green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.5 score
“n officer's interest in his elected position, though not 'property' in the conventional sense, is a recognizable interest for purposes of procedural due process analysis.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ca5 1989
n officer's interest in his elected position, though not 'property' in the conventional sense, is a recognizable interest for purposes of procedural due process analysis.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
League of United Latin American Citizens, Council 4434 v. Clements
n officer's interest in his elected position, though not 'property' in the conventional sense, is a recognizable interest for purposes of procedural due process analysis.
cited
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. White v. Bradley
See Tarrant County v. Ashmore, 635 S.W.2d 417, 421 (Tex.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 452 , 74 L.Ed.2d 606 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Speaks v. New York Life Ins. Co.
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 452 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982.) Plaintiffs first attempt to counter New York Life's arguments by again insisting that they are blocked from raising this issue on appeal, since they did not object at the time.
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas J. Barnes v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Sec. 280A(c)(5)(A) & (B); see Cousino v. Commissioner, 679 F.2d 604, 605 (6th Cir.) (order), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 (1982); Zurstadt v. Commissioner, 52 T.C.M.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. McKenzie, 678 F.2d 629 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 450 , 74 L.Ed.2d 604 (1982) (reversing dismissal of indictment because no actual prejudice to defendant by government’s misconduct).
discussed
Cited "see"
Opinion No.
See Tarrant County v. Ashmore, 635 S.W.2d 417 , 422-23 (Tex.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 (1982) (while officeholder's interest in office is not a "property" interest, it is a "recognizable" interest for purposes of due process requirements, such that he should be given notice of and an opportunity to be heard at proceeding to abolish the office).
discussed
Cited "see"
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
See Tammt County v. Ashmm, 635 S.W.2d 417 ,42X3 (Ten.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 (1982) (while officeholder’s interest in office is not a “property” interest, it is a “recognizable” interest for purposes of due process requirements, such that he should be given notice of and an opportunity to be heard at proceeding to abolish the office).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter M. Benjamin, Melvin H. Klipper and David Peritz v. United Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc.
See Howes v. Great Lakes Press Corp., 679 F.2d 1023, 1030 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 452 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982); Mattivi v. South African Marine *43 Corp., 618 F.2d 163, 167-68 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter McAlester v. United Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 817 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 452 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982). *1261 On the first front, United extensively cross-examined McAlester’s statistical expert and established the fact that statistics may be misleading, but it did not present its own expert to show any inaccuracies in MeAlester’s analysis.
discussed
Cited "see"
Byrd v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.
(2×)
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798 (5th Cir.1982) (P ayne II), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Hammon v. Barry
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 823-24 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
cadc 1987
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 823-24 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Motors Corp. v. Gibson Chemical & Oil Corp.
See Shop & Save Food Markets, Inc. v. Pneumo Corp., 683 F.2d 27, 30-31 (2d Cir.) (no illegal tying where buyer can buy from seller’s competitors in allegedly tied market), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 450 , 74 L.Ed.2d 604 (1982); United States v. Mercedes-Benz of N. Am., Inc., 517 F.Supp. 1369, 1383 (N.D.Cal.1981) (illegal tying claim defeated where allegedly tied product may be obtained from seller of tying product or from approved alternative source).
discussed
Cited "see"
Selzer v. Board of Education of New York
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, 673 F.2d 798 , 813-814 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 452, 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982); Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 246 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Avagliano v. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc., 103 F.R.D. 562, 577 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Sobel v. Yeshiva University, 477 F.Supp. 1161, 1170 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sammy Herrera Venegas and Eddie Adrian Vindiola
See United States v. McKenzie, 678 F.2d 629, 632 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 450 , 74 L.Ed.2d 604 (1982) (citing Cederquist, 641 F.2d at 1353 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clara Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust
(2×)
Accord Payne v. Travenol, 673 F.2d 798, 817 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982); Pegues v. Mississippi State Employment Service, 699 F.2d 760 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); Vuyanich v. Republic National Bank of Dallas, 723 F.2d at 1202 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ivy v. Meridian Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc. [ 673 F.2d 798 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 683 F.2d 417 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982)].
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1986
Id.; see United States v. Watson, 678 F.2d 765, 768 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cilley
Id.; see United States v. Watson, 678 F.2d 765, 768 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Avagliano v. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc.
See Payne v. Travenol Labs., Inc., 673 F.2d 798 , 815 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982); Bobo v. ITT, Cont'l Baking Co., 662 F.2d 340, 342 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 1985 , 72 L.Ed.2d 451 (1982). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ernest E. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 808-09 (5th Cir.) (interlocutory review of class definition appropriate when contours of class composition shape contours of injunctive relief), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982); Kershner v. Mazurkiewcz, 670 F.2d 440 , 448-49 (3d Cir.1982) (same); Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282, 287 , 61 S.Ct. 229, 232 , 85 L.Ed. 189 (1940) (denial oí motion to dismiss may, in appropriate cases, be reviewed by appellate court in § 1292(a)(1) appeal of injunctive relief); see generally 16 C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John C. Humphrey, W.C. Garbez, and Robert D. Smith
See Unit *747 ed States v. Watson, 678 F.2d 765, 768 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Hammon v. Barry
Accord, Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 823-24 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
ca5 1985
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 826 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. National Labor Relations Board
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 826 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Avagliano v. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc.
See Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 814-15, 830 (5th Cir.1982), rehearing denied, 683 F.2d 417 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982). (i) Title VII Claims While plaintiffs may assert Title VII cla^s claims on behalf of persons within the class who have not filed charges with the EEOC, 19 they may not represent those who could not have filed charges during the applicable limitation period, and the class must therefore be defined to exclude such persons.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minella v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TX
See City of Amarillo v. Hancock, 150 Tex. 231, 235-38 , 239 S.W.2d 788, 791-92 (1951) (city may entirely abolish property right created by civil service classification); Smith v. City of Port Arthur, 62 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1933, no writ) (vested right in employment can be modified, amended, or even completely abolished by authorities which gave it life); Bennett v. City of Longview, 268 S.W. 786, 787 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1925, no writ) (voters have power to set aside or modify what would have otherwise been an authorized position and entitlement to benefits); see also Tar…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lehman
(2×)
See, Trial Court Opinion at 2; see also, e.g., United States v. Morales, 889 F.2d 1058 (11th Cir.1989), United States v. Jonas, 639 F.2d 200 (5th Cir.1981), United States v. Watson, 678 F.2d 765 (9th Cir.1982), cert denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982), United States v. Harper, 617 F.2d 35 (4th Cir.1980), cert denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980), United States v. Hayes, 653 F.2d 8 (1st Cir.1981). ¶ 4 While it is clear from the record that a motivation of the officers in boarding the boat was to investigate the employee's complaint, the United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lipscomb v. Randall
(2×)
Cumbest, 416 So.2d at 688-89 ; see also Tarrant County v. Ashmore, 635 S.W.2d 417, 421 (Tex.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 452 , 74 L.Ed.2d 606 (1982) (“[A] fundamental principle associated with our republican form of government is that every public officeholder remains in his position at the sufferance and for the benefit of the public, subject to removal from office by edict of the ballot box at the time of the next election, or before that time by any other constitutionally permissible means.”); Bennett v. City of Longview, 268 S.W. 786, 787 (Tex.Civ.App. — Tex-arkana 1925…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forehand v. Florida State Hospital
See also Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 820-24 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 452, 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982) (finding applicant flow data extremely useful in detecting and proving discrimination). 50 Further, appellants argue that the Supreme Court's decision in Ward's Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio, 490 U.S. 642 , 109 S.Ct. 2115 , 104 L.Ed.2d 733 (1989), is dispositive of the statistical issue in this case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forehand v. Florida State Hospital at Chattahoochee
See also Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 820-24 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 452, 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982) (finding applicant flow data extremely useful in detecting and proving discrimination).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Omni International Corp.
See, e.g., United States v. McKenzie, 678 F.2d 629, 631 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 685 F.2d 1386 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 450 , 74 L.Ed.2d 604 (1982); United States v. Nembhard, 676 F.2d 193, 200 (6th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 673 F.2d 798, 812 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982) (district court has no duty to recruit new plaintiffs). 65 In sum, while the majority's opinion on this aspect of the case expressly acknowledges both the trial judge's "broad discretion" and the lack of necessity for specific findings, its holding seems compatible with neither principle.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calvin Roderick CARMICHAEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIRMINGHAM SAW WORKS, Defendant-Appellee
We have recognized that such subjective procedures can lead to racial discrimination, both because important information may be available only to whites and because such procedures place no check on individual biases. 2 James, 559 F.2d at 346 ; Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 5 Cir.1972, 457 F.2d 348, 358-59 ; see also Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 5 Cir.1982, 673 F.2d 798, 826-27 , cert. denied, 1982, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R & G Affiliates, Inc. v. Knoll International, Inc.
See also Shop & Save Food Markets, Inc. v. Pneumo Corp., 683 F.2d 27, 30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 450 , 74 L.Ed.2d 604 (1982); Hill v. A-T-O, Inc., 535 F.2d 1349, 1355 (2d Cir.1976). 23 .
Shop & Save Food Markets, Inc.
v.
Pneumo Corp.
v.
Pneumo Corp.
No. 82-550.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.