green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
11.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"[O]nce the plaintiff establishes that his discharge resulted from constitutionally impermissible motives, he is presumed to be entitled to reinstatement."
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 47 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kimball
it is clear that a witness who is unavailable because he has invoked the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination is unavailable under the terms of 804(a)(1)
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carol Conklin v. Leo E. Lovely Joe W. Wakeley and John Huss
(2×)
ojnce the plaintiff establishes that his discharge resulted from constitutionally impermissible motives, he is presumed to be entitled to reinstatement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Drs. Steuer & Latham, P.A. v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc.
some concerted effort at a single market level - a horizontal combination or agreement - is requisite before the type of per se violation commonly termed a 'group boycott' can be found to exist
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hannahs v. New York State Teachers' Retirement System
spirt ii
discussed
Cited "see"
Theresa L. Sheppard v. Riverview Nursing Center, Incorporated, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae
(2×)
See ante at 1335 ("When Congress uses explicit language in one part of the same statute ... and then uses different language in another part of the same statute, a strong inference arises that the two provisions do not mean the same thing.") (quoting Persinger v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 729 F.2d 835, 843 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984)).
cited
Cited "see"
Great Western Directories, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
See Professional Ass’n of College Educators v. El Paso County Community College Dist., 730 F.2d 258, 274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
G & W, INC. v. East Rutherford Bor.
See Fine v. Barry and Enright Productions, 731 F. 2d 1394, 1397 (9th *514 Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 186 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carparts v. Automotive
See Spirt v. Teachers Ins. & ___ _____ _______________ Annuity Ass'n, 691 F.2d 1054 , 1063 (2d Cir. 1982), vacated and ______________ ___________ rem'd on other grounds, 463 U.S. 1223 (1983), reinstated and ________________________ ______________ modified on other grounds, 735 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1984), cert. ___________________________ _____ denied, 469 U.S. 881 (1984) (interpreting the term "employer" ______ under Title VII) ("term 'employer,' . . . is sufficiently broad to encompass any party who significantly affects access of any individual to employment opportunities, regardless of whether …
discussed
Cited "see"
Carparts Distribution Center, Inc. v. Automotive Wholesaler's Association of New England, Inc.
See Spirt v. Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass’n, 691 F.2d 1064, 1068 (2d Cir.1982), vacated and rent'd on other grounds, 468 U.S. 1223 , 103 S.Ct. 3565 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1406 (1983), reinstated and modified on other grounds, 735 F.2d 23 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984) (interpreting the term “employer” under Title VII) (“term ‘employer,’ ... is sufficiently broad to encompass any party who significantly affects access of any individual to employment opportunities, regardless of whether that party may technically be described as an ‘employer�…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 691 (5th Cir.) ("This concern is not present in this case because it was the party offering the testimony, the appellant, who had not had the opportunity to cross-examine."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); United States v. Vigoa, 656 F.Supp. at 1505 ("By conditioning admission upon proof that the party against whose interest the testimony is offered was adequately represented during the development of the testimony, Rule 804(b)(1) incorporates considerations of adversarial fairness into the evidentiary a…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 691 (5th Cir.) (“This concern is not present in this case because it was the party offering the testimony, the appellant, who had not had the opportunity to cross-examine.”), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); United States v. Vigoa, 656 F.Supp. at 1505 (“By conditioning admission upon proof that the party against whose interest the testimony is offered was adequately represented during the development of the testimony, Rule 804(b)(1) incorporates considerations of adversarial fairness into the eviden…
cited
Cited "see"
Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Needler (In re Grantham Bros.)
See Lindsey v. Ipock, 732 F.2d 619, 622 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); Matter of Garfinkle, 672 F.2d 1340, 1348 (11th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grantham Brothers
See Lindsey v. Ipock, 732 F.2d 619, 622 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); Matter of Garfinkle, 672 F.2d 1340, 1348 (11th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Dawn Mcmillan v. State Mutual Life Assurance Company Of America
See Fine v. Barry and Enright Productions, 731 F.2d 1394, 1397 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
McMillan v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America
See Fine v. Barry and Enright Productions, 731 F.2d 1394, 1397 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Noriega
See United States v. Kostadinov, 734 F.2d 905, 912 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); United States v. Arizti, 229 F.Supp. at 54-55 ; United States v. Coplon, 88 F.Supp. at 920 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Von Dardel v. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
See Persinger v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 729 F.2d 835, 842 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); Asociacion de Reclamantes v. United Mexican States, 735 F.2d 1517, 1524 (D.C.Cir. 1984) (Scalia, J.), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1051 , 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985). 12 Reclamantes also states that the entirety of the tort must take place within the United States.
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical Corporation
(2×)
See Persinger v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 729 F.2d 835 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F.2d 906 (10th Cir.1974); Canadian Indemnity Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co., 222 F.2d 601 (9th Cir.1955).
cited
Cited "see"
Belk v. United States
See Persinger v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 729 F.2d 835 , 837 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Belk v. United States
See Persinger v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 729 F.2d 835 , 837 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. New York, Department of Civil Service
See, Spirt v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass’n, 691 F.2d 1054 (2d Cir.1982) {Spirt II), vacated and remanded, 463 U.S. 1223 , 103 S.Ct. 3566 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1406 (1983), decision on remand, 735 F.2d 23 (2d Cir.1984) {Spirt II), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dr. Donald J. Barry and Dr. Bert Hassler v. Blue Cross of California
See Fine v. Barry and Enright Productions, 731 F.2d 1394, 1398 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); cf. Dahl, Inc. v. Roy Cooper Co., 448 F.2d 17, 19-20 (9th Cir.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
People of State of NY v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
See Spirt v. Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass’n, 691 F.2d 1054 , 1059 n. 4 (2d Cir.1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 463 U.S. 1223 , 103 S.Ct. 3565 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1406 (1983), modified 735 F.2d 23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, A Div. of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211, 1219 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cain
See, e.g., Ex parte Crow Dog, 109 U.S. 556, 568 , 3 S.Ct. 396 , 27 L.Ed. 1030 (1883) (holding federal government could not prosecute an American Indian who, on Indian territory, had murdered another member of his tribe, as federal statute excluded such crime from federal criminal jurisdiction in favor of allowing the Indians to engage in self-government, i.e., “the regulation by themselves of their own domestic affairs, the maintenance of order and peace among their own members by the administration of their own laws and customs”); See also United States v. Kostadinov, 734 F.2d 905, 913 (2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hsu ex rel. Chin-Ching Hsu v. Roslyn Union Free School District No. 3
See also Professional Ass’n of College Educators v. El Paso County Community College Dist., 730 F.2d 258, 273 (5th Cir.) (examining the record after district court issued injunctive ruling without making "express findings of fact"), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roslyn Union Free School District No. 3 v. Hsu
See also Professional Ass'n of College Educators v. El Paso County Community College Dist., 730 F.2d 258, 273 (5th Cir.) (examining the record after district court issued injunctive ruling without making "express findings of fact"), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryan v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 690 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. All Star Industries, Midco Pipe & Tube Co., Richard A. Brazzale, Mannesmann International Alloys, Inc. (Mia)
See also United States v. Young Brothers, Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 687 (5th Cir.) ("In order to prove that appellant actually intended to enter into the bidrigging conspiracy, the government was required to show that appellant knowingly joined or participated in the conspiracy.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); United States v. Brown, 936 F.2d 1042, 1045-46 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that district court did not err in “holding that it was unnecessary to instruct the jury that intent to produce anticompetitive effects is an element of the offense of which [defen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. All Star Industries
See also United States v. Young Brothers, Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 687 (5th Cir.) ("In order to prove that appellant actually intended to enter into the bidrigging conspiracy, the government was required to show that appellant knowingly joined or participated in the conspiracy."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S. Ct. 246 (1984); United States v. Brown, 936 F.2d 1042, 1045-46 (9th Cir. 1991) (holding that district court did not err in "holding that it was unnecessary to instruct the jury that intent to produce anticompetitive effects is an element of the offense of which [defendants] were convict…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. LBS Bank-New York, Inc.
See e.g., United States v. Young Brothers, Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 688 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); United States v. American Stevedores, Inc., 310 F.2d 47, 48-49 (2nd Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 969 , 83 S.Ct. 552 , 9 L.Ed.2d 539 . (1963); Magnolia Motor & Logging Co. v United States, 264 F.2d 950, 953 (9th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 815 , 80 S.Ct. 54 , 4 L.Ed.2d 61 (1959); United States v. General Motors, 121 F.2d 376, 411 (7th Cir.1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 618 , 62 S.Ct. 105 , 86 L.Ed. 497 (1941) ("In other words, we believ…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Morris J. Miller, United States of America v. Arnold L. Ross
See, e.g., United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 690 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 661 F.2d 1145, 1158 (7th Cir.1981), aff'd on other grounds, sub. nom Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248 , 103 S.Ct. 608 , 74 L.Ed.2d 430 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bubis v. Blanton
See also Fine v. Barry & Enright Prod., 731 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.) (student who applied to appear on six game shows and who appeared on three game shows had standing to bring antitrust suit), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc., 570 F.2d 982, 987 (D.C.Cir.1977) (a manifestation of intention to enter business and a demonstrated preparedness to do so is sufficient to establish standing), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 956 , 98 S.Ct. 3069 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1121 (1978). 14 Appellees admit that the Huron Valley standards are appropriate for determining t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bubis v. Blanton
See also Fine v. Barry & Enright Prod., 731 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.) (student who applied to appear on six game shows and who appeared on three game shows had standing to bring antitrust suit), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc., 570 F.2d 982, 987 (D.C.Cir.1977) (a manifestation of intention to enter business and a demonstrated preparedness to do so is sufficient to establish standing), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 956 , 98 S.Ct. 3069 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1121 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cynthia Morgan v. Safeway Stores, Inc., and Safeway Arizona Federal Credit Union
(2×)
EEOC v. Colby College, 589 F.2d at 1141 ; see also Spirt v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association, 475 F.Supp. 1298 , 1308 n. 16 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (same), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 691 F.2d 1054 (2d Cir.1982), cert. granted and judgment vacated, 463 U.S. 1223 , 103 S.Ct. 3565 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1406 (1983), on remand, judgment reinstated with modification on other ground, 735 F.2d 23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark B. Harmon v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United States
(2×)
See also Professional Ass’n of College Educators v. El Paso County Community College District, 730 F.2d 258, 273-74 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); Zepeda v. United States I.N.S., 753 F.2d 719 , 728 n. 1 (9th Cir.1983); id. at 733-34 (dissenting opinion); Gregory v. Litton Sys., Inc., 472 F.2d 631, 633-34 (9th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Herbert Linn, A/K/A Dennis Kenneth Long
See United States v. Miller, 771 F.2d 1219, 1237 (9th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 694 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stellmaker v. DePetrillo
See Gavrilles v. O’Connor, 579 F.Supp. 301 (D.Mass.1984) (“Gavrilles I”); see also Professional Ass’n of College Educators v. El Paso County Community College, 730 F.2d 258 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (recognizing protection for filing grievances); cf. McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479, 484-85 , 105 S.Ct. 2787 , 86 L.Ed.2d 384 (1985) (petition to government entitled to only qualified immunity from libel suit; noting standard identical to that for other first amendment expression).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mason
See e.g., United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 693 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); United States v. Kegler, 724 F.2d 190, 194 (D.C.Cir.1983); United States v. Janoe, 720 F.2d 1156, 1160 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dale Irving Mason, United States of America v. Dennis John Napieralski, United States of America v. John H. Borton, United States of America v. Nancy Lee Mason
See e.g., United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 693 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); United States v. Kegler, 724 F.2d 190, 194 (D.C.Cir.1983); United States v. Janoe, 720 F.2d 1156, 1160 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Herbert Linn, A/K/A Dennis Kenneth Long
See United States v. Miller, 771 F.2d 1219, 1237 (9th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 694 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. *742 246, 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dynalectric Company Paxson Electric Company G.W. Walther Ewalt Wesley C. Paxson, Sr.
See also United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 689 (5th Cir.) (to withstand sufficiency challenge to mail fraud convictions, “the government was required to show that the mailings (relating to the billing and payment of the $10,001) were ‘in furtherance’ of the bidrigging scheme.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 246 , 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984). 22 4.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
English v. Thorne
News 6619 (tortious act or omission must occur within the jurisdiction of the United States); see also Persinger v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 729 F.2d 835 (D.C.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984) (necessary that both tort and injury occur in United States to avoid defense of sovereign immunity).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rutman Wine Company v. E. & J. Gallo Winery
See also Fine v. Barry and Enright Productions, 731 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); Cascade Cabinet Co. v. Western Cabinet and Millwork, 710 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines
Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd., 416 F.2d 71, 85 (9th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1062 , 90 S.Ct. 752 , 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1970); see also Fine v. Barry and Enright Productions, 731 F.2d 1394, 1398-99 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (consciously parallel behavior alone not sufficient to establish conspiracy). 25 We next consider Foothills' allegation that the Union coerced the separate defendants to boycott Foothills, a boycott Foothills claims is per se unlawful.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines
Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd., 416 F.2d 71, 85 (9th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1062 , 90 S.Ct. 752 , 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1970); see also Fine v. Barry and Enright Productions, 731 F.2d 1394, 1398-99 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (consciously parallel behavior alone not sufficient to establish conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Elegant Concepts, Ltd.
See, e.g., In re Cox Cotton Co., 24 B.R. 930 (E.D.Ark.1982), rev’d on other grounds, sub nom., Lindsey v. Ipoch, 732 F.2d 619 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom., Cryts v. French, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 247 , 83 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); In re Continental Airlines, 61 B.R. 758 (S.D.Texas 1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thurman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6934.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1984.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.