green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Fromer v. Boyer-Napert Partnership
This, of course, is a matter that the plaintiff must take up with the legislature; see Pellegrino v. O’Neill, 193 Conn. 670, 685 , 480 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 875 , 105 S. Ct. 236 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Krozser v. City of New Haven
Until that happens, however, the Superior Court has no jurisdiction to hear any such monetary claim. “ ‘A statute giving a right to costs in general terms will not be construed to include an award against the State, because the State is invested with the immunities from legal process, mesne and final, which at common law belonged to the King and there would be no power in the court to enforce its decree.’ [State v. Chapman, supra, 365 ]; State v. Anderson, 82 Conn. 392, 393-94 , 73 A. 751 (1909). ‘[I]t is a general principle that what courts cannot enforce they cannot decree.’ State …
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Heintz
State v. Chapman, supra. “A statute giving a right to costs in general terms will not be construed to include an award against the State, because the State is invested with the immunities from legal process, mesne and final, which at common law belonged to the King and there would be no power in the court to enforce its decree.” Id.; State v. Anderson, 82 Conn. 392, 393-94 , 73 A. 751 (1909). “[I]t is a general principle that what courts cannot enforce they cannot decree.” State v. Anderson, supra, 393 ; see Pellegrino v. O’Neill, 193 Conn. 670, 683 , 480 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 469…
cited
Cited "see"
Melia v. Hartford Fire Insurance
I, § 10; see Pellegrino v. O’Neill, 193 Conn. 670, 685 , 480 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 875 , 105 S. Ct. 236 , 83 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ferneding
v.
Consolidated Rail Corporation
v.
Consolidated Rail Corporation
No. 84-293.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1984.
Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.