1970); United States v. Ware, 247 F.2d 698 (7th Cir.1957); Hartzog v. United States, 217 F.2d 706 (4th Cir.1954).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Angels Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Fidelity Television, Inc., Rko General, Inc., Intervenors
See id. at 661 (citing RKO General, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm'n, 670 F.2d 215 , 222-25 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982)). .
cited
Cited "see"
William R. And Lorna E. Hall v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Clark v. City of Los Ange *635 les, 650 F.2d 1033, 1037 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nielsen
(2×)
See also Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033, 1036 (9th Cir.1981) (stating general rule that an appellate court reviews sufficiency of the evidentiary facts to support a trial court's decision to admit evidence and that, "[i]f the grounds given by the district court for admissibility of the evidence are incorrect, the court's ruling will be reversed only if there are no grounds under which the evidence could properly be admitted," but reversing because the court determined that all grounds for admission of hearsay diary were faulty), cert. den. 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White Fabricating Company, Diversified Industries, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Standard Drywall, Inc. v. United States, 668 F.2d 156 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982); Imperial Distrib., Inc. v. United States, 617 F.2d 892 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 891 , 101 S.Ct. 249 , 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980); In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, 604 F.2d 806 (3d Cir.1979) (per curiam). 54 Since I believe this appeal is interlocutory under either of the DiBella tests, there is no need to consider the merits of appellant's claims.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norman G. Kelley, Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company Allstate Life Insurance Company, Cross-Appellees
See, e.g., Lurch v. United States, 719 F.2d 333, 339 (10th Cir.1983) (a pre-trial order that sufficiently defines the issues will generally control at trial and on appeal), cert. denied, 466 *456 U.S. 927, 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Premises Known as 55 West 47th St., Ny v. United States
See also, Standard Drywall, Inc. v. U.S., 668 F.2d 156 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 reh. denied, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2917 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982) 4 Although Sentinel Government Securities is the leading pre-indictment Rule 41(e) case in our District, its decision is based upon the reasoning and analysis set forth by the district court in Standard Drywall.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Astroline Communications Company Limited Partnership v. Federal Communications Commission, Arch Communications Corp., Intervenor
This Court and the Commission have noted on numerous occasions that “applicants before the FCC are held to a high standard of candor and forthrightness.” WHW Enterprises, Inc. v. FCC, 753 F.2d 1132 , 1139 (D.C.Cir.1985); see also RKO General, Inc. v. FCC, 670 F.2d 215 , 229 (D.C.Cir.1981) (Commission may deny applications on grounds of misrepresentation or lack of candor where applicant’s conduct “ ‘threaten[s] the integrity of the Commission’s processes.’ ”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982); Houston Family Television Ltd., 58 Rad.Reg.2d (P &…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pirofsky v. United States
See Application of Campola, 543 F.Supp. 115, 118 (N.D.N.Y.1982); see also Standard Drywall, Inc. v. United States, 668 F.2d 156 , 157 n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 , reh’g denied, 457 U.S. 1112, 102 S.Ct. 2917 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982) (questioning if irreparable harm could ever be shown if the movant is offered copies of the documents seized).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. United States
See also Standard Drywall v. United States, 668 F.2d 156, 157 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982) (describing district court’s standard but not passing on it).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.
At best, these affidavits, which are, in any event, not legally sufficient to oppose a fully supported motion for summary judgment, see Berma Research & Development Co. v. Singer Co., 410 F.2d 572, 577-78 (2d Cir.1969); see also Factors, Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 496 F.Supp. 1090, 1103 (S.D.N.Y.1980) ("Triable issues of fact cannot be conjured up merely by substituting an affidavit that attempts to retract or modify prior sworn testimony”), rev'd on other grounds, 652 F.2d 278 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982), establish only that Otis’ …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Hub Manufacturing, Inc.
See Cooper v. American Airlines, Inc., 149 F.2d 355, 359 (2d Cir.1945) (“federal courts must do their best to guess what the highest state court will do”); see also Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 652 F.2d 278, 281-83 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Robert E. Young
(2×)
See, e.g., Standard Drywall, Inc. v. United States, 668 F.2d 156 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 604 F.2d 806 (3d Cir. 1979) (per curiam); Simons v. United States, 592 F.2d 251 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 835 , 100 S.Ct. 69 , 62 L.Ed.2d 45 (1979); Church of Scientology of California v. United States, 591 F.2d 533 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1043 , 100 S.Ct. 729 , 62 L.Ed.2d 729 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. The Residence of Nicholas Furina
(2×)
See, e.g., Standard Drywall, Inc. v. United States, 668 F.2d 156, 158 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re 1616 Reminc Limited Partnership
See, e.g., Melichar v. Ost, 661 F.2d 300 (4 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982); Mountain Trust Bank v. Shifflett, 255 F.2d 718, 720 (4 Cir.1958); Mutual Savings & Loan Association v. McCants, 183 F.2d 423, 426-27 (4 Cir.1950). 8 Reminc's constitutional challenge to Rule 810 manifestly is an unanticipated one raising issues of first impression.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
1616 Reminc Ltd. Partnership v. Atchison & Keller Co.
See, e.g., Melichar v. Ost, 661 F.2d 300 (4 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982); Mountain Trust Bank v. Shifflett, 255 F.2d 718, 720 (4 Cir.1958); Mutual Savings & Loan Association v. McCants, 183 F.2d 423, 426-27 (4 Cir.1950). 8 Reminc’s constitutional challenge to Rule 810 manifestly is an unanticipated one raising issues of first impression.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parisi v. White (In Re White)
See also Melichar v. Ost, 661 F.2d 300, 303 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 (1982); Snyder v. Snyder (In re Snyder), 7 B.R. 147, 150 (W.D.Va.1980); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 523.-15[3] (15th ed. 1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grand Laboratories, Inc.
v.
Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 81-1428.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.