green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Guadalupe De Leon Acuna v. State
U.L.Q. 189 (1986) (suggests that courts should exclude evidence from prior acquitted crimes only if it is necessary to prove same ultimate fact); but see United States v. Gentile, 816 F.2d 1157 (7th Cir. 1987) (acquittal on charge of interstate commerce violation not preclusive of use of same testimony on retrial to prove charge of cocaine possession). 71 See, e.g., Flittie v. Solem, 775 F.2d 933 (8th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 (1986); United States v. Sutton, 732 F.2d 1483 (10th Cir. 1984); United States v. Van Cleave, 599 F.2d 954 (10th Cir. 1979); see also People v. Goodman, 69…
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca4 1989
But see Flittie v. Solem, 775 F.2d 933, 942 (8 Cir.1985) ("collateral estoppel does not bar relitigation of facts that are evidentiary in the second prosecution"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 , 106 S.Ct. 1223 , 89 L.Ed.2d 333 (1986) 3 Accordingly, we find it unnecessary to determine whether the acquittal of charges arising from the 1979 arrest "necessarily determined" that Ricks did not possess narcotics at that time 4 The Court went on to state: In the event that at that hearing the allegation of perjury or reckless disregard is established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence,…
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Ricks
But see Flittie v. Solem, 775 F.2d 933, 942 (8 Cir.1985) ("collateral estoppel does not bar relitigation of facts that are evidentiary in the second prosecution”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 , 106 S.Ct. 1223 , 89 L.Ed.2d 333 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arango-Chairez
See Flittie v. Solem, 775 F.2d 933, 944 (8th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 , 106 S.Ct. 1223 , 89 L.Ed.2d 333 (1986), opinion superseded by Flittie v. Solem, 867 F.2d 1053 (8th Cir.1988); see also Jenner v. Smith, 982 F.2d 329, 335 (8th Cir.) (“[w]arnings are not required simply because the questioning takes place in the station house, or because the questioned person is one whom the police suspect”) (quoting Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 495 , 97 S.Ct. 711, 714 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 81 , 126 L.Ed.2d 49 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leon Johnson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services
See Krumpelman v. Heckler, 767 F.2d 586, 588-89 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 (1986) (citing McGowen v. Harris, 666 F.2d 60 (4th Cir.1981)). 9 The ALJ's opinion reflects that the ALJ simply reviewed the 1979 applications to see if the new evidence presented by Johnson at the 1989 hearing constituted "good cause" to reopen the applications.
discussed
Cited "see"
Martha Southard v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
See Krumpelman v. Heckler, 767 F.2d 586, 588 (9th Cir. 1985) (when claimant does not assert prejudice from Secretary's failure to give notice that res judicata may bar request to reopen application, lack-of-notice claim fails), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Pearson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
See, Krumpelman v. Heckler, 767 F.2d 586 (9th Cir.1985), cert. den. 475 U.S. 1025 , 106 S.Ct. 1222 , 89 L.Ed.2d 332 (1986) (Krumpelman).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence A. Moore
See Flittie v. Solem, 775 F.2d 933, 943-44 (8th Cir.1985) (en banc) (admission of statement obtained in violation of Miranda constitutes harmless error when remaining, independent evidence overwhelmingly supports defendant’s conviction), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 , 106 S.Ct. 1223 , 89 L.Ed.2d 333 (1986); United States v. Packer, 730 F.2d 1151, 1157 (8th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Dove v. Thieret
See Flittie v. Solem, 751 F.2d 967 , 973 n. 11 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 , 106 S.Ct. 1223 , 89 L.Ed.2d 333 (1986) (In finding that there existed no government compulsion, the court discussed the fact that the informant “received no specific instructions from the government regarding the direction of the conversation” with the suspect.); United States v. Burton, 724 F.2d at 1289 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
See Lester, 81 F.3d at 827 ; see also Krumpelman v. Heckler, 2 767 F.2d 586, 588 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louise M. Riedle v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services
See id. at 1115 n. 6; see also Krumpelman v. Heckler, 767 F.2d 586, 589 (9th Cir.1985),% cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1025 (1986). 6 In connection with her first argument, Riedle also contends that even if there was not a de facto reopening of her previously adjudicated application, then the ALJ erred in not expressly reopening the application.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Willoughby, Quintin Prioleau, Arthur Prioleau, and Carleton Montgomery
See, e.g., United States v. Conley, 779 F.2d 970, 972-73 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied 479 U.S. 830 , 107 S.Ct. 114 , 93 L.Ed.2d 61 (1986), Flittie v. Solern, 751 F.2d 967, 974 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1025 , 106 S.Ct. 1223 , 89 L.Ed.2d 333 (1986); Cervantes v. Walker, 589 F.2d 424, 427 (9th Cir.1978).
Simmons
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 85-5993.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.