green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People ex rel. S.J.C.
See Thompson v. Arkansas Social Seros., 282 Ark. 369 , 669 S.W.2d 878 (phrases “mental illness” and “emotional illness” not void for vagueness in statute terminating parent-child relationship of parent who suffers from “[l]ongstanding and uncontrollable mental or emotional illness or mental deficiency”), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 926 , 105 S.Ct. 316 , 83 L.Ed.2d 254 (1984); see also State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
People in Interest of SJC
See Thompson v. Arkansas Social Servs., 282 Ark. 369 , 669 S.W.2d 878 (phrases "mental illness" and "emotional illness" not void for vagueness in statute terminating parent-child relationship of parent who suffers from "[l]ongstanding and uncontrollable mental or emotional illness or mental deficiency"), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 926 , 105 S.Ct. 316 , 83 L.Ed.2d 254 (1984); see also State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tax Analysts v. United States Department of Justice
See Getman v. NLRB, 450 F.2d at 681 (MacKinnon, J., concurring) ("If this situation is to be corrected, it will require an amendment to the Act.”). 17 .See Brief for Respondent United States at 13, 15, filed in Crooker v. U.S. Parole Comm’n., 469 U.S. 926 , 105 S.Ct. 317 , 83 L.Ed.2d 255 (1984) (Solicitor General conceding that presentence reports will no longer be claimed not to be "agency records”); Lykins v. Department of Justice, 725 F.2d 1455, 1458 (D.C.Cir.1984); Carson v. Department of Justice, 631 F.2d 1008, 1010 (D.C.Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Migdalia M.
See Thompson v. Arkansas Social Services, 669 S.W.2d 878 (Ark. 1984), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 926 , 105 S. Ct. 316 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Block & Leviton LLP v. Federal Trade Commission
Cir. 1980), abrogated on other grounds, U.S. Dep’t of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595, 598 (1982) (restricting the application of FOIA Exemption 4 “to data which have not been generated within the Government”); see also Crooker v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 730 F.2d 1, 9 (1st Cir.), cert. granted, vacated on other grounds, 469 U.S. 926 (1984) (stating “information obtained from inside the government not exempt” under Exemption 4 (citation omitted)); cf. Madison Cty., N.Y. v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 641 F.2d 1036, 1040 (1st Cir. 1981)(declining to create an exemption for governme…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Mazda, Inc.
v.
Edgar, Secretary of State of Illinois
v.
Edgar, Secretary of State of Illinois
No. 84-342.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ill. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.