green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Thomas G. Koch v. City of Hutchinson
(4×)
n assessing whether the speech touches upon a matter of public concern, it is important not to equate the public's curiosity about a matter with a matter having societal ramifications.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marathon Finance Co. v. Disharoon
(2×)
a factual dispute does not preclude summary judgment unless ... the disputed fact is outcome determinative under the governing law
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Martin R. Bryan v. Warden, Indiana State Reformatory
the parameter of a consensual search like the question of the voluntariness of the consent itself, is an issue of fact____
discussed
Cited "see"
James P. Roberts v. David C. Broski
(2×)
See O'Connor, 985 F.2d at 1366 , citing Egger v. Phillips, 669 F.2d 497, 502 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S. Ct. 284 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roberts v. Broski
(2×)
See O’Connor, 985 F.2d at 1366 , citing Egger v. Phillips, 669 F.2d 497, 502 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James S. Linton
See United States v. Hardin, 710 F.2d 1231, 1236 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvin Berke
See United States v. Hardin, 710 F.2d 1231 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 286 , 78 L.Ed.2d 263 . 8 Nothing in the record indicates that Mr. Berke attempted to clarify or withdraw his consent after he realized that the officers were going to search, not just “look” inside the suitcase.
cited
Cited "see"
ca5 1989
See United States v. Berick, 710 F.2d 1035, 1037 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 286 , 78 L.Ed.2d 263 (1983); 2 W.
cited
Cited "see"
Crowder v. Sinyard
See United States v. Bench, 710 F.2d 1035, 1037 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 286 , 78 L.Ed.2d 263 (1983); 2 W.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Rancourt
See Thomas v. Cox, 708 F.2d 132, 133 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 (1983); United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183, 1190 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Philip S. Morgan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See United States v. Heise, 709 F.2d 449 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 285 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Leopardi
(2×)
See, e.g., Thomas v. Cox, 708 F.2d 132, 136-37 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atif Beyah Saleem v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See also Thomas v. Cox, 708 F.2d 132, 134-35 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
(2×)
See also Thomas v. Cox, 4th Cir., 708 F.2d *1375 132, 135 n. 2, cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983) (discussing fact that state agent aspect has never been a focal point of Supreme Court decisions on the issue).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald B. Evans
A person’s “conduct can be indicative of the scope of a consensual search.” United States v. Berke, 930 F.2d 1219, 1223 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 269 , 116 L.Ed.2d 221 (1991); see also United States v. Hardin, 710 F.2d 1231, 1236-37 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 286 , 78 L.Ed.2d 263 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cole v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hardin, 710 F.2d 1231, 1237 (7th Cir.1983), cert, denied 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 286 , 78 L.Ed.2d 263 (1983) (graph from a DEA statistical report purporting to show the average retail price and purity of illicit cocaine in the United States offered by government to show defendant's intent to distribute cocaine held admissible under 803(8)(A) despite fact that data was compiled by DEA personnel pursuant to their "statutory mandate to extirpate the drug trade in the United States" since "[t]he compilation of such information for the nonlitigative purpose of identifyi…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard T. Peeples v. Joseph Abramajtys
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 329 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 (1983); First Nat'l Bank v. Hirsch, 535 F.2d 343, 346 (6th Cir.1976) (per curiam).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis J. Domegan v. Joseph Ponte, (Two Cases)
(4×)
See, e.g., Caperton v. Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Co., 585 F.2d 683, 688-89 (4th Cir.1978) (raising "separate document" issue sua sponte)-, see also Parisie v. Greer, 705 F.2d 882, 890-91 (7th Cir.) (Eschbach, J.) (discussing duty of court to raise "separate document” issue sua sponte), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 261 and cert. denied, 464 U.S. 950 , 104 S.Ct. 366 , 78 L.Ed.2d 326 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnhill v. Board of Regents of UW System
(2×)
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 314 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 (1983). ”[H]indsight-based reasoning on immunity issues is precisely what Harlow rejected.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Feit v. John Ward and Eugene Grapa
(2×)
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Danny Thomas v. Dennis Douglas, and Clarence Dupnik, Pima County, Arizona
(2×)
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 322-23 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Williams
(2×)
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 297-98 (7th Cir.) cert. denied 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983) (exemption from civil service protections is not special factor precluding Bivens remedy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Johnson
(2×)
State v. Alexander, 197 Conn. 180, 185 , 496 A.2d 486 (1985); see also Thomas v. Cox, 708 F.2d 132, 135 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S. Ct. 284 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greenberg v. Kmetko
(2×)
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 314-15 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca7 1988
(2×)
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 314-15 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John W. Farries v. Stanadyne/chicago Division
(2×)
A grant of “[sjummary judgment will not lie if the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2510 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 296 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brett C. Kimberlin
(2×)
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 102 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. William Mathis, (Two Cases) Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. William Mathis
(4×)
See Kotarski, 799 F.2d at 1348 (“We do not regard this structure [the OSC] as one that provides ‘meaningful remedies’ to one whose constitutional rights have been violated.”); see also Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 298 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (four judges would permit FBI agent excepted from the CSRA scheme to maintain a Bivens action because “the constitutional rights of federal employees in the workplace which are not protected by statute properly form the basis of a Bivens action”), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank K. Kotarski v. V.L. Cooper, A.E. Navarro, W.J. Tinston, J.H. Kirkpatrick, Naval Air Rework Facility, Capt. P.A. Monroe, in His Official Capacity
(4×)
See also Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 297-98 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (plurality opinion) (exemption of FBI agents from civil service regulations permits Bivens action), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983); but see Broadway v. Block, 694 F.2d 979, 985-86 (5th Cir.1982) (Bivens action not available to contest reassignment).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Knapp v. Whitaker
See also Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 315 (7th Cir.) (en banc ), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pfeil v. Rogers
Co. v. Hammer, 83 F.Supp. 383, 386 (W.D.Va.), rev'd. on other grounds, 177 F.2d 793 (4th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 914 , 70 S.Ct. 575 , 94 L.Ed. 1339 (1950); see also Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292 , 311 n. 19 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pfeil v. Rogers
Co. v. Hammer, 83 F.Supp. 383, 386 (W.D.Va.), rev’d. on other grounds, 177 F.2d 793 (4th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 914 , 70 S.Ct. 575 , 94 L.Ed. 1339 (1950); see also Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292 , 311 n. 19 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Knapp v. Whitaker
See also Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 315 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Whitt
(2×)
As Henry notes, "the mere fact of custody imposes pressures on the accused; confinement may bring into play subtle influences that will make him particularly susceptible to the ploys of undercover Government agents.... [T]he incriminating conversations between Henry and Nichols were facilitated by Nichols' conduct and apparent status as a person sharing a common plight." ( United States v. Henry, supra, 447 U.S. at p. 274 [ 65 L.Ed.2d at p. 124 ]; see also Cahill v. Rushen, supra, 501 F. Supp. at p. 1228 .) [13] However, if an informant interrogates an accused, but acts on his own initiative r…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alliance to End Repression v. City of Chicago, and United States Department of Justice
(2×)
See Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 324-25 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (Posner, J. concurring), cer t. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983); id. 710 F.2d at 325-28 (Coffey, J. concurring).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jimmie McBee v. Jim Hogg County, Texas and Gilbert Ybanez, Javier Alfonso Hinojosa v. Jim Hogg County, Texas
See, e.g., Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983); Gonzalez v. Benavides, 712 F.2d 142 (5th Cir.1983); Rookard v. Health and Hospitals Corp., 710 F.2d 41 (2d Cir.1983); McGee v. So.
Parisie
v.
Greer, Warden, Menard Correctional Center
v.
Greer, Warden, Menard Correctional Center
No. 83-5300.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1983.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.