green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Norm Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc. v. Peterson (In Re Peterson)
See In re Quezada, 718 F.2d 121 , 122 n. 1 (5th Cir.1983) (rejecting Yackel and Humphreys) cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 2662 , 81 L.Ed.2d 368 (1984); In re Sadwin, 3 B.R. 581, 583 (Bankr.M.D.Fla. 1980) (holding dog bite debt dischargeable and noting that contrary precedent was decided by state courts under old law) aff'd by 15 B.R. 884 (M.D.Fla.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wickes Lumber Co. v. Magee (In Re Magee)
(2×)
See Kelt v. Quezada (Matter of Quezada), 718 F.2d 121, 123 (5th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 2662 , 81 L.Ed.2d 368 (1984); Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 704 F.2d 241, 245 (5th Cir.1983); Petty v. Dardar (Matter of Dardar), 620 F.2d 39, 40 (5th Cir.1980); Vickers v. Home Indemnity Co., 546 F.2d 1149, 1150 (5th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Quality Care Medical Equipment Co. v. Bowen (In Re Quality Care Medical Equipment Co.)
See Holloway v. Schweiker, 724 F.2d 1102, 1105 (4th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 2664 , 81 L.Ed.2d 369 (1985) (equal protection claim dismissed where defendant properly and uniformly applied a valid time bar): The essence of Holloway’s complaint, then, is no more than that the proper exercise of a valid statute of limitations has rendered time barred his otherwise meritorious claim- and that therefore a constitutional violation occurred.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lois S. Harris v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
See, e.g., Holloway v. Schweiker, 724 F.2d 1102, 1104 (4th Cir.) (finding no Sanders exception when social security claimant failed to timely petition for reopening of his claim), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 2664 , 81 L.Ed.2d 369 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. US Railroad Ret Bd
See, e.g., Holloway v. Schweiker, 724 F.2d 1102, 1104 (4th Cir.) (finding no Sanders exception when social security claimant failed to timely petition for reopening of his claim), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan (In Re Kaplan)
See also, e.g., In re Quezada, 718 F.2d 121 , 122-23 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 2662 , 81 L.Ed.2d 368 (1984); Horldt, supra, 86 B.R. at 826-27; 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY, ¶523.216, at 523-131 and 523-132 (15th ed. 1990); and Comment, supra, 7 BANKR.DEV.L.J. at 245.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oberlin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6399.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 29, 1984.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.