green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“prosecution must ‘prove that the accused concealed himself with the intent to avoid arrest or prosecution.’ ”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Owens
prosecution must 'prove that the accused concealed himself with the intent to avoid arrest or prosecution.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sandra M. v. Jeremy M.
See Kudler v. Smith, 643 P.2d 783 (Colo.App.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 837 , 103 S.Ct. 83 , 74 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982) (holding that Colorado, as the "home state,” had jurisdiction to modify New York custody decree where denial of maternal grandparents' visitation rights deemed in best interests of children); Gordey v. Graves, 528 So.2d 1319 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1988) (holding that Florida court should have assumed jurisdiction to consider grandparents' petition to modify custody provisions of Nevada divorce decree where Florida was child’s “home state” and child's only "significant connectio…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santos Hernan Rivera-Ventura
See United States v. Gonsalves, 675 F.2d 1050, 1052-53 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 837 , 103 S.Ct. 83 , 74 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982) (§ 3290 “den[ies] the benefits of all statutes of limitations to a person fleeing from justice in any federal jurisdiction” (emphasis in original)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of Brandon L.E.
See Kudler v. Smith, 643 P.2d 783 (Colo.App.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 837 , 103 S.Ct. 83 , 74 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982) (Colorado, as the “home state,” had jurisdiction to modify New York custody decree where denial of maternal grandparents’ visitation rights deemed in best interests of children); Gordey v. Graves, 528 So.2d 1319 (Fla.App.1988) (Florida court should have assumed jurisdiction to consider grandparents’ petition to modify custody provisions of Nevada divorce decree where Florida was child’s “home state” and child’s only “significant connection” with Nevada was res…
cited
Cited "see"
Counts v. Bracken
See Kudler v. Smith, 643 P.2d 783 (Colo.App. 1981), cert. denied 459 U.S. 837 , 103 S.Ct. 83 , 74 L.Ed.2d 78 .
examined
Cited "see"
Nation v. Nation
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Kudler v. Smith, Colo.App., 643 P.2d 783 (1981), cert. denied 459 U.S. 837 , 103 S.Ct. 83 , 74 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982); and In re Seright, Colo.App., 649 P.2d 730 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Indiana Federation of Dentists, an Unincorporated Association v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
Accord Boddicker v. Arizona State Dental Ass'n, 680 F.2d 66 , 68 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 837 , 103 S.Ct. 83 , 74 L.Ed.2d 79 (1982) (no arguments presented to demonstrate an adverse effect on competition between dentists).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dominguez-Mestas
See, e.g., U.S. v. Gonsalves, 675 F.2d 1050, 1053-1054 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 837 , 103 S.Ct. 83 , 74 L.Ed. 78 (1982); U.S. v. Guess, 629 F.2d 573 , 577 n. 4 (9th Cir.1980); See also, Manual of Model Jury Instructions for the Ninth Circuit, Section 6.04, p. 94 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bakke v. District Court In & For the Fourth Judicial District
Because the Oklahoma court did not have jurisdiction “substantially in accordance” with the Colorado Custody Act, the Colorado court has jurisdiction to modify the Oklahoma court’s original decree granting custody to Bakke. 8 See McCarron, 671 P.2d 953 (district court abused discretion by declining to take jurisdiction in a custody case where litigation in Colorado was appropriate because child and family resided in state, significant evidence concerning care was in Colorado, and there had been an erosion of connections with Oklahoma); Wheeler, 186 Colo. 218 , 526 P.2d 658 (Colorado has …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bakke v. DISTRICT COURT 4TH JUD. DIST.
Because the Oklahoma court did not have jurisdiction "substantially in accordance" with the Colorado Custody Act, the Colorado court has jurisdiction to modify the Oklahoma court's original decree granting custody to Bakke. [8] See McCarron, 671 P.2d 953 (district court abused discretion by declining to take jurisdiction in a custody case where litigation in Colorado was appropriate because child and family resided in state, significant evidence concerning care was in Colorado, and there had been an erosion of connections with Oklahoma); Wheeler, 186 Colo. 218 , 526 P.2d 658 (Colorado has juri…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp.
v.
Corporation Commission of Oklahoma and Harper Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma
v.
Corporation Commission of Oklahoma and Harper Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma
No. 81-2329; No. 81-2330.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)
Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 651 P. 2d 652.