green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mikol v. Barnhart
in order to succeed on a motion pursuant to rule 60(b)(2), the movant must present evidence that is truly newly discovered or ... could not have been found by due diligence.
cited
Cited "see"
Mario Marquez v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Hernandez v. State, 643 S.W.2d 397, 401 (Tex.Crim.App.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patel v. Lutheran Medical Center, Inc.
See United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 493 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983); Burzynski v. Travers, 111 F.R.D. 15, 17 (E.D.N.Y.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Putnam Resources v. Pateman
See United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 493 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
C.L. Taylor, Cross-Appellee v. Texgas Corporation, Cross-Appellant
See United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 493 (2d Cir.) (evidence is not newly discovered where defendant’s attorney admitted that he knew of the evidence prior to the granting of summary judgment and could give no plausible explanation as to why the evidence was not produced earlier), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983). 8 The mere fact that Texgas is a large company does not excuse it from informing its employees of the identity of its legal opponents and from requiring its employees to report any dealings with those opponents to the comp…
discussed
Cited "see"
Burzynski v. Travers
See United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 493 (2d Cir.) (to succeed on a Rule 60(b)(2) motion—standard is the same under Rule 59(a)(2)—movant must present evidence that is “truly newly discovered or ... could not have been found by due diligence”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gemveto Jewelry Co. v. Jeff Cooper, Inc.
See United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 493 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983); Audiovisual Publishers, Inc. v. Cenco, Inc., 580 F.2d 50, 52 (2d Cir.1978); International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 556 F.2d 665, 670 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1014 , 98 S.Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978); see also United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106 , 66 S.Ct. 464 , 90 L.Ed. 562 (1946). 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Capital Cities/ABC Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 493 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendoza v. City of Rome
In Gemveto Jewelry Co., for example, the court found that a “sustained and intensive but unsuccessful” search for the evidence in question prior to and immediately after trial met the due diligence requirement. 613 F.Supp. at 1059 ; see also United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 493 (2d Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York
See, e.g., United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 495 (2d Cir.) (double costs plus $500 attorney’s fee), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983); In re Hartford Textile Corp., 659 F.2d 299 , 306 (2d Cir. 1981) (double costs plus $5,000 attorney’s fee), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastway Construction Corp. v. The City Of New York
See, e.g., United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F.2d 491, 495 (2d Cir.) (double costs plus $500 attorney's fee), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983); In re Hartford Textile Corp., 659 F.2d 299 , 306 (2d Cir.1981) (double costs plus $5,000 attorney's fee), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982). 7 The case law under Rule 11 also reflects the exercise of discretion to award only that portion of a defendant's attorney's fee thought reasonable to serve the sanctioning purpose of the Rule.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Talamini, Administratrix of the Estate of Talamini v. Allstate Insurance Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Potamkin Cadillac Corp. v. United States, 462 U.S. 1144 , 103 S.Ct. 3128 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983) (BURGER, C.J., and REHNQUIST and O'CONNOR, JJ.); Escofil v. Pennsylvania, 462 U.S. 1117 , 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983) (REHNQUIST and O'CONNOR, JJ.); In re Rush, 462 U.S. 1117 , 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983) (BURGER, C.J., and REHNQUIST and O'CONNOR, JJ.); Garcia v. United States, 462 U.S. 1116 , 103 S.Ct. 3083 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983) (BURGER, C.J., and REHNQUIST and O'CONNOR, JJ.); Gullo v. McGill, 462 U.S. 1101 , 103 S.Ct. 2445 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1328 (1983) (BURGER, C…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Department of Revenue of Montana
v.
First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Missoula
v.
First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Missoula
No. 82-1471.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1983.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Sup. Ct. Mont. Motion of Multistate Tax Commission for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.