green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See State v. Stokes, 638 S.W.2d 715, 720 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1017 , 103 S.Ct. 1263 , 75 L.Ed.2d 488 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Richardson v. State , 376 So.2d 205 , 224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), affirmed, 376 So.2d 228 (Ala. 1979), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1017 , 103 S.Ct. 1262 , 75 L.Ed.2d 488 (1983); Murry v. State , 562 So.2d 1348 , 1358 , (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), Duren v. State , 507 So.2d 111 , 12021 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), affirmed, 507 So.2d 121 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 249 , 98 L.Ed.2d 206 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Dale Henderson v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
See Hill v. State, 422 So.2d 816, 818-19 (Fla.1982), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1017 , 103 S.Ct. 1262 , 75 L.Ed.2d 488 (1983) (no impermissible doubling of aggravating factors where murder/rape sufficiently torturous and where decision to murder was made substantially before the crime); see also Mills v. State, 462 So.2d 1075, 1081 (Fla.) (no impermissible doubling where prospect of murder created mental anguish in victim and murder sufficiently premeditated), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 911 , 105 S.Ct. 3538 , 87 L.Ed.2d 661 (1985). 47 .
cited
Cited "see"
BD. OF EDUC. OF TAOS MUN. SCH. v. Singleton
See United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co., 98 N.M. 633 , 651 P.2d 1277 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1017 , 103 S.Ct. 1262 , 75 L.Ed.2d 488 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Stepter
(2×)
State v. Strawther, 476 S.W.2d 576, 579-80 (Mo.1972); see also State v. Stokes, 638 S.W.2d 715, 719-20 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1017, 103 S.Ct. 1263 , 75 L.Ed.2d 488 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nave
(2×)
See also, the concurring opinion of Higgins, J., in State v. Stokes, 638 S.W.2d 715, 725 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1017 , 103 S.Ct. 1263 , 75 L.Ed.2d 488 (1983), where Judge Higgins declares Arnold is not persuasive, and states that while a finding of "substantial history" requires subjective analysis, so does a jury's collective understanding of such terms as reasonable doubt, and that the mere fact that the phrase is not measurable with mathematical precision does not render it impermissibly vague.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blanco v. State
Compare Hill v. State, 422 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1017 , 103 S.Ct. 1262 , 75 L.Ed.2d 488 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Card v. State
See, e.g., Hill v. State, 422 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1017 , 103 S.Ct. 1262 , 75 L.Ed.2d 488 (1983) (victims were stripped, beaten and tortured over a period of hours before being killed); Middleton v. State, 426 So.2d 548 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 3573 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1413 (1983) (where defendant sat for hours holding a shotgun and thinking about killing the victim); Jent v. State (involving a lengthy series of events including beating, transporting, raping, and setting the still living victim on fire); Combs v. State, 403 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1981), cer…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Atomic Co.
v.
United Nuclear Corp.
v.
United Nuclear Corp.
No. 82-1104.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1983.
Brennan, Certiorari.
Published
Sup. Ct. N. M. Motion of petitioner to substitute GA Technologies, Inc., as party petitioner denied. Certio-rari denied.
Justice Brennan and Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.