green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1987 ·
…a defendant may be convicted for the predicate acts which form the basis of a rico charge and subsequently charged under rico
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sun Dun, Inc. of Washington v. Coca-Cola Co.
to the extent that plaintiff is alleging that defendants as a 391 group attempted to or have monopolized the cable industry, this is a claim of oligopoly, and is not cognizable under section 2 of the sherman act.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
O'KEEFE v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
defendant's conduct must have been prompted by a malicious motive unmixed with any other and exclusively directed to injure and damage another.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Persico
a defendant may be convicted for the predicate acts which form the basis of a rico charge and subsequently charged under rico
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Persico
a defendant may be convicted for the predicate acts which form the basis of a rico charge and subsequently charged under rico
discussed
Cited "see"
Information Resources, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.
See Crimpers Promotions, Inc. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 724 F.2d 290, 294 (2d Cir.1983) (Friendly, C.J.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984): Injury to Crimpers was the precisely intended consequence of defendants’ boycott; with respect to that act the injury to Crimpers was even more “direct” than to the producers or stations who defendants concede would have standing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Centennial Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Counter v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant
See generally Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 644 F.2d 460, 464 (5th Cir. Unit A May 1981) ("[a]n en banc decision of our court may be overruled only by subsequent en banc consideration or by the United States Supreme Court” (internal quotations omitted)), aff'd as modified, 722 F.2d 114 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3537 , 82 L.Ed.2d 842 (1984), and cert. denied, 469 U.S. 819 , 105 S.Ct. 90 , 83 L.Ed.2d 37 (1984). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See United States v. Licavoli , 725 F.2d 1040, 1048 (6th Cir.) (criminal trial testimony admissible in subsequent federal RICO trial even though “enterprise” requirement added a new issue, because issues in both trials were sufficiently similar that defendants had the same motive to develop the testimony), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984); DeLuryea v. Winthrop Labs., 697 F.2d 222 , 226-27 (8th Cir.1983) (doctor’s testimony at prior worker's compensation hearing admissible at subsequent products liability suit because "purpose” of earlier testimony wa…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Oregon
See United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, and Klamath Allottees Water Users Association Klamath Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. State of Oregon, Water Resources Department, and William H. Young, Director, United States of America, and Klamath Allottees Water Users Association, Plaintiff-Intervenor, and Klamath Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. State of Oregon, Water Resources Department, and William H. Young, Director, United States of America, and Klamath Allottees Water Users Association, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. State of Oregon, Water Resources Department, and William H. Young, Director, United States of America, and Klamath Allottees Water Users Association Klamath Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. State of Oregon, Water Resources Department, and William H. Young, Director
See United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ad-Vantage Telephone Directory Consultants, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Gte Directories Corporation
See United States v. Cusmano, 729 F.2d 380, 383 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District State of Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant
See id. at 1400-07.
cited
Cited "see"
Stotler v. Geibank Industrial Bank
See Lane v. Arkansas Valley Publishing Co., 675 P.2d 747 (Colo.App.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3534 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
Accord United States v. Lica voli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1047 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3585 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984); United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 757-58 (5th Cir.1978), reh’g en banc on other grounds, 590 F.2d 1379 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 91 , 62 L.Ed.2d 59 (1979); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083 , 1087 & n. 8A (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1072 , 98 S.Ct. 1256 , 1258, 55 L.Ed.2d 775 , 776 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
Accord United States v. Licavoli, 25 F.2d 1040 , 1047 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984); United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 757-58 (5th Cir.1978), reh'g en banc on other grounds, 590 F.2d 1379 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 91 , 62 L.Ed.2d 59 (1979); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083 , 1087 & n. 8A (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1072 , 98 S.Ct. 1256 , 1258, 55 L.Ed.2d 775 , 776 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dorwin Aam
See United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394, 1413 (9th Cir.1983) ("any ambiguity in a treaty must be resolved in favor of the Indians"), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984). 24 First, we believe the trial court placed too great an importance on the treaty makers' use and understanding of certain terms in the treaty.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Kaplan
See United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1046-47 (6th Cir.), ..., cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 [ 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 ] (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aam
See United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394, 1413 (9th Cir.1983) (“any ambiguity in a treaty must be resolved in favor of the Indians”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Official Publications, Inc. v. Kable News Co., Inc.
Justice Stevens, writing for the Court, stated that there was no clear-cut test available to determine what constitutes an antitrust injury: “[T]he infinite variety of claims that may arise make it virtually impossible to announce a black-letter rule that will dictate the result in every case.” Associated General, supra, 459 U.S. at 536 , 103 S.Ct. at 908 ; see, Crimpers Promotions, Inc. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 724 F.2d 290, 295-96 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, Defendants
See United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1046-47 (6th Cir.) (murder and conspiracy to commit murder could serve as two separate predicate acts even though defendants could not have been charged with and punished for both crimes under Ohio law), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Luc Levasseur, A/K/A John, Jack, Jake and George, United States v. Raymond Luc Levasseur, Etc.
(2×)
See United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1047 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984); U.S. v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748 , 757 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083, 1087-89 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
46 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1027, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,935 Caribbean Marine Services Company, Inc., a California Corporation Carlos A. Garcia v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States Anthony Calio, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration William Evans, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Services E.C. Fullerton, Southwest Regional Director, National Marine Fisheries Service, Caroline M. Corp., Inc. Jose R. Rebelo Francisco M. Nunes, Plaintiffs v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States Anthony J. Calio, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration William Evans, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Service E.C. Fullerton, Southwest Regional Director, National Marine Fisheries Service, Defendants
See Balelo v. Baldrige, 724 F.2d 753, 756 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (Balelo ), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984). 3 In 1972, Congress enacted the Marine Mammal Protection Act (Act), 16 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Caribbean Marine Services Co. v. Baldrige
See Balelo v. Baldrige, 724 F.2d 753, 756 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (Balelo), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Levasseur
See United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1047 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984); US. v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748 , 757 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083, 1087-89 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Burnley
II A search of a closely-regulated industry “will be deemed to be reasonable,” New York v. Burger, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 2636, 2643 , 96 L.Ed.2d 601 (1987), if it meets the following three criteria: First, there must be a “substantial” government interest that informs the regulatory scheme pursuant to which the inspection is made Second, the warrantless inspections must be “necessary to further [the] regulatory scheme.” Finally, “the statute’s inspection program, in terms of the certainty and regularity of its application, [must] provid[e] a constitutionally adequate substitu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Burnley
II 81 A search of a closely-regulated industry "will be deemed to be reasonable," New York v. Burger, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 2636, 2643 , 96 L.Ed.2d 601 (1987), if it meets the following three criteria: 82 First, there must be a "substantial" government interest that informs the regulatory scheme pursuant to which the inspection is made 83 .... 84 Second, the warrantless inspections must be "necessary to further [the] regulatory scheme." 85 * * * 86 Finally, "the statute's inspection program, in terms of the certainty and regularity of its application, [must] provid[e] a constitutionally ade…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas P. Bancroft
See United States v. Cusmano, 729 F.2d 380 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 (1984). 13 We do not find any such abuse of discretion here.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John P. Calandra
See United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Pernsley
(2×)
See Donovan v. United Steelworkers, 721 F.2d 126, 127 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Von Bulow by Auersperg v. Von Bulow
See United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984); United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1072 , 98 S.Ct. 1258 , 55 L.Ed.2d 776 (1978). 14 .
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Gordon
See Balelo v. Baldrige, 724 F.2d 753, 756 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Tim Jones Nancy & James Lethcoe Wendy Simpson Alaska Wilderness Sailing Safaris Stan Stephens Charters the Whale Center Simpson's Marine Charters the Sierra Club Greenpeace, U.S.A. Greenpeace, Canada and South East Alaska Conservation Council, Inc., and State of Alaska, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee. v. William G. Gordon, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service John v. Byrne, Administrator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary for the United States Department of Commerce and the United States Department of Commerce, Tim Jones Nancy & James Lethcoe Wendy Simpson Alaska Wilderness Sailing Safaris Stan Stephens Charters the Whale Center Simpson's Marine Charters the Sierra Club Greenpeace, U.S.A. Greenpeace, Canada and South East Alaska Conservation Council, Inc., and State of Alaska, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee. v. William G. Gordon, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service John v. Byrne, Administrator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary for the United States Department of Commerce and the United States Department of Commerce, and Sea World, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant
See Balelo v. Baldrige, 724 F.2d 753, 756 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Counter v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC
See generally Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 644 F.2d 460, 464 (5th Cir. Unit A May 1981) (“‘[a]n en banc decision of our court may be overruled only by subsequent en banc consideration or by the United States Supreme Court” (internal quotations omitted)), aff’d as modified, 722 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S. Ct. 3537 , 82 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Allen
Gonzales, supra, 921 F.2d at 1537 ; Boldin, supra, 772 F.2d at 727 ; United States v. Black (1985) D.C.Cir., 759 F.2d 71 ; see also United States v. Grayson, (1986) 3d Cir., 795 F.2d 278, 285 , cert. denied, (1987) 479 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 927 , 93 L.Ed.2d 978 (a conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 846 does not bar a subsequent CCE prosecution) and United States v. Licavoli (1984) 6th Cir., 725 F.2d 1040, 1045 , cert. denied, (1984) 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (convietion of conspiracy to commit murder does not bar subsequent RICO prosecution; conviction for conspiracy to commit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Financial Corp. v. Warfield
See, e.g., 723 F.2d 1394 , 1402 n. 5 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984); Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 820 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alexander v. United States
See also United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984); Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 647 F.2d 42 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1092 , 102 S.Ct. 657 , 70 L.Ed.2d 630 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Big Horn River System
See also United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984); Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 647 F.2d 42 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1092 , 102 S.Ct. 657 , 70 L.Ed.2d 630 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walter Esposito
See, e.g., United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040 , 1049-50 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984); United States v. Boldin, 772 F.2d 719, 728-30 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986); United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 , 1009 n. 55 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982); United States v. Persico, 774 F.2d 30, 32 (2d Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. Partnership
If distinct statutory violations are found, the predicate acts will be considered distinct irrespective of the circumstances under which they arose.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1100 , 106 S.Ct. 880 , 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); see also United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1046 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward A. Thomas
See, e.g., United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1046-47 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984) (citing United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 758 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979)); United States v. Davis, 576 F.2d 1065, 1066-67 (3d Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 836 , 99 S.Ct. 119 , 58 L.Ed.2d 132 (1978); United States v. Forsythe, 560 F.2d 1127, 1134 (3d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Traitz
See also, United States v. Cusmano, 729 F.2d 380, 382 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984) (same facts and same result as Russo ). 64 In this case, as in Russo, the violent acts of the appellants were not perpetrated either during a strike or during an attempt to modify a collective bargaining agreement.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Traitz
See also, United States v. Cusmano, 729 F.2d 380, 382 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984) (same facts and same result as Russo).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Craig (In Re Crabtree)
See also, United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984) (testimony of government witness at state murder trial admissible at defendant’s later federal court RICO trial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David L. Klepper v. City of Milford, Kansas, and David L. Klepper v. United States of America, & Third Party and City of Milford, Kansas, Third Party
See, e.g., Proud v. United States, 723 F.2d 705 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984); Jones v. United States, 693 F.2d 1299 (9th Cir.1982); Simpson v. United States, 652 F.2d 831 (9th Cir.1981); Ewell by & through Ewell v. United States, 579 F.Supp. 1291, 1298 (D.Utah 1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe Criswell
See, e.g., United States v. Cusmano, 729 F.2d 380, 383 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grosser v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.
See also Crimpers Promotions Inc. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 724 F.2d 290 (2d Cir.1983) (applying McCready and General *1318 Contractors standing factors), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lane
v.
Arkansas Valley Publishing Co.
v.
Arkansas Valley Publishing Co.
No. 83-1528.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1) · N.D. New York (1)
Ct. App. Colo. Certiorari denied.