green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Contact Lens”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cantu v. Rocha
See Ramie v. City of Hedwig Village, 765 F.2d 490, 492-93 (5th Cir.1985) (“[a]lthough in retrospect some question may be determined to be irrelevant and not within the government’s proper sphere of concern, police officers must have the freedom at least to ask the questions they believe will aid *807 them in the investigation” and recognizing that asking otherwise proper questions in an abusive and harassing manner does not amount to invasion of privacy), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 809 , 88 L.Ed.2d 784 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kim M. Buckley and Mark R. Herman
Soria, 965 F.2d at 439 ; see United States v. Barrientos, 758 F.2d 1152, 1159 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 810 , 88 L.Ed.2d 785 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc. v. State of Mississippi v. Edwin King and John Salter, Subclass Second-Appellants
See Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 599 , 97 S.Ct. 869, 876 , 51 L.Ed.2d 64 (1977). 3 We described this privacy right in Ramey v. City of Hedwig Village, 765 F.2d 490, 492 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 809 , 88 L.Ed.2d 784 (1986): The constitution protects individuals against invasion of their privacy by the government.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gambize Schardar
See United States v. Garmany, 762 F.2d 929, 935-37 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 811 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 785 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis M. Parker Ford v. Bill Seabold, Warden, Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Accord Alexander v. Louisiana, 405 U.S. 625, 633 , 92 S.Ct. 1221, 1226 , 31 L.Ed.2d 536 (1972) (male petitioner could not challenge alleged exclusion of females from grand jury.) 9 In Aldridge v. Marshall, 765 F.2d 63 (6th Cir.1985, cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 810 , 88 L.Ed.2d 785 (1986), the Court relied on the language in Castaneda in rejecting the petitioner’s grand jury challenge because he was not a member of the alleged excluded classes: doctors, lawyers, students, the clergy, dentists, the sick, or felons.
discussed
Cited "see"
Association For Retarded Citizens Of Alabama, Inc. v. Wayne Teague
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Manecke v. School Board of Pinellas County Fla., 762 F.2d 912 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 809 , 88 L.Ed.2d 784 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ass'n for Retarded Citizens of Alabama, Inc. v. Teague
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Manecke v. School Board of Pinellas County Fla., 762 F.2d 912 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 809 , 88 L.Ed.2d 784 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Karen Irene Shores Leight
See United States v. Garmany, 762 F.2d 929, 938 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 811 , 88 L.Ed.2d 785 (1986); United States v. Georgalis, 631 F.2d 1199, 1205 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Brown
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Barrientos, 758 F.2d 1152, 1159 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 810 , 88 L.Ed.2d 785 (1986) in which the court held that exigent circumstances justified a no-knock search where the police had reason to believe the defendants were armed and dangerous and had information that the occupants of the premises had possession of cocaine which could have been destroyed or disposed of quickly had the police given warning of their presence and their purpose.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ron Leon, Jr.
However, "[a] defendant who takes the stand in his own behalf cannot then claim the privilege against cross-examination on matters reasonably related to the subject matter of his direct examination." United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1340 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 (1978); see also Aldridge v. Marshall, 765 F.2d 63, 67 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 (1986) (" '[A]fter taking the stand, the defendant cannot proceed to answer those questions which reflect favorably upon his innocence and refuse to answer those questions [concerning prior bad acts] which tend t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shirlene Hall v. Knott County Board of Education
(2×)
As the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit put it in Anderson v. Thompson, 658 F.2d 1205, 1211 (7th Cir.1981), "[n]either the statutory language nor the context in which it appears demonstrates a congressional intent to create any type of educational malpractice action." Accord, Powell v. Defore, 699 F.2d 1078, 1081 (11th Cir.1983); see also Manecke v. School Bd. of Pinellas Co., Fla., 762 F.2d 912 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 809 , 88 L.Ed.2d 784 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glanz v. Vernick
See, e.g., Manecke v. School Bd., 553 F.Supp. 787 , 788-90 (M.D.Fla.1982), rev’d on other grounds, 762 F.2d 912 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 809 , 88 L.Ed.2d 784 (1986); Carter v. Independent School Dist., 550 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Okla.1981); but see Hutchings v. Erie City & County Library Bd. of Directors, 516 F.Supp. 1265 (W.D.Pa.1981); Patton v. Dumpson, 498 F.Supp. 933 (S.D.N.Y.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilbert S. Brodie, A/K/A Dubby Brodie
See, e.g., United States v. Garmany, 762 F.2d 929, 938 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 811 , 88 L.Ed.2d 785 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goebel v. Colorado Department of Institutions
(2×)
See also Manecke v. School Bd. of Pinellas County, 553 F.Supp. 787 , 789 (M.D.Fla.1982), rev'd on other grounds, 762 F.2d 912 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 , 106 S.Ct. 809 , 88 L.Ed.2d 784 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Interest of JD
Specifically, 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (b)(2) states that such procedures shall include an impartial due process hearing whenever a complaint has been received with respect to the evaluation or educational placement of the child. [3] Rule 6A-6.03311(5) implements section 230.23(4)(m)4 and provides that the due process hearing "may be initiated by a parent or a school district on the proposal or refusal to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, or educational assignment of the student or the provision of a free appropriate public education to the student." [4] See Smith v. Robinson, 468 U.…
Carrollo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-933.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.