Lisk v. United States, 470 U.S. 1055 (1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Lisk v. United States, 470 U.S. 1055 (1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Noble Lee Simpson v. Carlos Ortiz, Warden Fci, Bastrop, U.S. Parole Comm. (ca5, 1993-07-16) · Strongest negative: Foster v. United States (dc, 1988-10-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Foster v. United States (2×)
D.C. · 1988 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Wilkinson, 754 F.2d 1427, 1435 (2d Cir.1985) (“A defendant’s Bruton rights would be violated, however, only if the statement, standing alone, would clearly inculpate him without introduction of further independent evidence.). 5 The Fifth Circuit, in Clark v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 471 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1055 , 105 S.Ct. 1761 , 84 L.Ed.2d 823 (1985), appears to have adopted contextual analysis, at least where the redacted statement makes clear that the confessing codefendant had named names which had been redacted.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Noble Lee Simpson v. Carlos Ortiz, Warden Fci, Bastrop, U.S. Parole Comm.
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, we have expressly stated that, “[bjefore we will issue [a writ of habeas corpus], the petitioner must demonstrate that he has suffered some prejudice as a result of the alleged constitutional violation....” Bro wn v. Collins, 937 F.2d 175, 182 (5th Cir.1991); see also Clark v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 471, 475-76 (5th Cir.1984) (“[W]e do not grant a writ of habeas corpus in every instance in which the state has failed to conform to constitutional requirements.”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1055 , 105 S.Ct. 1761 , 84 L.Ed.2d 823 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Hien Hai Hoac, United States of America v. Hgai Choy Chan
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 1134, 1142 (11th Cir.1988) (Bruton violation where use of pronoun “they” in redactéd confession clearly implicated codefendants) and Clark v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 471, 477 (5th Cir.1984) (Bruton violation where redacted confession referred to “the three of us” and police witnesses testified that confessor had provided police with specific names of his accomplices), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1055 , 105 S.Ct. 1761 , 84 L.Ed.2d 823 (1985) with United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 652-53 (2nd Cir.1989) (no Bruton violation where reference to “anot…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Leonardo Diaz Garcia
8th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Clark *391 v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 471, 476-79 (5th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1055 , 105 S.Ct. 1761 , 84 L.Ed.2d 823 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lisk
v.
United States
No. 84-5607.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1985.
470 U.S. 1055
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.