Hydrolevel Corp. v. Am. Soc'y of Mech. Engineers, Inc., 456 U.S. 989 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Hydrolevel Corp. v. Am. Soc'y of Mech. Engineers, Inc., 456 U.S. 989 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · “any prosecutorial misconduct ... was cured by the overwhelming evidence of petitioner’s guilt”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[a] prosecutor should exercise restraint to avoid needless personal references, without sacrificing the vigor or effectiveness of his argument”
269 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 51 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lugo v. Kuhlmann (nysd, 1999-10-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Lugo v. Kuhlmann
S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
any prosecutorial misconduct ... was cured by the overwhelming evidence of petitioner's guilt
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Satchwell (2×) also: Cited "see"
Conn. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
prosecutor should exercise restraint to avoid needless personal references, without sacrificing the vigor or effectiveness of his argument
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bossinger
2d Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173 (2d Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bossinger
2d Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173 (2d Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Swinton
Conn. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
Included among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hilton
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
Among them are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Fullwood, supra [ 194 Conn. 573 ]; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Reynolds
Conn. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
Included among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Guzman
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
Those factors are “the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pereira
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
Among them are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Full-wood, supra [ 194 Conn. 573 ]; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S Ct. 2269, 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Singh
Conn. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
Included among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Whipper
Conn. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
Id., 539-40 . “ ‘In determining whether prosecutorial misconduct was so serious as to amount to a denial of due process, this court, in conformity with courts in other jurisdictions, has focused on several factors.’ [Id., 540], Included among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Holmes
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
In doing so, we have focused on several factors, [i]ncluded among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Beall
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
In doing so, we have focused on several factors, [i]ncluded among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Alexander
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
These factors include the extent to which the defendant invited the conduct; State v. Fullwood, supra, 194 Conn. 585 ; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hicks
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
In doing so, we have focused on several factors, [i]ncluded among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Butler
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Among them are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Fullwood, supra [ 194 Conn. 585 ]; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Aponte
Conn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Among those factors we include the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rolli
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
In doing so, we have focused on several factors, [i]ncluded among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Adams
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
In doing so, we have focused on several factors, including “the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Chasse
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
In doing so, we have focused on several factors, “[i]ncluded among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Alexander
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Included among those factors are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Aponte
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Among them are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Fullwood, [ 194 Conn. 573, 585 , 484 A.2d 435 (1984)]; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Clark
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Among them are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Fullwood, [ 194 Conn. 573, 585 , 484 A.2d 435 (1984)]; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Marshall
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Among them are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument; State v. Fullwood, [ 194 Conn. 573, 585 , 484 A.2d 435 (1984)]; State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12, 23 , 463 A.2d 558 (1983); the severity of the misconduct; see United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981) [cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Friedland, 660 F.2d 919, 926 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989, 102 S.Ct. 2268 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1982); United States v. Roberto, 801 F.Supp. *501 946, 948-49 (D.Conn.1992).
discussed Cited "see" McEachin v. Ross (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982). 4 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Barkolleh Menplay Forlorma
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Russo, 74 F.3d 1383, 1396 (2d Cir.1996) (quoting United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 )(1982); United States v. Melendez, 57 F.3d 238, 241 (2d Cir.1995).
cited Cited "see" Magnotta v. Berry
S.D.N.Y. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Lee v. State of Or.
D. Or. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. City of Akron, 661 F.2d 1198, 1210-11 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2268 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1283 , judgment aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 462 U.S. 416 , 103 S.Ct. 2481 , 76 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jose Manuel Melendez
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1178-79 (2d Cir.1981) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982); see also United States v. Rivera, 22 F.3d 430, 437 (2d Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Appellee
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1182 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Earl Thompson
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Thomas v. Scully
E.D.N.Y · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (citing United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982)).
cited Cited "see" Gatto v. Hoke
E.D.N.Y · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. den., 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
cited Cited "see" State v. Lucci
Conn. App. Ct. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S. Ct. 2269 , 73 L.
discussed Cited "see" Ernesto Gonzalez v. James E. Sullivan (2×)
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982). 25 Although the prosecutor in the case at hand did not do anything so egregious as to comment on the defendant's failure to take the stand or the defendant's invocation of his fundamental rights, he overstepped the bounds of proper summation.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Emmeramo F. Lopez, and Caridad Roque
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See 498 F.2d at 1338-39 . 36 In United States v. Rios, 611 F.2d 1335 (10th Cir.1979), the prosecutor, without any factual basis, alleged that a defense witness had contrived his answers with the defendant, implied that the defendant had threatened prosecution witnesses, and asserted his own personal belief that the defendant was "a genuine certified Mr. Big in the heroin business." See 611 F.2d at 1341-42 . 37 Finally, in United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173 (2d Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 (1982), the prosecutor explicitly vouched for the credibility of a government wi…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Casamento
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981) ("if proof of guilt is strong, then the prejudicial effect of the comments tends to be deemed insubstantial"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982). 238 Finally, we conclude that the government's statements regarding the April 30, 1983 telephone conversation between Mazzurco and Ganci did not substantially prejudice Polizzi.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Casamento
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981) (“if proof of guilt is strong, then the prejudicial effect of the comments tends to be deemed insubstantial”), cer t. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Hugh J. Shannon A/K/A Hughey J. Shannon, A/K/A Hugh J. Shannon, and Cross-Appellee
8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Risken, 788 F.2d 1361, 1369 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 329 , 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); see United States v. Friedland, 660 F.2d 919, 931 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2268 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" William F. McQuade v. United States (2×)
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: accord · confidence high
If a plaintiff's claim falls within one of those exceptions, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction." Wright v. United States, 719 F.2d 1032, 1034 (9th Cir.1983); accord Monaco v. United States, 661 F.2d 129, 131 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982); Morris, 521 F.2d at 874 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. J. Michael Robilotto, Louis D. Spagnola and Anthony v. Civitello, Defendants
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
This statutory proscription extends to “all persons who exercise control, direct or indirect, authorized or unauthorized[,] over the fund,” United States v. Palmeri, 630 F.2d 192, 199 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 967 & 983, 101 S.Ct. 1484 & 1520, 67 L.Ed.2d 616 & 819 (1981); see United States v. Friedland, 660 F.2d 919, 925 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2268 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1982), including business agents of a local union who exercise influence over employee welfare benefit funds.
discussed Cited "see" Short v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Indians Residing on the Maricopa— Ak Chin Reservation v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 167, 203-04 , 667 F.2d 980, 1003 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Schwimmer
E.D.N.Y · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Friedland, 660 F.2d 919, 930 (3d Cir.1981) (fact that § 1503 obstruction violation consists of attempt to induce rendering of false testimony does not transform it into a “false statements” case, and specificity requirements for such indictments therefore do not apply), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2268 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. Matranga
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1179-80 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982); United States v. Rios, 611 F.2d 1335, 1342-43 (10th Cir.1979).
cited Cited "see" Waymire v. United States
D. Kan. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monaco v. United States, 661 F.2d 129, 131 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Government of the Virgin Islands v. Joseph, Emmanuel
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
We necessarily consider both the individual and combined effect of any challenged comments. 10 See Somers, supra; see generally United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1178-86 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed. 1284 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Redding
unknown court · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gallagher, 576 F.2d 1028, 1042-43 (3d Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 444 U.S. 1040 , 100 S.Ct. 713 , 62 L.Ed.2d 675 (1980); Somers, 496 F.2d at 742 ; Kravitz, 281 F.2d 581, 587 ; see also, e.g., Berger, 295 U.S. at 88 , 55 S.Ct. at 633 (1935); see generally United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1178-86 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. DiPasquale
unknown court · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gallagher, 576 F.2d 1028, 1042-43 (3d Cir. 1978), cert, dismissed, 444 U.S. 1040 , 100 S.Ct. 713 , 62 L.Ed.2d 675 (1980); Somers, 496 F.2d at 742 ; Kravitz, 281 F.2d 581, 587 ; see also, e.g., Berger, 295 U.S. at 88 , 55 S.Ct. at 633 (1935); see generally United States v. Módica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1178-86 (2d Cir.1981), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Boatwright v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hydrolevel Corp.
v.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc.
No. 80-1771.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1982.
456 U.S. 989
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1) · S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.