green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…furthermore, the government need not prove that the supervisor had personal contact with each person
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
U.S. v. Hinojosa
furthermore, the government need not prove that the supervisor had personal contact with each person
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jacobson v. United States
(2×)
the most important factor . . . is whether the defendant evidenced reluctance to engage in criminal activity which was overcome by repeated government inducement
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Humberto Hinojosa and Carlos Lerma
furthermore, the government need not prove that the supervisor had personal contact with each person
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Manuel Bobadilla-Lopez
in the absence of a clear expression of legislative will, we adopt the construction of the act that avoids significant constitutional questions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Ned Grubb
See United States v. Hunt, 749 F.2d 1078, 1088 (4th Cir.1984) (judgeship can be an enterprise for RICO purposes), cert. denied, Hunt v. United States, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Doris Jean Admon, A/K/A Tina Nunn, Tina Caldwell
See United States v. Becton, 751 F.2d 250, 255 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985); see also United States v. Zolicoffer, 869 F.2d 771, 774 (3d Cir.) (Travel Act violation requires some overt act in furtherance of the unlawful activity subsequent to the travel), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1113 , 109 S.Ct. 3172 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund v. Office of Thrift Supervision
See Tennessee v. Dole, 749 F.2d 331 , 336 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jehan Zeb Mir, M.D. v. Little Company of Mary Hospital
See Brunswick Corp. v. Riegel Textile Corp., 752 F.2d 261, 272 (7th Cir.1984) (defending oneself in a proceeding brought by another is not an act actionable under the federal antitrust laws), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985); cf. Pace, 813 F.2d at 238 (bringing a state court action to enforce a contract illegal under the antitrust laws is the last overt act and prosecuting the suit does not continue the violation; the statute of limitations runs from the date the suit is filed).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnnie Will Johnson v. Artim Transportation System, Inc., and Teamsters Union Local 142, Defendants
See Brunswick Corp. v. Riegel Textile Corp., 752 F.2d 261, 268 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d *549 615 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roosevelt Theodore Becton
(2×)
See United States v. Becton, 751 F.2d 250 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willie M. Aikens
Appellant fails to recognize, however, that out of court statements are only hearsay if they are “offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” Fed.R.Evid. 801(c); see, e.g., United States v. Hunt, 749 F.2d 1078, 1083-84 (4th Cir.1984) (holding that out of court statements are not hearsay if they are offered for the limited purpose of rebutting defendant’s contention that the government’s investigation was improperly motivated), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
North Carolina Electric Membership Corp. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
See id.; see also Brunswick Corp. v. Riegel Textile Corp., 578 F.Supp. 893, 898 (N.D.Ill.1983), aff'd, 752 F.2d 261 (7th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985) (using “knew or could have discovered” standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Higgins v. New York Stock Exchange
See also Brunswick Corp. v. Riegel Textile Corp., 752 F.2d 261, 270 (7th Cir.1984) (patent-interference proceeding did not toll statute as Patent Office lacked primary jurisdiction over question of patent validity), ce rt. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Jader Alvarez-Moreno, A/K/A Carlos Jader Alvarez, Said Pavon Jatter, Ricardo Pavon Jatter
(2×)
Rosenthal, 793 F.2d at 1225 -26 (quoting United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1357 (11th Cir.1984)); see also, United States v. Becton, 751 F.2d 250, 254 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James C. Wright v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Lincoln v. State, 287 Ark. 16 , 696 S.W.2d 316, 316 (1985); see also United States v. Becton, 751 F.2d 250, 256 (8th Cir.1984) (due process is satisfied if the defendant has actual notice of the charges against him), cert. denied 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Phone Programs Illinois, Inc. v. National Jockey Club, Inc.
See, e.g., Vandenplas v. Muskego, 753 F.2d 555 , 560 *884 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Swanger
Id. at 993 (footnotes omitted) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Hunt, 749 F.2d 1078 (4th Cir.1984) (“the Supreme Court has suggested that such a defense might be proper in certain circumstances, [but] it has yet to allow a due process attack on a government investigation to prevail”), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James David Freeman
United States v. Scott, 678 F.2d 606 , 612 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 972 , 103 S.Ct. 304 , 74 L.Ed.2d 285 (1982); see also United States v. Hunt, 749 F.2d 1078, 1084 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied [ 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 ], 53 U.S.L.W. 3880 (U.S. June 18, 1985) (No. 84-1481).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Doug Eagle v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc.
See also Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc., 752 F.2d 445, 449 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eagle v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc.
See also Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc., 752 F.2d 445, 449 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz
See also Car Carriers v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1109-10 (7th Cir.1984) ("[T]he complaint does not in any way set forth facts to support the conclusion that [the alleged] conspiracy had any anticompetitive effect."). 56 This, too, is why we do not find Brunswick Corp. v. Riegel Textile Corp., 752 F.2d 261 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985), dispositive.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tennessee ex rel. Cody, Attorney General
v.
Dole, Secretary of Transportation
v.
Dole, Secretary of Transportation
No. 84-1650.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1985.
Published
C. A.
6th Cir. Certiorari denied.