green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wyatt Ex Rel. Rawlins v. Sawyer
(2×)
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. Alabama State Board of Education
(2×)
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1139 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986); Pettway, 576 F.2d at 1169 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Webb v. City of Republic
See Friedman v. Board of County Commissioners, 781 F.2d 777 , 780 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986); Harris v. City of Zion, 927 F.2d 1401, 1411 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1229 , 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paquin v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
(2×)
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1120 (11th Cir.1985) (stating that an appellate decision on an issue must be followed in all subsequent trial court proceedings “unless the presentation of new evidence ... dictates a different result”), cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paquin v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'N
(2×)
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1120 (11th Cir.1985) (stating that an appellate decision on an issue must be followed in all subsequent trial court proceedings "unless the presentation of new evidence ... dictates *19 a different result"), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. FCC, 768 F. 2d *203 1434 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U. S. 1169 (1986); Century Communications Corp. v. FCC, 835 F. 2d 292 (1987), cert. denied, 486 U. S. 1032 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Julius Klausner
(4×)
See United States v. MacKenzie, 777 F.2d 811, 818 (2d Cir.1985) (indicating that the fact that one defendant had a college degree and the other defendant a degree in business administration increased the likelihood that defendants were aware of their tax duties), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
(2×)
See id. (citing Cherokee Nation v. Oklahoma, 461 F.2d 674, 677 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1039 , 93 S.Ct. 521 , 34 L.Ed.2d 489 (1972), and Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department Of Natural Resources
(2×)
See id. (citing Cherokee Nation v. Oklahoma, 461 F.2d 674, 677 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1039 , 93 S.Ct. 521 , 34 L.Ed.2d 489 (1972), and Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112 , 1119 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986)). 27 Thus, the district court, once it had this court's mandate and the record, had a reversed dismissal--and a live complaint--on its hands.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smoky Mountain Secrets, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. MacKenzie, 777 F.2d 811, 815 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986) (citing Ridgewell’s Inc. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 393 , 655 F.2d 1098, 1101 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin J. Cote Patricia S. Caldwell
(2×)
Furthermore, “[t]he opinion delivered by [the] court at the time of rendering its decree may be consulted to ascertain what was intended by its mandate.” Sanford, 160 U.S. at 256 , 16 S.Ct. at 293 ; accord Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Haas v. Internal Revenue Service
(4×)
See Southern Bank of Lauderdale County v. IRS, 770 F.2d 1001, 1009-10 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniels Cablevision, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
Accord Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. FCC, 768 F.2d 1434 , 1457 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brightwell v. United States
Co. v. United States, 848 F.2d 969, 972 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Polk, 822 F.2d 871, 874 (9th Cir.1987); see Southern Bank of Lauderdale County v. Internal Revenue Serv., 770 F.2d 1001, 1007 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Telesat Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach
(2×)
See Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. F.C.C., 768 F.2d 1434 , 1437-38 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts ex rel. Nelson v. Madigan
See Friedman v. Board of County Comm’rs of Bernalillo, 781 F.2d 777 , 779 n. 2 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts v. Madigan
See Friedman v. Board of County Comm'rs of Bernalillo, 781 F.2d 777 , 779 n. 2 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Murray v. City of Austin, Travis County, Tex.
See Friedman v. Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo County, 781 F.2d 777, 781 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, *773 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence W. Berman, Marilyn Berman, and Forex Corporation
(2×)
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986). 12 CONCLUSION In sum, we conclude that the district court was within its discretion in refusing to entertain the Bermans’ statute of limitations argument, that the court did not err in finding actual fraud in the conveyances to Forex, that the government was not collaterally estopped from asserting that the conveyances were fraudulent, and that the court correctly rejected the Bermans’ contention that notice and demand were necessary for reduction of the defici…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mendelson v. City of St. Cloud
See Friedman v. Board of County Comm’rs, 781 F.2d 777 , 781 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986); American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Birmingham, 588 F.Supp. 1337 (E.D.Mich.1984), aff'd, 791 F.2d 1561 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 939 , 107 S.Ct. 421 , 93 L.Ed.2d 371 (1986); Burette, 599 F.Supp. at 797 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Association of Maximum Service Telecasters v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. FCC, 768 F.2d 1434 (D.C.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986); see also Century Communications Corp. v. FCC, 835 F.2d 292 (D.C.Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 2014 -15, 100 L.Ed.2d 602 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Association Of Maximum Service Telecasters v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. FCC, 768 F.2d 1434 (D.C.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986); see also Century Communications Corp. v. FCC, 835 F.2d 292 (D.C.Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2014 -15, 100 L.Ed.2d 602 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Enegren v. MARATHON CTY. CLUB CONDO.
Quality Shell Homes & Supply Co. v. Roley, 186 So.2d 837, 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966); see Organized Fisherman of Fla. v. Hodel, 775 F.2d 1544 (11th Cir.1985), cert. *490 denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Shockley v. State
See Van Guilder v. State, 709 S.W.2d 178, 181 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 1170, 106 S.Ct. 2891 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Behrens v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc.
(2×)
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1139-42 (11th Cir.1985) cert. denied sub nom, Hoffman v. Sylva, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tompkins v. State
(2×)
See Van Guilder v. State, 709 S.W.2d 178 (Tex.Cr.App.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2891 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986); Schuessler v. State, 719 S.W.2d 320 (Tex.Cr.App.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Exxon Corp. v. United States
Accord e.g., Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1120 (11th Cir.1985), cert. den., — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 ; Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 108 (2d Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerome E. Heinemann and George Allen Delanoy, III
See United States v. MacKenzie, 777 F.2d 811, 818 n. 2 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thelma V.A. Gibson, Catherine H. Fahringer, F. Lee Bailey, Richard E. Gerstein, Edward A. Carhart, Paul M. Rashkind, Ronald C. Dresnick, Bonnie Rippingille, D/B/A Bailey, Gerstein, Carhart, Rashkind, Dresnick & Rippingille, P.A., Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, Crossclaim David L. Paul, Intervenor-Appellant v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver, a United States Agent and Instrumentality, Defendant-Counterplaintiff, Crossclaim Centrust Bank, a Florida State Savings Bank, Citibank, N.A., a National Association, Centrust Federal Savings Bank, a Federal Savings Bank, Thelma V.A. Gibson, Catherine H. Fahringer, F. Lee Bailey, Richard E. Gerstein, Edward A. Carhart, Paul M. Rashkind, Ronald C. Dresnick, Bonnie Rippingille, D/B/A Bailey, Gerstein, Carhart, Rashkind, Dresnick & Rippingille, P.A., Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, Crossclaim David L. Paul, Intervenor v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver, a United States Agent and Instrumentality, Defendant-Counterplaintiff, Crossclaim Centrust Bank, a Florida State Savings Bank, Citibank, N.A., a National Association, Centrust Federal Savings Bank, a Federal Savings Bank
Feldman, 20 F.3d at 1134 ; see also Organized Fishermen v. Hodel, 775 F.2d 1544 , 1549 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986) (citing Heckler v. Community Health Serv., 467 U.S. 51, 59 , 104 S.Ct. 2218, 2223 , 81 L.Ed.2d 42 (1984) (estoppel lies upon misrepresentation of fact and reasonable reliance on that misrepresentation)). 31 In applying traditional concepts of estoppel, we need only address the element of reliance to determine that estoppel is inappropriate in these circumstances because we find plaintiffs' reliance on any promise by CenTrus…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gibson v. Resolution Trust Corp.
Feldman, 20 F.3d at 1134 ; see also Organized Fishermen v. Hodel, 775 F.2d 1544 , 1549 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986) (citing Heckler v. Community Health Serv., 467 U.S. 51, 59 , 104 S.Ct. 2218, 2223 , 81 L.Ed.2d 42 (1984) (estoppel lies upon misrepresentation of fact and reasonable reliance on that misrepresentation)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harris
(2×)
In the absence of First Amendment considerations (and there are none here), “vagueness challenges must be evaluated based on the particular application of the statute and not ‘on the ground that [the statute] may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally to others in situations not before the Court.’ ” United States v. Coonan, 938 F.2d 1553, 1562 (2d Cir.1991) (quoting New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 767 , 102 S.Ct. 3348, 3359 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (1982)); see also United States v. Mac-Kenzie, 777 F.2d 811, 816 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deadwyler v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
(2×)
See also Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1144 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joki v. Board of Education of the Schuylerville Central School District
Charles, 794 F.2d 265 (holding, impermissible the prominent display of a cross on a public building); see also Friedman v. Bd. of County Comm’rs of Bernalillo, 781 F.2d 777, 782 (10th Cir.1985) (the presence of a Latin cross in a city logo violates the establishment clause), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986); cf. Kaplan v. City of Burlington, 891 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 2619 , 110 L.Ed.2d 640 (1990) (declaring unconstitutional a city display of a menorah standing alone during Chanukah).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joki v. BD. OF EDUC. OF SCHUYLERVILLE CENT. SD
Charles, 794 F.2d 265 (holding impermissible the prominent display of a cross on a public building); see also Friedman v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Bernalillo, 781 F.2d 777, 782 (10th Cir.1985) (the presence of a Latin cross in a city logo violates the establishment clause), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986); cf. Kaplan v. City of Burlington, 891 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 2619 , 110 L.Ed.2d 640 (1990) (declaring unconstitutional a city display of a menorah standing alone during Chanukah).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westmarc Communications, Inc. v. Conn. Dept. of Public Utility Control
(2×)
See also Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. F.C.C., 768 F.2d 1434 , 1450 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986) (rejecting argument that cable operators are in a position to exact monopolistic charges, and finding no meaningful distinction between cable TV and the newspaper industry with respect to First Amendment freedom from government intrusion based on economic factors).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brundidge Banking Co. v. Pike County Agricultural Stabilization & Conservation Committee
See, e.g., Organized Fishermen of Fla. v. Hodel, 775 F.2d 1544 , 1549 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brundidge Banking Company v. Pike County Agricultural Stabilization And Conservation Committee
See, e.g., Organized Fishermen of Fla. v. Hodel, 775 F.2d 1544 , 1549 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2890 , 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
(2×)
Section 957 is violated only when it is demonstrated that a person acted “knowingly and willfully.” The Supreme Court ... has recognized that a scienter requirement may mitigate a law’s vagueness, especially with respect to the adequacy of notice to the complainant that his conduct is proscribed, (footnote omitted) Village of Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., supra, 455 U.S. at 499 , 102 S.Ct. at 1193 ; See also, United States v. MacKenzie, 777 F.2d 811, 816 (2 Cir., 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986); Gorin v. United States,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Region 8 Forest Service Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock
With regard to the Environmental Act, it is clear that Plaintiffs’ environmental, informational, and participational interests fail to satisfy the prudential standing requirements imposed by the courts. “[A] right to specific information under [the Environmental Act] has so far been recognized for standing purposes only when the information sought relates to environmental interests that [the Environmental Act] was intended to protect____ [The Environmental Act’s] concern is to inform other governmental agencies and the public about the environmental consequences of its proposed activitie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union
(2×)
See also Friedman v. Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo County, 781 F. 2d 777, 780-782 (CA10 1985) (en banc) (county seal including Latin cross and Spanish motto translated as "With This We Conquer," conveys a message of endorsement of Christianity), cert. denied, 476 U. S. 1169 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1142-43 (11th Cir.1985) (injunction vacated in prior appeal), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986); Coyne-Delaney Co. v. Capital Dev.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Division No. 1, Detroit, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1142-43 (11th Cir.1985) (injunction vacated in prior appeal), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986); Coyne-Delaney Co. v. Capital Dev.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Baer
See also United States v. MacKenzie, 777 F.2d 811 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Radio-Television News Directors Association v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e.g., Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. FCC, 768 F.2d 1434 , 1445-47 & n. 29 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986); WWHT, Inc. v. FCC, 656 F.2d 807 , 814-16 (D.C.Cir.1981); Geller v. FCC, 610 F.2d 973 (D.C.Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Radio-Television News Directors Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e.g., Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. FCC, 768 F.2d 1434 , 1445-47 & n. 29 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 977 (1986); WWHT, Inc. v. FCC, 656 F.2d 807 , 814-16 (D.C.Cir.1981); Geller v. FCC, 610 F.2d 973 (D.C.Cir.1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hoffman
v.
Sylva
v.
Sylva
No. 85-239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1986.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.