green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…once admiralty jurisdiction is established, then all of the substantive rules and precepts peculiar to the law of the sea become applicable
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Evergreen Marine Corp. v. Six Consignments of Frozen Scallops
(2×)
once admiralty jurisdiction is established, then all of the substantive rules and precepts peculiar to the law of the sea become applicable
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Torrefaccion Cafe Cialitos, Inc.
(2×)
See Austin v. Unarco Indus., Inc., 705 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
FDIC v. Torrefaccion Cafe
See Austin v. Unarco Indus., Inc., 705 F.2d 1 , 4-5 ___ ______ ___________________ (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: San Juan v.
(2×)
See Austin v. Unarco Indus., Inc., 705 ___ ______ ____________________ F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 (1983); see _____ _________ ___ generally _________ In re Western Real Estate Fund, Inc., 922 F.2d 592, 600 (10th ______________________________________ Cir. 1990), modified on other grounds, 932 F.2d 898 (10th Cir. ________ __ _____ _______ 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Two Appeals Arising Out of the San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation
(2×)
See Austin v. Unarco Indus., Inc., 705 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983); see generally In re Western Real Estate Fund, Inc., 922 F.2d 592 , 600 (10th Cir.1990), modified on other grounds, 932 F.2d 898 (10th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trimec, Inc. v. Zale Corp.
(2×)
See Austin v. Unarco Industries, 705 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983); Williford v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 124, 126-27 (4th Cir.1983); Lynch v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 710 F.2d 1194, 1196-97 (6th Cir.1983); Pitts v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 698 F.2d 313, 314 (7th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara Butler v. American Trawler Company, Inc.
(2×)
See Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 , 6 n. 1 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Butler v. American Trawler Co., Inc.
(2×)
See Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 , 8 n. 3 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Margaret Austin, Etc. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garland Coal & Mining Company v. United Mine Workers of America, District 21, United Mine Workers of America Local 1285, United Mine Workers of America Local 1329, United Mine Workers of America Local 2071, United Mine Workers of America Local 2428, United Mine Workers of America v. Toltec Coal Company and Great Western Enterprises, Inc. Garland Coal & Mining Company v. United Mine Workers of America District 21, United Mine Workers of America Local 1285, United Mine Workers of America Local 1329, United Mine Workers of America Local 2071, United Mine Workers of America Local 2428, United Mine Workers of America, Toltec Coal Company and Great Western Enterprises, Inc. Garland Coal & Mining Company v. United Mine Workers of America District 21, United Mine Workers of America Local 1285, United Mine Workers of America Local 1329, United Mine Workers of America Local 2071, United Mine Workers of America Local 2428, United Mine Workers of America v. Toltec Coal Company and Great Western Enterprises, Inc
(2×)
See Austin v. UNARCO Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garland Coal & Mining Co. v. United Mine Workers of America
(2×)
See Austin v. UNARCO Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel Corporation, Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel Corporation
(2×)
McPhail v. Municipality of Culebra, 598 F.2d 603, 607 (1st Cir.1979); see Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1, 15 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983); Gundy v. United States, 728 F.2d 484, 488 (10th Cir.1984); Herman v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 524 F.2d 767, 772 (3d Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Jay W. Myhran v. Johns-Manville Corporation, and Fibreboard Corporation and Raymark Industries, Inc.
See Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 , 10 n. 4, 12 n. 5 (1st Gir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arora v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
See Lynch v. Johns–Manville Sales Corp., 710 F.2d 1194 , 1196–97 (6th Cir. 1983) (“[i]t is universally acknowledged that an automatic stay of proceedings accorded by § 362 may not be invoked by entities such as sureties, guarantors, co-obligors, or others with a similar legal or factual nexus to the ... debtor”); see also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 , 4–5 (1st Cir. 1983), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 (1983); Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass’n. v. Butler, 803 F.2d 61 , 65 (2nd Cir. 1986); Williford v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 715 F.2d 124 , 126–27 (4th Cir. 19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evergreen v. Six Consignments
See, e.g., Austin v. Unarco Inds., Inc., 705 F.2d 1 , 6 n.1 ___ ____ ______ __________________ (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 (1983) ("once admiral- _____ _________ ty jurisdiction is established, then all of the substantive rules and precepts peculiar to the law of the sea become applicable") (quoting Brance v. Shumann, 445 F.2d 175, 178 (5th Cir. 1971)). ______ _______ The parties have identified no material difference between maritime law and Massachusetts law governing these conversion claims.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New York Corporation v. United Jersey Bank, a New Jersey Banking Corporation Michael Gill and Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation. Michael Gill, Third-Party v. Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New York Corporation Thomas Gill, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Maritime Electric Company, Inc., (n.y.), Third-Party Maritime Electric Co., Inc., (Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendant) and Thomas Gill (Third-Party Defendant)
(2×)
See also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983); Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass'n. v. Butler, 803 F.2d at 65; Williford v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 715 F.2d 124 , 126-27 (4th Cir.1983); Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp., 706 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir.1983); Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 722 F.2d 1289, 1290-91 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1253 , 104 S.Ct. 3537 , 82 L.Ed.2d 842 (1984); Pitts v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 698 F.2d 313, 314 (7th Cir.1983); Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, 7…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maritime Electric Co. v. United Jersey Bank
(2×)
See also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983); Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass’n. v. Butler, 803 F.2d at 65; Williford v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 715 F.2d 124 , 126-27 (4th Cir.1983); Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp., 706 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir.1983); Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 722 F.2d 1289, 1290-91 (6th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1253 , 104 S.Ct. 3537 , 82 L.Ed.2d 842 (1984); Pitts v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 698 F.2d 313, 314 (7th Cir.1983); Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dean v. State
See also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 , 6 n. 1 (1st Cir.1983), cert. den. 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed 2d 1454 (1983); Harville v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 731 F.2d 775, 779 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines
(2×)
See United States v. Reliable Transfer Co., 421 U.S. 397, 407 , 95 S.Ct. 1708, 1713 , 44 L.Ed.2d 251 (1975); Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625, 629 , 79 S.Ct. 406, 409 , 3 L.Ed.2d 550 (1959); see also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1, 5-6 (1st Cir.) (involving a similar claim), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry May v. Transworld Drilling Co.
(2×)
Id. at 1012; see also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983). 27 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mildred v. Drake v. Raymark Industries, Inc., and Third-Party Mildred v. Drake v. Raymark Industries, Inc., and Third-Party Bath Iron Works Corporation, Third-Party
(2×)
The Court concluded that a showing of a "relationship of the wrong to traditional maritime activity is often more sensible and more consonant with the purposes of maritime law than is a purely mechanical application of the locality test." Id. 409 U.S. at 261 , 93 S.Ct. at 501 ; see also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Drake v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
(2×)
The Court concluded that a showing of a “relationship of the wrong to traditional maritime activity is often more sensible and more consonant with the purposes of maritime law than is a purely mechanical application of the locality test.” Id. 409 U.S. at 261 , 93 S.Ct. at 501 ; see also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1247 , 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re All Asbestos Cases
See also, Austin v. Unarco Indus., Inc., 705 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 34 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1454 (1983); Keene Corp. v. United States, 700 F.2d 836, 844 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 195 , 78 L.Ed.2d 171 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Austin
v.
Unarco Industries, Inc.
v.
Unarco Industries, Inc.
No. 82-2164.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 6, 1983.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.