green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Feola, supra, at 1090-91. “[W]hen the supporting facts ‘present a picture of continuing conduct or an ongoing activity, ... the passage of time between the last described act and the presentation of the application becomes less significant.’” United States v. Ortiz, 143 F.3d 728, 732 (2d Cir.1998) (quoting United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 867 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982)), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
State, Unpublished Decision (3-28-2003)
See United States v. Martino , 664 F.2d 860 , 874 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982) (contents of bag in plain view since bag in plain view and defendant told police what was in bag; statements demonstrate a reduced expectation of privacy); United States v. Candella , 469 F.2d 173 , 175 (2d Cir. 1972) (guns in container in defendant's house were in plain view since container was in plain view and defendant told police that guns were in container).
cited
Cited "see"
Mbm Fisheries v. Bollinger MacHine Shop and Shipyard
See United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 872-73 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See U.S. v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 868 (2d Cir.1981) (use of pen registers and acquisition of telephone records would have been unavailing since they wouldn’t identify the participants to a telephone conversation, and would thus be unlikely to uncover defendant's partners in crime), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Braj Nandan Singh
(2×)
In view of the minimal nature of the government agents’ intrusion and the need for continued surveillance, or an effective substitute therefor, if the controlled delivery of the narcotics was to be effective, see Illinois v. Andreas, supra, 463 U.S. at 773 , 103 S.Ct. at 3325 , id. at 781-82 , 103 S.Ct. at 3329-30 (Brennan, J., dissenting), a reasonable argument might have been made that, under the peculiar facts of this case, there was an “ ‘urgent need’ that ‘justified]’ a warrantless entry.” United States v. Martinez-Gonzalez, 686 F.2d 93, 100 (2d Cir. 1982); see United States…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
See United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 867 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Young
See United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860 , 864 n. 3 (2d Cir.1981), cert, denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1343 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 142 , 328, 42 L.Ed.2d 118 , 283 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Young
See United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860 , 864 n. 3 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1343 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 142 , 328, 42 L.Ed.2d 118 , 283 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Van Horn
See United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 868 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Johnson, 645 F.2d 865, 867 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 991 , 101 S.Ct. 1692 , 68 L.Ed.2d 192 (1981); United States v. Atkins, 618 F.2d 366, 371 (5th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Alvarado Farra and Eduardo Enrique Bastidas
See United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 869-70 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Vasquez, 638 F.2d 507, 529-32 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 528 , 70 L.Ed.2d 396 (1981); United States v. Mapp, 476 F.2d 67, 75 (2d Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Bonfiglio
See United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 874 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982) (contents of bag in plain view since bag in plain view and defendant told police what was in bag; statements demonstrate a reduced expectation of privacy); United States v. Candella, 469 F.2d 173, 175 (2d Cir.1972) (guns in contain er in defendant’s house were in plain view since container was in plain view and defendant told police that guns were in container).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eppolito
“Where, as here, the indictment contains a conspiracy charge, ‘uncharged acts may be admissible as direct evidence of the conspiracy itself.’ ” United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641, 682 (2d Cir.1997) (quoting United States v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 812 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 , 115 S.Ct. 456 , 130 L.Ed.2d 364 (1994)), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998). “ ‘[I]n order to prove a single conspiracy,’ ” rather than multiple conspiracies, “ ‘the government must show that each alleged member agreed to participate in what he knew to be …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 876-77 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luke Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 876-77 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gruber
Macklin, 902 F.2d at 1326 ; United States v. Matya, 541 F.2d 741, 745 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); see also United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 868 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gruber
Macklin, 902 F.2d at 1326 ; United States v. Matya, 541 F.2d 741, 745 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); see also United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 868 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Damon White (91-2005), Tina Moss (91-2152), Eric Piekos (91-2168), James Pelzer (91-2169), Samuel Bowe (91-2308), Aaron Brown (91-2403), Joseph Moss (91-2090)
See, e.g., United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 876 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sammy G. Daily and Frederik A. Figge
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 876 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Ashley, 555 F.2d 462, 467-68 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 869 , 98 S.Ct. 210 , 54 L.Ed.2d 147 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Filiberto
See also United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Bruner, 657 F.2d 1278 (D.C.Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Cattouse
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 878 (2d Cir.1981) (Oakes, J., concurring) ("To the individual law enforcement officer, the circumstances for a warrantless search and seizure always appear exigent."), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Crespo
Dorman, 435 F.2d at 391 , quoted in Martinez-Gonzalez, 686 F.2d at 100 ; see also United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 878-80 (2d Cir.1981) (Oakes, J., concurring), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Grabow
See also, United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); Edmondson v. United States, 402 F.2d 809 (10th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Quema Holloway
See, e.g., United States v. Stine, 675 F.2d 69 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Lawson, 670 F.2d 923 (10th Cir. 1982); United States v. Lowe, 654 F.2d 562 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Smith, 618 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 868 , 101 S.Ct. 203 , 66 L.Ed.2d 87 (1980); United States v. Consuelo-Gonzalez, 521 F.2d 259 (9th Cir.1975) (en banc).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manbeck
See also United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 876 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Manbeck, United States of America v. Kenneth Herring, United States of America v. Mark Huiet Sale, United States of America v. Lorenz Josephus Proden, United States of America v. Kermit Theodore Brogden, United States of America v. John Wesley Flannel, United States of America v. Gary Gallopo, United States of America v. John Benjamin Barton, Jr., Jessie Lee Mallory, and Arthur Duncan, United States of America v. John O'hare, Eddie Brantley, Thomas Earnest Folske, Thomas Sams Hightower, Timothy Allen Laxton, Harrell Lewis, Jr., and John Isidore Stevens, United States of America v. Aaron Douglas Staetter, John Michael Iyoob, James Anthony Hastings, and Gregory Michael Scott, United States of America v. David Martin Summerville
See also United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 876 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tehfe
The court also stated that the liberal examination given staleness in a protracted criminal conduct case "is even more defensible in wiretap cases than in ordinary warrant cases, since no tangible objects which can be quickly carried off are sought." Id.; see also United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 866-67 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 178-79 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981), modified on other grounds, 669 F.2d 185 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tehfe
The court also stated that the liberal examination given staleness in a protracted criminal conduct case "is even more defensible in wiretap cases than in ordinary warrant eases, since no tangible objects which can be quickly carried off are sought.” Id.; see also United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 866-67 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 458 U.S. 1110 , 102 S.Ct. 3493 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1982); United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 178-79 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981), modified on other grounds, 669 F.2d 185 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hogan
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 81-6688.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1982.
Published
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.