Catlett Et Al. v. United States, 471 U.S. 1074 (1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Catlett Et Al. v. United States, 471 U.S. 1074 (1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
82 citation events across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ethyl Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Ferroalloys Association, Intervenors (cadc, 1995-04-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ethyl Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Ferroalloys Association, Intervenors
D.C. Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1571 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985) (noting "[t]he EPA’s rule also furthers the purpose of the Congress”).
discussed Cited "see" Charter Township of Huron v. Richards
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Friedrich v. Secretary of HHS, 894 F.2d 829, 834 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 59 , 112 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990), General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" Charter Township Of Huron v. Richards
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Friedrich v. Secretary of HHS, 894 F.2d 829, 834 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 59 , 112 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990), General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, Inc. v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
D.C. Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (1984) (en banc) (rule is interpretative in part because “EPA’s entire justification for the rule is comprised of reasoned statutory interpretation, with reference to the language, purpose and legislative history of section 207(c)”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985); United Technologies, 821 F.2d at 718-19.
discussed Cited "see" Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp.
D.D.C. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Motors Corp. v. Ruckleshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C.Cir. 1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985); American Postal Workers v. United States Postal Service, 707 F.2d 548 (D.C.Cir.1983), cer t. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1594 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Comite De Apoyo Para Los Trabajadores Agricolas v. Dole
D.D.C. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561 (D.C.Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985); Batterton v. Marshall, 648 F.2d 694 (D.C.Cir.1980).
cited Cited "see" Anderson Shipping Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, and United States of America
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 73 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 269, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,523, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1112, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1713 W.L. Hodge v. John Dalton, Officially as Secretary of the Navy
9th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565-66 (D.C.Cir.1984) (interpretative rules do not need notice and comment), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hodge v. Dalton
9th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565-66 (D.C.Cir.1984) (interpretative rules do not need notice and comment), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Orengo Caraballo v. Reich
D.C. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., General [ 304 U.S.App.D.C. 151 ] Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C.Cir.1984) (distinction " 'enshrouded in considerable smog' " (quoting Noel v. Chapman, 508 F.2d 1023, 1030 (2d Cir.1975))), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Orengo Caraballo v. Reich
D.C. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C.Cir.1984) (distinction “ ‘enshrouded in considerable smog”’ (quoting Noel v. Chapman, 508 F.2d 1023, 1030 (2d Cir.1975))), cer t. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dia Navigation Co., Ltd. v. Reno
D.N.J. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
First, the Court indicated a court must determine whether Congress “has directly spoken to the precise question at issue.” Id., at 842, 104 S.Ct. at 2781 ; see also General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1567 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied sub nom., General Motors Corp. v. Thomas, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of United States, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
N.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
If, based upon the results of this “in use” testing, the administrator of the EPA determines that a class of vehicles does not conform to the vehicle emission standards he or she may order a recall of such vehicles at the manufacturer’s expense. 42 U.S.C. § 7541 (c); see also General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561 , 21 ERC 1529 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. v. Sullivan
D. Ariz. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 , 65 S.Ct. 161 , 164 89 L.Ed. 124 (1944). 432 U.S. at 425 n. 9, 97 S.Ct. at 2405 -06 n. 9; see also General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 724 F.2d 979 , 984-85 n. 30 (D.C.Cir.1983) (“A court always has the power to substitute its judgment for that of the agency in the case of an interpretative rule, even though courts customarily accord some measure of deference to an agency’s interpretation of a statute for which it has been assigned the responsibility of enforcement.”), aff'd in part on rehearing, 742 F.2d 1561 (1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 10…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Catlett, 747 F.2d 1102 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985); United States v. Brandt, 717 F.2d 955 (6th Cir.1983); United States v. FMC Corp., 572 F.2d 902 (2d Cir.1978); United States v. Green, 571 F.2d 1 (6th Cir.1977); United States v. Ireland, 493 F.2d 1208 (4th Cir.1973); United States v. Wood, 437 F.2d 91 (9th Cir.1971); Rogers v. United States, 367 F.2d 998 (8th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 943 , 87 S.Ct. 976 , 17 L.Ed.2d 874 (1967); United States v. Bryson, 414 F.Supp. 1068 (D.Del.1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Engler
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Catlett, 747 F.2d 1102 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985); United States v. Brandt, 717 F.2d 955 (6th Cir.1983); United States v. FMC Corp., 572 F.2d 902 (2d Cir.1978); United States v. Green, 571 F.2d 1 (6th Cir.1977); United States v. Ireland, 493 F.2d 1208 (4th Cir.1973); United States v. Wood, 437 F.2d 91 (9th Cir.1971); Rogers v. United States, 367 F.2d 998 (8th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 943 , 87 S.Ct. 976 , 17 L.Ed.2d 874 (1967); United States v. Bryson, 414 F.Supp. 1068 (D.Del.1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Virgil Raymond Catlett, III
v.
United States
84-1209.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1985.
471 U.S. 1074
White.
Cited by 94 opinions  |  Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice WHITE, dissenting.

Lead Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Dissent

Justice White,

dissenting.

Petitioners were convicted and fined for hunting doves in a “baited” field contrary to the Federal Migratory Bird Act, 16 U. S. C. §703, and the regulations issued thereunder, despite their claim that they were unaware of the baiting and that they could not reasonably have been aware of it, since the remaining bait on the property was hidden from view at the time of the hunt.

The Court of Appeals affirmed, observing that petitioners “were apparently unaware of, and had not participated in, the baiting of the field.” 747 F. 2d 1102, 1103 (CA6 1984). Nonetheless, the panel applied prior law of the Circuit to hold that scienter is not an element of the crime charged, and thus that petitioners could be convicted even if they could not have reasonably known that the field was baited.

The rule applied is that adopted by several Circuits, reading the regulation in question to impose strict liability on those who hunt over baited fields. See, e. g., United States v. Chandler, 753 F. 2d 360, 363 (CA4 1985); United States v. Brandt, 717 F. 2d 955, 958-959 (CA6 1983); United States v. Jarman, 491 F. 2d 764, 766-767 (CA4 1974); Rogers v. United States, 367 F. 2d 998, 1001 (CA8 1966), cert. denied, 386 U. S. 943 (1967). Nevertheless, as the Court of Appeals below recognized, the rule applied here is contrary to the holding of a case from another Federal Circuit which requires proof of at least the minimum scienter, that hunters should have known of the baited condition. United States v. Delahoussaye, 573 F. 2d 910, 912 (CA5 1978).

[*1075] There is a clear and recognized division between Circuits on the elements of a federal criminal offense. As the court explained in Delahoussaye, the regulation at issue here “is a national one, founded on a treaty, and [it] should not mean one thing in one state and another elsewhere.” Id., at 913. I would grant certiorari to resolve the split among the Courts of Appeals.