green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.4 score
“appellants' assertion of cruel and unusual punishment must fail because the sentences they received were all within the statutory limits.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Steven K. Hutzenlaub
appellants' assertion of cruel and unusual punishment must fail because the sentences they received were all within the statutory limits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Seda v. Conway
See United States v. Nerse *539 sian, 824 F.2d at 1322 (“[F]or purposes of effective assistance, not every possible motion need be filed, but rather, only those having a solid foundation.”) (citing United States v. Afflerbach, 754 F.2d 866, 870 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3506 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985)).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Pilkington
See United States v. Howard, 752 F.2d 220, 228-29 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3506 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985), vacated on other grounds, 770 F.2d 57 (6th Cir.1985) (holding that insurance investigators were not agents of the government for Fourth Amendment purposes because they had an independent reason to investigate the scene); State v. Smith, 40 Conn.App. 789 , 673 A.2d 1149, 1157 (1996) (finding that insurance investigators were not state agents because they acted "at the behest of insurance companies," not the government); Davis v. State, 178 Ga.App. 760 , 344 S.E…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. A. Ruiz-Castro
See U.S. v. Afflerbach, 754 F.2d 866, 869-70 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3506 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985); Floyd v. Garrison, 996 F.2d 947, 949 (8th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Compagnie De Reassurance D'Ile De France v. New England Reinsurance Corporation, Compagnie De Reassurance D'Ile De France v. New England Reinsurance Corporation
Salem Glass Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc., 343 Mass. 103, 106 , 176 N.E.2d 30, 32-33 (1961) (where a contract leaves a certain discretion or power in the hands of one party, that party is under a duty to exercise that power reasonably); accord Johnson v. Educational Testing Serv., 754 F.2d 20, 26 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Compagnie de France v. New England Corp
Salem Glass Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc., 343 Mass. 103, 106 , 176 _______________ _________________ N.E.2d 30, 32-33 (1961) (where a contract leaves a certain discretion or power in the hands of one party, that party is under a duty to exercise that power reasonably); accord ______ Johnson v. Educational Testing Serv., 754 F.2d 20, 26 (1st _______ __________________________ Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Compagnie De Reassurance D'Ile De France v. New England Reinsurance Corp.
Salem Glass Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc., 343 Mass. 103, 106 , 176 N.E.2d 30, 32-33 (1961) (where a contract leaves a certain discretion or power in the hands of one party, that party is under a duty to exercise that power reasonably); accord Johnson v. Educational Testing Serv., 754 F.2d 20, 26 (1st *77 Cir.1985), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
James Wingard v. Harold Smith, Warden Charles Holden, Corporal Ricky Holtsclaw, Co 1 B.J. Potter, Sgt. Timothy Stallard, Co 1
See Donald v. Wilson, 847 F.2d 1191, 1199 (6th Cir.1988), citing United States v. Martin, 740 F.2d 1352, 1361 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Thomas
(2×)
See United States v. Howard, 752 F.2d 220, 224 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3506 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Shirley Mello Rodriques v. Joseph Furtado
See Johnson v. Educational Testing Service, 754 F.2d 20, 25 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick J. Notch
See United States v. Terrell, 754 F.2d 1139, 1144 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3505 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Langston v. Act
See Johnson v. Educational Testing Service, 754 F.2d 20, 24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Langston ex rel. Langston v. ACT
See Johnson v. Educational Testing Service, 754 F.2d 20, 24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Denton
See United States v. Martin, 740 F.2d 1352 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3506 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arloha Mae Pinto, United States of America v. Marcel Samuel Lambert
See United States v. Terrell, 754 F.2d 1139, 1146-47 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3505 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
J. Gary Madsen v. The United States of America, Ex Rel. The United States Army, Corps of Engineers
See Lampitt v. United States, 753 F.2d 702 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3505 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985) (Navy active duty ser-vicemember on convalescent leave barred from bringing medical malpractice suit by the Feres doctrine).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cortale v. Educational Testing Service
D. v Educational Testing Serv., 87 Misc 2d 657 ; see also, Johnson v Educational Testing Serv., 754 F2d 20, cert denied 472 US 1029 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Rausch
See also, Jones v. Reagan, 748 F.2d 1331 (9th Cir.1984) (legislation is presumed to be rational), cer t. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3505 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard Taylor (92-4050) and Eugene N. Wilson (92-4058)
United States v. Horton, 847 F.2d 313, 322 (6th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Martin, 740 F.2d 1352, 1361 (6th Cir.1984) ("whether the [jury] charge, taken as a whole, fairly and adequately submits the issues and applicable law to the jury"), cert. denied. 472 U.S. 1029 (1985). 18 While it is true that a specific intent instruction was not specifically given in regard to the aiding and abetting charge, Count 1 was a conspiracy count, and conspiracy as charged included all of the conduct charged in the remaining substantive counts set forth in the indictment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carolyn Brown, Richard Brown, Dorothy Lewis Brown, Rosa Brown, Shenita Jackson Brown
“Association with a coconspirator or presence at the scene of the crime is insufficient to prove participation in a conspiracy.” Hernandez, 896 F.2d at 518 ; see also United States v. Kelly, 749 F.2d 1541, 1548-49 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3506 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985) (mere presence, without more, held insufficient to convict defendant of knowing participation in drug conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Agnes Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Riddick
See, e.g., Johnson v. Educational Testing Serv., 754 F.2d 20, 23-25 (1st Cir.1985) cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985) (because defendant’s formulation, grading and reporting of standardized test is not exclusive public function, and in light of failure to prove that public institutions belonging to testing service administering law school admission tests took lead in instigating challenged conduct, defendant testing service was not state actor); Dietz v. American Dental Ass’n., 479 F.Supp. 554, 556 (E.D.Mich.1979) (American Dental Association’s procedure…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
New Hampshire Podiatric Medical Ass'n v. New Hampshire Hospital Ass'n
See also Feldman v. Jackson Memorial Hosp., 509 F.Supp. 815 (S.D.Fla. 1981), aff'd without opinion, 752 F.2d 647 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard A. Bolt and Richard A. Bolt, M.D. v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center
Inc., 789 F.2d 278 , 281 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 972 , 107 S.Ct. 474 , 93 L.Ed.2d 418 (1986); see also Feldman v. Jackson Memorial Hosp., 571 F.Supp. 1000, 1008 (S.D.Fla.1983), aff'd, 752 F.2d 647 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985); Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 79 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willie Joseph Causey, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Martin, 757 F.2d 770, 771 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3506 , 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985) (plain errors are those which would produce a substantial miscarriage of justice to the defendant if not corrected); Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b) (plain errors affect a defendant’s “substantial rights”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Afflerbach
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-1811.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.