green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“in the interest of judicial economy res judicata may properly be raised by a district court sua sponte ”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Genrad, Inc.
in the interest of judicial economy res judicata may properly be raised by a district court sua sponte
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Storer
(2×)
Likewise, it was rational for Congress to want "to create nationwide uniformity by establishing one list of exemptions contained in the federal Bankruptcy Code." Id. at 282-83.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Storer v. French (In re Storer)
(2×)
Likewise, it was rational for Congress to want “to create nationwide uniformi ty by establishing one list of exemptions contained in the federal Bankruptcy Code.” Id. at 282-83.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Matter of Nehring
The court recognized the “fresh start” purpose of the Bankruptcy Code but found that “the clear language of the statute takes precedence over the more general rehabilitative policies underlying the Act.” Id. at 284.
cited
Cited "see"
Azar-O'Bannon v. Azar
See O'Bannon v. Azar, 435 So.2d 1144 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 441 So.2d 749 (La.1983), cert. denied, O'Bannon v. Azar, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed. 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schnelle v. Soo Line Railroad
See, Landfried v. Terminal Railroad Ass’n, 721 F.2d 254, 255 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1712 , 80 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984) (claims for retaliatory discrimination for filing FELA claim are without jurisdiction of Federal Courts); Shrader v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir.1995) (citing cases from the Fifth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Circuits).
discussed
Cited "see"
J. Aron & Co. v. Chown
See In re Berkley Curtis Bay Co., 569 F.Supp. 1491, 1493 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (“claims in admiralty, for which Section 1333 supplies jurisdiction, have been traditionally tried to the court and are not entitled to jury trial.”), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1431 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of Alex Brown v. Goldberg (In Re Goldberg)
See United Home Rentals v. Texas Real Estate Comm’n, 716 F.2d 324, 330 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1712 , 80 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); State of Nevada Employees Assoc., Inc. v. Keating, 903 F.2d 1223, 1225 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 999 , 111 S.Ct. 558 , 112 L.Ed.2d 565 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mississippi Vocational Rehabilitation for Blind
See Int’l Union of Electrical, etc. v. Ingram Mfg., Co., 715 F.2d 886, 890 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Beeman v. Island Breakers
See Angora Enterprises, Inc. v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Greer
(2×)
See In re Pine, 717 F.2d 281 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984) (involving state law which defined exempt property as including only a debt- or's equity in the property); In re McManus, 681 F.2d 353 (5th Cir.1982) (involving state law which provided that a debtor may not claim an exemption from seizure of property to enforce chattel mortgage).
cited
Cited "see"
Plaza Towers N. Condo v. Plaza Rec. Dev.
See Angora Enterprises v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832, 835 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984), and Association of Golden Glades, Condo.
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. Snow (In Re Snow)
See, Giles v. Credithrift of America, Inc, (In re *188 Pine), 717 F.2d 281 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed. 183 (1984); McManus v. Avco Financial Services (Matter of McManus), 681 F.2d 353 (5th Cir.1982); In re Shines, 39 B.R. 879 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Dominion Bank of the Cumberlands, Na v. James R. Nuckolls Judy M. Nuckolls
(4×)
See Giles v. Credithrift of America, Inc. (In re Pine), 717 F.2d 281 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); McManus v. Avco Financial Services of Louisiana, Inc. (Matter of McManus), 681 F.2d 353 (5th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gord v. State
See Moore v. State , 441 So.2d 1003 , 1004-06 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); State v. Witwer , 642 P.2d 828 , 831-32 (Alaska App. 1982); State v. Yaritz , 287 N.W.2d 13 , 15 (Minn. 1979). "[T]he nexus between the objects to be seized and the premises searched can be established from the particular circumstances involved and need not rest on direct observation." United States v. Lockett , 674 F.2d 843 , 846 (11th Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca5 1987
(2×)
Compare In re Bland, 793 F.2d 1172 (11th Cir.1986) (en banc), questioning In re Hall, 752 F.2d 582 (11th Cir.1985) (holding that state law limiting exemptions on personal property encumbered by non-purchase money, non-possessory liens did not preclude operation of Sec. 522(f)), with In re Pine, 717 F.2d 281 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984) (agreeing with Fifth Circuit position).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bessent v. United States
(2×)
Compare In re Bland, 793 F.2d 1172 (11th Cir.1986) (en banc), questioning In re Hall, 752 F.2d 582 (11th Cir.1985) (holding that state law limiting exemptions on personal property encumbered by non-purchase money, non-possessory liens did not preclude operation of § 522(f)), with In re Pine, 717 F.2d 281 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984) (agreeing with Fifth Circuit position).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bishop v. State
(2×)
See also Moore v. State, 441 So.2d 1003, 1006 (Ala.Cr.App.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bishop v. State
(2×)
See also Moore v. State , 441 So.2d 1003 , 1006 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union Local No. 4-23 v. American Petrofina Co. Of Texas
(2×)
See also International Union of Electric, Radio and Machine Workers v. Ingram Manufacturing Co., 715 F.2d 886, 890 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984). 19 There is no inference in the record or the briefs that any of the first three possible disqualifications apply to Hildabridle's discharge.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack W. McClain v. Gilbert Apodaca, Kent Rogers, Coronado Financial Corporation and Audio Security, Inc., Edward M. Link and Carl F. Agren
See also United Home Rentals, Inc. v. Texas Real Estate Comm’n, 716 F.2d 324, 330 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1712 , 80 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); Boone v. Kurtz, 617 F.2d 435, 436 (5th Cir.1980); Hicks v. Holland, 235 F.2d 183, 183 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 855 , 77 S.Ct. 83 , 1 L.Ed.2d 66 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Lawrence Granger and Dixie Granger. Lawrence Eugene Granger and Dixie Lee Granger, Debtors-Appellants v. Ronald Watson, Trustee-Appellee
See e.g., Giles v. Credithrift of America, Inc. (In re Pine), 717 F.2d 281 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); First National Bank of Mobile v. Norris, 701 F.2d 902 (11th Cir.1983); McManus v. Avco Financial Services of Louisiana, Inc. (In re McManus), 681 F.2d 353 (5th Cir.1982); In re Sullivan, 680 *1491 F.2d 1131 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 992 , 103 S.Ct. 349 , 74 L.Ed.2d 388 (1982).
Paul
v.
Haley
v.
Haley
No. 83-1304.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 2, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.