green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Nuckolls
But see United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984) (holding that the warrant allowing the seizure of papers, including currency, evidencing failure to file currency transaction reports as required by law was unconstitutionally vague because it lacked objective guidelines to aid determination of what may be seized.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Kow Helen Kim Noi Soo and Hong Tho Luu
See United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Lowe
Accord United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 655 (9th Cir.) (quoted with approval in Lucas, 932 F.2d at 1216 ), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Johnson
See United States v. Crisco, 725 F.2d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 (1984). 24 Finally, the government attorney's small talk during the five minute car ride was not reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Booker T. Duke
See United States v. McDonald, 723 F.2d 1288, 1292-93 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yung
See United States v. Crisco, 725 F.2d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir.1984) (determination of whether a defendant was subjected to custodial interrogation is a factual determination), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984); see generally Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 , 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1612 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lavers
(2×)
See United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654-55 (9th Cir.) (using similar reasoning in holding search and seizure of a microcassette proper), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984); cf. United States v. Falcon, 766 F.2d 1469, 1476 (10th Cir.1985) ("once the agents were justified in seizing the tape, no additional authority was necessary for the agents to play the tape"); United States v. Bonfiglio, 713 F.2d 932, 937 (2d Cir.1983) (same). [4] For the reasons stated above, we conclude that the warrant was valid and the search was not illegally extended.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Coleman
See United States v Gomez-Soto, 723 F2d 649, 652 (CA 9, 1984), cert den 466 US 977 (1984), where the court upheld the search of the defendant’s "Gucci” briefcase during the execution of a valid search of his premises.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Riley, Norman Burnett, Jeffrey Sizemore, Vincent Mazza
(2×)
See United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.) (“Since the DEA sought articles it claims are typically found in the possession of narcotics traffickers, the warrant could have named or described those particular articles.” Because “the government could have drafted a warrant to get what it wanted without authorizing an exploratory general search,” the overbroad warrant was invalid.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Hudson v. Commonwealth
See Blair v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 636 , 408 A.2d 907 (1979), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Montano Disla
See United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984); W.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jude R. Hayes
(2×)
The touchstone of the particularity requirement is whether the warrant ensures that "[a]s to what is to be taken, nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant." Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192, 196 , 48 S.Ct. 74, 76 , 72 L.Ed. 231 (1927); Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463, 480 , 96 S.Ct. 2737, 2748 , 49 L.Ed.2d 627 (1976); see United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 653 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zhen Zhou Wu
United States v. Pietri, 683 F.2d 877, 879-80 (5th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 859 (7th Cir.1984) (“To establish conspiracy [to distribute L.S.D.] the items believed to be L.S.D. need not in fact be L.S.D.”), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984); United States v. Murray, 527 F.2d 401, 408-09 (5th Cir.1976) (conspiracy to distribute heroin even though substance turned out to be lactose). “[T]he impossibility that the defendants’ conduct would result in consummation of the contemplated substantive crime is not persuasive or con…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Gall
(2×)
See In re D.F.L., 931 P.2d 448, 451-52 (Colo.1997); People v. Press, 633 P.2d 489, 492-93 (Colo.App.1981) (upholding officer's removal and subsequent search of defendant's safe at another location where safe was reasonably believed to contain items sought pursuant to a valid search warrant); see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654-55 (9th Cir.1984) (upholding seizure of briefcase where warrant authorized seizure of books, papers, diaries, and receipts), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clarence Burgess v. Gary R. McCaughtry
"The test for validity is not whether the indictment could have been framed in a more satisfactory manner, but whether it conforms to minimal constitutional standards." Id.; see also United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 850 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 (1984). 4 The complaint and the information charged Burgess with "attempt[ing] to cause the death of another human being, Cynthia Flowers, with intent to kill that person." Notwithstanding the lack of a citation to the attempt statute, Burgess was informed of all of the essential elements of the crime and given actual notice of the na…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Martinez
See, e.g., United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 851 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S. Ct. 2360 , 80 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Olano
See United States v. Guerrero-Peralta, 446 F.2d 876, 877 (9th Cir.1971) (holding that defense counsel’s assertion that defendant has consented, even if defendant acquiesces in defense counsel’s assertion is insufficient to waive jury of 12 requirement under Rule 23(b)); United States v. Reyes, 603 F.2d 69, 71 (9th Cir. 1979) (concluding that “the defendant’s expression of consent on the record must appear at the time the stipulation is made” in order to meet Rule 23(b)’s waiver requirements (emphasis added)); see also United States v. Crisco, 725 F.2d 1228, 1230 (9th Cir.), cert. d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Guy W. Olano, Jr., United States of America v. Raymond M. Gray
See United States v. Guerrero-Peralta, 446 F.2d 876, 877 (9th Cir.1971) (holding that defense counsel's assertion that defendant has consented, even if defendant acquiesces in defense counsel's assertion is insufficient to waive jury of 12 requirement under Rule 23(b)); United States v. Reyes, 603 F.2d 69, 71 (9th Cir.1979) (concluding that "the defendant's expression of consent on the record must appear at the time the stipulation is made" in order to meet Rule 23(b)'s waiver requirements (emphasis added)); see also United States v. Crisco, 725 F.2d 1228, 1230 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Calvin MacKlin Jr. And Arthur Garfield Swain
Id.; see also United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 852 (7th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Sweeney, 688 F.2d 1131, 1140 (7th Cir.1982) (quoting Bermudez, 526 F.2d at 94 )), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mancinone
See, e.g., United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 851 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S. Ct. 2360 , 80 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Saraceno
See, e.g., United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 851 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S. Ct. 2360 , 80 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Calisto, Samuel J.
See, e.g., United States v. McDonald, 723 F.2d 1288, 1293 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984); United States v. Southard, 700 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vastola
Christine, 687 F.2d at 754 (“Materials seized under the authority of those parts of the warrant struck for invalidity must be suppressed, but the *1273 court need not suppress materials seized pursuant to valid portions of the warrant.”); see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph H. Washington
Id. at 78 ; see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 653-54 (9th Cir.) (invalidating portion of a warrant calling for seizure of papers, including currency, evidencing failures to file currency transaction reports as required by Title 31 U.S.C. because it “lacks objective guidelines to aid the determination of what may or may not be seized and is thus unconstitutionally vague”), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Williams, Debbie Williams, Wayne Russell
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984); United States v. Garfoli, 324 F.2d 909, 911 (7th Cir.1963) (with regard to the precursor of Sec. 846: 21 U.S.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blair
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 83-6489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1984.
Published
Pa. Commw. Ct. Certiorari denied.