green
Positive treatment
0.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 710, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
See, e.g., Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers, 764 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1985) (arbitrator may find that, despite lack of express prohibition on subcontracting, other substantive provisions of contract give rise to implied restrictions) cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1131 , 106 S.Ct. 1661 , 90 L.Ed.2d 203 (1986); International Union, United Automobile, Etc. v. Webster Electric Co., 299 F.2d 195, 197 (7th Cir.1962) (subcontracting "inconsistent with the basic purpose” of contract containing a union shop provision).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward Hines Lumber Company of Oregon
v.
Lumber & Sawmill Workers Local No. 2588
v.
Lumber & Sawmill Workers Local No. 2588
No. 85-1399.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1986.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.