green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Hernandez-Rivas
dialogue between the court and the person making the plea is the best method for establishing the factual basis of a plea as well as its voluntariness.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Torres-Arboledo v. State
the most common practice employed among the majority of trial judges is to write the reasons for departure on the score sheet form provided by the sentencing guidelines committee ... in the place marked reasons for departure.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Louis Smith
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Id. at 1129. 5 The plain error doctrine requires that a plain error affecting a "substantial right" of a defendant cannot be overlooked.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Behmanshah
See United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1129 (3rd Cir.1985) (“To find plain error [under Rule] 52(b), the mistake need be so clear that ‘the trial judge and prosecutor were derelict in countenancing it, even absent the defendant’s timely assistance in detecting it.’ ”), (quoting United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 163 , 102 S.Ct. 1584 , 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Wayneti Reeder, A/K/A Wayne Reeder
See United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071, 1075 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Reeder
See United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071, 1075 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bissell
Counsel for Barbara BisseU’s passing comment regarding her belief Proposed Jury Instruction No. 100 should not be given does not meet her requirement to state “distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 30 11 ; see United States v. Rosero, 42 F.3d 166, 173 (3d Cir.1994) (“Without a clearly articulated objection, a trial judge is not appraised sufficiently of the contested issue and the need to cure a potential issue____”) (citing United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1128-29 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Spinney
See, ___ e.g., United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071 (1st Cir. ____ _____________ _________________ 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 (1986); United States v. _____ ______ _____________ Quejada-Zurique, 708 F.2d 857 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. _______________ _____ ______ 885 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Simon v. United States
See United States v. Fountain, 777 F.2d 351, 355 (7th ___ _____________ ________ Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 (1986). ____ ______ Affirmed. ________ -4-
cited
Cited "see"
Simon v. United States
See United States v. Fountain, 777 F.2d 351, 355 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 (1986). 5 Affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Homer A. Hess
See United States v. Fountain, 777 F.2d 351, 358 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 (1986); United States v. Thompson, 680 F.2d 1145, 1152 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1089 (1982) and 459 U.S. 1108 (1983)). 33 In this case, defendant failed to satisfy his burden of showing a "fair and just reason" which would require either an evidentiary hearing or permit him to withdraw his guilty pleas.
discussed
Cited "see"
Big Apple Bmw, Inc. Potamkin Bmw and Vw, Inc. Robert Potamkin Alan Potamkin, in No. 91-1339 v. Bmw of North America, Inc. And Bayerische Motoren Werks, A.G. Big Apple Bmw, Inc. Potamkin Bmw & Vw, Inc. Robert Potamkin Alan Potamkin v. Bmw of North America, Inc. And Bayerische Motoren Werks, A.G. Bmw of North America, Inc., in No. 91-1458
Id. at 254 ; see United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986). 87 Because the Potamkins have proffered evidence to show concerted action in violation of the Sherman Act, they have demonstrated the requisite conspiracy for admissibility under Rule 801(d)(2)(E).
cited
Cited "see"
Big Apple BMW, Inc. v. BMW of North America, Inc.
Id. at 254 ; see United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Alvarez
See United States v. Ofarril, 779 F.2d 791 (2d Cir. 1985), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1029 (1986) (to construe the Federal school zone statute as requiring a scienter element would distort the statutory language and frustrate Congress’ unambiguous intent to penalize the distribution of narcotics within 1,000 feet of a school).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert J. Wilkinson
See United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071, 1075 (1st Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); see also Young-Bey, 893 F.2d at 181 ; Lyman, 892 F.2d at 752-54 ; Boyd, 885 F.2d at 250 ; LaGuardia, 774 F.2d at 321 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Joseph Maravilla, United States v. Rafael Jesus Dominguez
(2×)
See Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 469 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); accord United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071, 1073 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Makres
See generally United States v. Fountain, 777 F.2d 351, 355-56 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1232 , 89 L.Ed.2d 341 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Scarfo
See United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1128 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Agnes, 753 F.2d 293, 301 (3d Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lambeth v. State
See Baker v. State , 477 So.2d 496 (Ala.Crim.App. 1985), cert denied , 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1231 , 89 L.Ed.2d 340 (1986); Gwin v. State , 425 So.2d 500 (Ala.Crim. 1982), writ quashed , 425 So.2d 510 (Ala. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferguson v. State
See generally Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703, 707 (Fla. 4th DCA) (stressing importance of clear, concisely written findings to the proper development of law by appellate courts), approved, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1232 , 89 L.Ed.2d 341 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Papile v. Hernandez
Id., 409 U.S. at 199-200 , 93 S.Ct. at 382-383 ; see United States v. Ofarril, 779 F.2d 791 (2d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1231 , 89 L.Ed.2d 340 (1986) (police officer’s identification of defendants in a holding cell rather than in a line-up not impermissi-bly suggestive per se where officer had viewed defendants for several minutes during commission of crime, her description was confirmed by the arresting officer, and her post-arrest identification occurred shortly after the crime).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Zingaro
See United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1123 (3d Cir.1985) (no constructive amendment where “variation did not broaden the bases for conviction, but instead narrowed the scope of the evidence to prove an offense included in the indictment”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Kuna, 760 F.2d 813, 817-18 (7th Cir.1985) (describing Miller as distinguishing constructive amendments that broaden possible bases for conviction from variations that narrow indictment’s charges without adding any new offenses).
cited
Cited "see"
Rowan v. State
See State v. Boynton, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1232 , 89 L.Ed.2d 341 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bain v. State
See State v. Boynton, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla.1985), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1232 , 89 L.Ed.2d 341 (1986); Deegan v. State, 503 So.2d 970 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Waring v. State, 504 So.2d 786 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hatton
See also United States v. Ofarril, 779 F.2d 791, 792 (2nd Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1231 , 89 L.Ed.2d 340 (1986); United States v. Holland, 810 F.2d 1215, 1223-24 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1057 , 107 S.Ct. 2199 , 95 L.Ed.2d 854 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Spinney
See, e.g., United States v. Guerrero-Guerre ro, 776 F.2d 1071 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Quejada-Zurique, 708 F.2d 857 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 855 , 104 S.Ct. 173 , 78 L.Ed.2d 156 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Salley
See also Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), approved, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1232 , 89 L.Ed.2d 341 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moore
(2×)
United States v. Holland, 810 F.2d at 1223-24 (emphasis added); see also United States v. Ofarril, 779 F.2d 791, 792 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1231 , 89 L.Ed.2d 340 (1986); United States v. Falu, 776 F.2d 46, 50 (2d Cir.1985); see also State v. Brown, 227 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Viscioso
See, e.g., United States v. Ofarril, 779 F.2d 791, 792 (2d Cir.1985) (Court considered reliability factors even though the stationhouse identification was not per se suggestive), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1231 , 89 L.Ed.2d 340 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. State
See also Baker v. State, 477 So.2d 496 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1231 , 89 L.Ed.2d 340 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Johnstone
“Convictions generally have been sustained as long as the proof upon which they are based corresponds to an offense that was clearly set out in the indictment.” Miller, 471 U.S. at 136 , 105 S.Ct. at 1815 (deciding whether Fifth Amendment prohibits conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 when proof at trial corresponded to fraudulent scheme narrower than that alleged in indictment); see also United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1121-23 (3d Cir.1985) (upholding conviction where evidence at trial established conspiracy narrower than that alleged in indictment), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert John Thame, Jr.
For example, the Supreme Court has suggested that “[bjy its terms, recourse may be had to [Rule 52(b) ] only on appeal from a trial infected with error so ‘plain’ that the trial judge and prosecutor were derelict in countenancing it, even absent the defendant’s timely assistance in detecting it.” United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 163 , 102 S.Ct. 1584, 1592 , 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982); see also United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1129 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sultan El-Gawli
See also United States v. Rangel, 534 F.2d 147, 149 (9th Cir.) (ruling that even if evidence as to predisposition was inadmissible, overwhelming evidence that government had not induced defendant to commit the crime sufficed to disprove entrapment defense), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 854 , 97 S.Ct. 147 , 50 L.Ed.2d 129 (1976). *148 El-Gawli’s argument for an “and” charge derives from our decision in United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. State
See also Baker v. State , 477 So.2d 496 , 502-03 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), cert. denied, Baker v. Alabama , 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1231 , 89 L.Ed.2d 340 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ofarril
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-6112.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1) · Supreme Court of Florida (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.