green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“A corporation may be simultaneously both a defendant and the enterprise under RICO.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Crowe v. Smith
See, e.g., Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 425 (5th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 ; Bishop v. Corbitt Marine Ways, Inc., 802 F.2d 122, 122-23 (5th Cir.1986) (cataloging the circuits addressing this issue); but see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Ivanhoe
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 989-90 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983) and 459 U.S. 1183 , 103 S.Ct. 834 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Amendolare v. Schenkers International Forwarders, Inc.
See, e.g., Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co., 747 F.2d 384, 400 (7th Cir.1984); United States v. Computer Sciences Corp., 689 F.2d 1181, 1190 (4th Cir.1982); but see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 988 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Busby v. Crown Supply, Inc.
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 987-90 (11 Cir.1982) (the only circuit holding that the person and enterprise need not be dis tinct for § 1962(c) purposes), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983). .
cited
Cited "but see"
Hall American Center Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Dick
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 988 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
cited
Cited "but see"
Babst v. Morgan Keegan & Co.
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983) (no distinction required).
cited
Cited "but see"
Bumgarner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 988 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
cited
Cited "but see"
Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 988 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 1014 (1983).
cited
Cited "but see"
Levine v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 987-90 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Abelson v. Strong
Bennett v. United States Trust Co. of New York, 770 F.2d 308, 315 (2d Cir.1985) (citing cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 800 , 88 L.Ed.2d 776 (1986); but see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 988 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. George I. Benny
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 987-90 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983) (corporation may be both liable “person” and related “enterprise”).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Grant v. Union Bank
But see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 988 (11th Cir.) (“A corporation may be simultaneously both a defendant and the enterprise under RICO.”), reh. denied, 688 F.2d 852 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
Hirsch v. Enright Refining Company, Inc., 751 F.2d 628, 633-34 (3rd Cir.1984); Haroco v. American National Bank and Trust Company, 747 F.2d 384, 399-402 (7th Cir.1984), aff'd on other grounds, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3291 , 87 L.Ed.2d 437 (1985); United States v. Computer Sciences Corp., 689 F.2d 1181, 1190-91 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 (1983); Bennet v. Berg, 685 F.2d 1053, 1061-62 (8th Cir.1982), aff'd on rehearing, 710 F.2d 1361 (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1008 , 104 S.Ct. 527 , 78 L.Ed.2d 710 (1983); but see United States v. Hartley, 67…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Richard D. BENNETT and Carole A. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee
a corporation may be simultaneously both a defendant and the enterprise under rico.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ames Sintering Co. Jose (Joseph) 1. Cornudella Patrick L. Dillon
he fiction was never intended to prohibit the imposition of criminal liability by allowing a corporation or its agents to hide behind the identity of the other.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Hofbauer
See Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F.2d 629, 634 (7th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1983) (citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)).
cited
Cited "see"
DeWane v. McGinty (In Re McGinty)
See, United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoefer v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 971-72 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hoefer v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 971-72 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kimberlin v. Dewalt
See Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F.2d 629 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1983). 48 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilbert W. Galvan v. John M. Hurley
See Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F.2d 629, 634 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 (1983); Bryant v. Grinner, 563 F.2d 871, 872 (7th Cir.1977) (dictum); Sutherland v. McCall, 709 F.2d 730, 732 (D.C.Cir.1983); Northington v. United States Parole Comm'n, 587 F.2d 2 (6th Cir.1978); Smith v. United States, 577 F.2d 1025 (5th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Marshall v. City of Atlanta (In re Air Terminal Enterprises, Inc.)
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 986 , reh’g denied, 688 F.2d 852 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (4).
cited
Cited "see"
Marshall v. City of Atlanta
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 986 , reh'g denied, 688 F.2d 852 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (4).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernan Francisco Perez-Tosta, Gustavo Javier Correa-Patino, Erasmo Perez-Aguilera, Luis Guillermo Rojas-Valdez
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 977 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); compare Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(d)(2) 'with Fed.R.Evid. 404(b).
discussed
Cited "see"
Juan Rivera v. United States
See Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F.2d 629, 634 (7th Cir.1982) (four-month delay not unreasonable per se but raises due process questions), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 (1983). 23 The second factor is the reason for the delay.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lively
See United States v. Scarfo, 685 F.2d 842, 849 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gelb v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See H.J., Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 954 F.2d 485, 491 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 2306 , 119 L.Ed.2d 228 (1992) (explaining nonapplication of filed rate doctrine in City of Kirkwood v. Union Electric Co., 671 F.2d 1173 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 814 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1013 .(1983), in that antitrust damages based on price squeeze did not conflict with agency control over rates because plaintiff did not challenge reasonableness determinations); Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Alabama Power Co., 824 F.2d 1465, 1471-72 (5th Cir.1987) (stating …
cited
Cited "see"
Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639 James F. Woodward v. Michael Dipalermo Maria Triggs, Secretary/treasurer, Yellow Bus Lines
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 989-90 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 989-90 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gambino
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 992 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); United States v. Aleman, 609 F.2d 298, 306 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980); United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564, 571 (9th Cir. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Posey v. Bank of Shaw (In Re Posey)
See, United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Antonio Giraldo
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 977 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); Fed.R.Crim.P. 16 Advisory Committee Note.
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick Leo Edwards v. Calvin Edwards
See Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F.2d 629, 633 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 (1983). 7 Therefore, we affirm the district court's judgment denying the petition pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Stobbs
See Hanahan v. Luther (C.A.7, 1982), 693 F. 2d 629, 634 , certiorari denied (1983), 459 U.S. 1170 .
cited
Cited "see"
Faheem-El v. Klincar
See Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F.2d 629, 634 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players Association
(2×)
The Court reiterated that “the legislative history of § 301 clearly reveals Congress’ intent to shield individual employees from liability for damages arising from their breach of ... a collective bargaining agreement.” Id. at 407, 101 S.Ct. at 1840 ; accord Hardline Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1547, 680 F.2d 622 , 624 n. 1 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 814 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Faheem-El v. Klincar
See Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F.2d 629, 634-35 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Downie v. Klincar
Id. at 483 , 92 S.Ct. at 2601 ; see also Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F.2d 629, 633 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1983); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Wedtech Corp.
Compare Medallion TV Enterprises, Inc. v. SelectTV of California, Inc., 627 F.Supp. 1290, 1294-95 (C.D.Cal.1986) (collecting cases), affirmed, 833 F.2d 1360 (9th Cir.1987) (separate person) with United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 988 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 1183, 103 S.Ct. 815 , 834, 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 , 1027 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerardo v. NJ State Parole Bd.
See also Hanahan v. Luther, 693 F. 2d 629, 635 (7th Cir.1982), cert. den. 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 1013 (1983) *452 (eight month delay in parole revocation hearing not violative of due process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minnesota Odd Fellows Home Foundation v. Engler & Budd Co.
Compare Bennett v. Berg with United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir. 1982) (entity “may be simultaneously both a defendant and the enterprise under RICO”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schofield v. First Commodity Corp. of Boston
See, e.g., United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 987-90 (11th Cir.1982) (corporation can be defendant and “enterprise” in criminal RICO prosecution), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 1183, 103 S.Ct. 815 , 834, 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); Bernstein v. IDT Corp., 582 F.Supp. 1079, 1082-84 (D.Del.1984) (respondeat superior applies in civil RICO case to make employer/“enterprise” potentially liable for violations of employee/“person”); B.F.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Griffin v. O'Neal, Jones & Feldman, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 986 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); United States v. Benny, 559 F.Supp. 264 (N.D.Cal.1983). 4 But a sufficient number has approved and adopted our reasoning, 5 and we are satisfied that, until a contrary decision issues from our parent circuit or the Supreme Court, our thinking remains sound.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power Company, Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power Company
See, e.g., City of Kirkwood v. Union Electric Co., 671 F.2d 1173 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 814 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tommy Lynn Weathersby v. Conoco Oil Company, Conoco Oil Company v. Global Marine, and National Supply Company
Note, Contractual Indemnity Under Maritime and Louisiana Law, 43 La.L.Rev. 189 (1982); see also Boudreaux v. American Workover, Inc., 664 F.2d 463, 466 (5th Cir.1981), on reh’g en banc, 680 F.2d 1034 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); Pippen v. Shell Oil Co., 661 F.2d 378, 384 (5th Cir.1981). 2 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Frank Romano and Thomas Romano, Cross-Appellees. In Re United States of America
See e.g., United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.
(2×)
See also, e. g., United States v. Hartley, 678 F. 2d 961, 971-972 (CA11 1982), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1170 (1983); Alamo Fence Co. of Houston v. United States, 240 F. 2d 179 (CA5 1957); Patterson v. United States, 222 F. 599, 618-619 (CA6), cert. denied, 238 U. S. 635 (1915); Union Pacific Coal Co. v. United States, 173 F. 737 (CA8 1909); United States v. Consolidated Coal Co., 424 F. Supp. 577, 579-581 (SD Ohio 1976); United States v. Griffin, 401 F. Supp. 1222, 1224-1225 (SD Ind. 1975), aff'd mem. sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lindquist v. Department of Labor & Industries
See also Schwabenland v. Sanger Boats, 683 F.2d 309 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 74 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saine v. A.I.A., Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 986-90 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); United States v. Benny, 559 F.Supp. 264 (N.D.Cal.1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert W. Kirk & Associates, Inc.
v.
Holcomb
v.
Holcomb
No. 81-1109.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1) · Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.