green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Perryman v. State
(2×)
Further, a jury trial is "fundamental to the American scheme of justice..." Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149 [, 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 ] (1968); accord Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 [, 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 ] (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gartman
See United States v. Head, 641 F.2d 174, 181 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marquez v. State
(2×)
Further, a jury trial is "fundamental to the American scheme of justice ..." Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149 , 88 S.Ct. 1444, 1447 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); accord Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Steven M. Jacob v. Harold Clarke, Director, Nebraska Department of Corrections
The Seventh Circuit has decided a good portion of it — “a defendant who did not move for a mistrial on the basis of intentional prosecutorial misconduct cannot invoke the double jeopardy clause to bar the state from retrying him after his conviction is reversed on that ground.” Beringer v. Sheahan, 934 F.2d 110, 114 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1006 , 112 S.Ct. 641 , 116 L.Ed.2d 658 (1991); accord United States v. Head, 697 F.2d 1200, 1206 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Chaouachi v. State
See Samudio v. State, 635 S.W.2d 183, 185 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.1982], aff'd, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eckert International, Inc. v. Government of the Sovereign Democratic Republic of Fiji
See United States v. Head, 697 F.2d 1200 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983). 14 In order for an interlocutory appeal to be deemed frivolous, it must be both meritless and substantively inappropriate.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris County District Attorney's Office v. D.W.B.
See Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312, 313 (Tex.Crim.App.), cer t. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983). 2 Appel-lee sought by his habeas application to be discharged “from further confinement pursuant to the illegal judgment and sentence [in the 1981 county criminal court at law case].” On November 2,1990, the trial court granted habeas corpus relief and noted in its handwritten order, “judgment in cause No. 630920 set aside and vacated.” The State did not appeal the grant of habeas corpus relief.
cited
Cited "see"
Putnam v. United States
See, U.S. v. M/V Big Sam, 693 F.2d 451 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Beringer v. O'Grady
See United States v. Head, 697 F.2d 1200 , 1206 & n. 10 (4th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Freedlander v. Edens Broadcasting, Inc.
Assoc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 , 90 S.Ct. 1537 , 26 L.Ed.2d 6 (1970), the Supreme Court employed the standard of whether even the most “careless reader” would perceive that the allegedly defamatory language was no more than “rhetorical hyperbole.” Id., at 14 , 90 S.Ct. at 1541 ; see Pring v. Penthouse International, Ltd., 695 F.2d 438 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Colin Brooks Anderson, A/K/A Colin Taylor, United States of America v. Kathryn Anderson, A/K/A Kathy A. Alfonsi, and Kathy's Kranes and Construction Co., Inc., United States of America v. Larry Vincent Nurre, United States of America v. Richard Carl Lundin, United States of America v. Lundin Construction Co., Inc., A/K/A Lundin Construction, United States of America v. Donald Richard Showalter
See United States v. Head, 641 F.2d 174, 181 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983). 51 IV.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anderson
See United States v. Head, 641 F.2d 174, 181 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. West Of England Ship Owner's Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association (Luxembourg)
See United States v. M/V Big Sam, 681 F.2d 432, 437 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. West of England Ship Owner's Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg)
See United States v. M/V Big Sam, 681 F.2d 432, 437 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mendoza v. Gallup Independent Co.
See Pring v. Penthouse Int’l, Ltd., 695 F.2d 438 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983); Catalfo v. Jensen, 657 F.Supp. 463 (D.N.H.1987); Ollman v. Evans.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Adams
See United States v. Head, 697 F.2d 1200, 1210 (4th Cir.1982) (while Court was troubled by conduct of trial, with 2,470 interjections by trial judge over five days, Court could not conclude the defendant's fair trial rights were prejudiced), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 (1983); United States v. Johnson, 657 F.2d 604, 606 (4th Cir.1981) ("fair analysis of the transcript indicates clearly that the efforts of the judge were in the interest of expediting the case, and were within the legitimate bounds of comment by the trial court in the course of the proceedings"). 14 Another complaint of Adams is…
discussed
Cited "see"
Henderson v. Times Mirror Co.
See Pring v. Penthouse Int’l., 695 F.2d 438, 442 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983) (held First Amendment considerations applicable to defamation also apply to torts of “false light” and “outrageous conduct”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Lewis Singer
(2×)
See United States v. Head, 697 F.2d 1200 , 1206 n. 10 (4th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983); Robinson v. Wade, 686 F.2d 298, 305-09 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. Curtis, 683 F.2d 769, 772-76 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 379 , 74 L.Ed.2d 512 (1982); United States v. Singleterry, 683 F.2d 122, 123-24 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1021 , 103 S.Ct. 387 , 74 L.Ed.2d 518 (1982); United States v. Roberts, 640 F.2d 225, 227-28, 230-31 (9th Cir.) (Norris, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 942 , 101 S.Ct. 3088 , 69 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamid Bahramnia v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Marcello v. I.N.S., 694 F.2d 1033 (5th Cir.) (holding that denial of motion to reopen was not an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983); Ka Fung Chang v. I.N.S., 634 F.2d 248 (5th Cir.1981); Vasquez-Contreras v. I.N.S., 582 F.2d 334 (5th Cir.1978); Sangabi v. I.N.S., 763 F.2d 374, 375 (9th Cir.1985). 7 . 8 C.F.R. § 3.2 (1985). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Refugio Marquez-Medina v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156, 1159 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ankeny v. Governor of State of Indiana
Thus, we cannot say that the trial court erred when it dismissed the Plaintiffs' case. 16 See generally McCalment v. Eli Lilly & Co., 860 N.E.2d 884 (Ind.Ct.App.2007) (holding that the plaintiffs' arguments had been sufficiently addressed by Indiana Supreme Court precedent and therefore the trial court did not err when it granted the defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted); see also, eg., Diaz-Salazar v. I.N.S., 700 F.2d 1156, 1160 (7th Cir.1983) (noting in its recitation of the facts that despite the fact father was not a citizen of the Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Doyle
This is significant because “a defendant who did not move for a mistrial on the basis of intentional prosecutorial misconduct cannot invoke the double jeopardy clause to bar the state from retrying him after his conviction is reversed on that ground.” Beringer v. Sheahan, 934 F.2d 110, 114 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1006 , 112 S.Ct. 641 , 116 L.Ed.2d 658 (1991); see also United States v. Head, 697 F.2d 1200, 1206 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tadeusz Barnas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See also Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 (1983); Bueno-Carillo v. Landon, 682 F.2d 143 (7th Cir.1982). 11 Further, the Board placed special importance on the fact that Barnas's equities were acquired well after the beginning of his deportation proceedings.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jose L. Gamboa-Garibay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See also Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156, 1160 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Morton v. State
See, e.g., Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William Palmer v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See also Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156, 1160 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank v. National Broadcasting Co.
Assn. v Bresler, 398 US 6, 14 ; see also, Pring v Penthouse Intl., 695 F2d 438, cert denied 462 US 1132 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mission Insurance Co.
v.
United States and M/V Big Sam v. United States
v.
United States and M/V Big Sam v. United States
No. 82-1517. No. 82-1541.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1983.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 681 F. 2d 432 and 693 F. 2d 451.