discussed Cited "see, e.g." Snyder v. Murray City Corporation Read properly, in the factual and historical context that anchors the case, Marsh does not vest a governmental body with such powers. 44 Marsh states that "[t]he question presented is whether the Nebraska Legislature's practice of opening each legislative day with a prayer by a chaplain paid by the State violates the Establishment Clause." 463 U.S. at 784 , 103 S.Ct. 3330 ; see also id. at 786 , 103 S.Ct. 3330 ("We granted certiorari limited to the challenge to the practice of opening sessions with prayers by a State-employed clergyman.") (citing 459 U.S. 966 , 103 S.Ct. 292 , 74 L.Ed.2d 276 (…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Snyder v. Murray City Corp. Marsh states that “[t]he question presented is whether the Nebraska Legislature’s practice of opening each legislative day with a prayer by a chaplain paid by the State violates the Establishment Clause.” 463 U.S. at 784 , 103 S.Ct. 3330 ; see also id. at 786 , 103 S.Ct. 3330 (“We granted certiorari limited to the challenge to the practice of opening sessions with prayers by a State-employed clergyman.”) (citing 459 U.S. 966 , 103 S.Ct. 292 , 74 L.Ed.2d 276 (Nov. 1,1982)).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Snyder v. Murray City Corp. Marsh states that “[t]he question presented is whether the Nebraska Legislature’s practice of opening each legislative day with a prayer by a chaplain paid by the State violates the Establishment Clause.” 463 U.S. at 784 ; see also id. at 786 (“We granted certiorari limited to the challenge to the practice of opening sessions with prayers by a State-employed clergyman.”) (citing 459 U.S. 966 (Nov. 1, 1982)).