green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1990 ·
…error on the face of evidence does not encompass a disputed issue of fact since, almost as a matter of definition, when facts are in dispute no single answer is evident.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Willow v. Sullivan
(2×)
error on the face of evidence does not encompass a disputed issue of fact since, almost as a matter of definition, when facts are in dispute no single answer is evident.
cited
Cited "see"
Lipscomb v. State of Rhode Island
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 140 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 (1986) (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 835 n.46 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hootstein v. Town of Shutesbury
See Eagle Eye Fishing Corp. v. U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, 20 F.3d 503, 506 (1st Cir. 1994) (stating that the right of self- representation is not a license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law) (quoting Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 140 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 (1986)). 4 Of note, in Wheatleigh, this court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the case based on alleged fraud on the court, ruling that the plaintiff’s admitted misstatements were not “lies that could themselves ‘generate an unfair resolution of the case,…
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Constantino
See Castaldi v. United States, 783 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mather
(2×)
See Castaldi v. United States, 783 F.2d 119 (8th Cir. 1986), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S. Ct. 2897 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kent v. SunAmerica Life Insurance
(2×)
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 130 (1st Cir.1985), cert, denied 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John E. McGee
(2×)
See United States v. Ferri, 778 F.2d 985 , 990 n. 3 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986); O’Donnell v. Georgia Osteopathic Hosp., Inc., 748 F.2d 1543 , 1547 n. 6 (11th Cir.1984), overruled on other grounds by Lindsey v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., 810 F.2d 1094 (11th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez Flores v. Apfel
(2×)
See Robinson v. Heckler, 783 F.2d 1144, 1146 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 982 (1986); Kasey v. Sullivan, 3 F.3d 75, 79 (4th Cir.1993); and Coates v. Bowen, 875 F.2d 97, 101 (7th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guckenberger v. Boston University
(2×)
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 131 (1st Cir.1985) (holding that the judge’s restriction of the class was not an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Mitre Corp.
(2×)
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 139 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Caroline C. v. Johnson
(2×)
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
M.L.L. v. Wessman
(2×)
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 137 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986); O’Reilly v. New York Times Co., 692 F.2d 863, 867 (2d Cir.1982); In re Las Colinas Dev.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Adoption of JSPL
(2×)
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 137 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986); O'Reilly v. New York Times Co., 692 F.2d 863, 867 (2d Cir.1982); In re Las Colinas Dev.
cited
Cited "see"
Wade-Greaux Ex Rel. Greaux v. Whitehall Laboratories, Inc.
See DeLuca, 911 F.2d at 957 (citing United States v. Ferri, 778 F.2d 985, 989-91 (3d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 (1986)). *259 7.
cited
Cited "see"
McCormick v. Labor Relations Commission
Accord Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 140 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 (1986). 12 The challenge to the validity of the agency fees, however, was timely filed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Lee Williams
See Castaldi v. United States, *79 783 F.2d 119, 123 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2897 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986) (sentence within statutory limit is generally not subject to review unless the district court manifestly or grossly abused its discretion). 3 The judgment of the district court is affirmed. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Skelton
(2×)
See United States v. Ferri, 778 F.2d 985, 993 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 , 479 U.S. 831 , 107 S.Ct. 117 , 93 L.Ed.2d 63 (1986). 21 Ultimately it decided that a new trial was required for several reasons: 22 First, the allegations and evidence of possible juror bias are troubling.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Skelton
(2×)
See United States v. Ferri, 778 F.2d 985, 993 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 , 479 U.S. 831 , 107 S.Ct. 117 , 93 L.Ed.2d 63 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tolan v. Computervision Corp.
(2×)
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Gaynell McCuin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
See Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 130 (1st Cir.1985), cert. den., _ U.S. _, 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Violette v. P.A. Days, Inc.
(4×)
Numerosity Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(1) requires plaintiffs to show first that “the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable____” There is no bright line numerical test by which the district court can determine when the numerosity requirement is satisfied, and the Sixth Circuit has noted that a class does not require any specific number of members: “Impracticability of joinder is not determined according to a strict numerical test but upon the circumstances surrounding the case.” Senter, 532 F.2d at 523 n. 24; see also Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 131…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leon King v. Shirley S. Chater
See also Robinson v. Heckler, 783 F.2d 1144 , 1146 & n.3 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leon KING, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Appellee
(2×)
See also Robinson v. Heckler, 783 F.2d 1144 , 1146 & n. 3 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 982 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCree v. Sam's Club
(2×)
See also Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 131-32 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arik Ben Bachsian, A/K/A Eric Bustamante
(2×)
Generally, for evidence to be admissible under Rule 803(24), notice of reliance upon the rule must be given “sufficiently in advance of the trial ... to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet [the evidence].” Fed.R.Evid. 803(24); see also United States v. Brown, 770 F.2d 768, 771 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 , 106 S.Ct. 603 , 88 L.Ed.2d 581 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1067 , 106 S.Ct. 822 , 88 L.Ed.2d 795 (1985), and cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boggs v. Divested Atomic Corp.
(2×)
There is no bright line numerical test by which the district court can determine when the numerosity requirement is satisfied, and the Sixth Circuit has noted that a class does not require any specific number of members: “Impracticability of joinder is not determined according to a strict numerical test but upon the circumstances surrounding the case.” Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.1976); see also Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 131 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Belber v. Charles S. Lipson, M.D., D/B/A Metromedic Walk in Medical Center, Appeal of W. Robert Felix, Jr., M.D.
(2×)
See, e.g., Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 140 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986) (quoting Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 835 n. 46, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 2541 n. 46, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975)) (“It is impossible for an appellate court to review a non-existent district court ruling.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vincent v. Musone
(2×)
We have recognized that mere delay is an insufficient ground for denial of an amendment, Inleasing Corp. v. Jessup, 475 A.2d 989, 992 (R.I.1984); however, “undue and excessive delay that causes prejudice to the opposing party is grounds for denial.” Faerber, 568 A.2d at 329 (citing 3 Moore’s Federal Practice II 15.08(4)); see also Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 139 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986); Carter v. Supermarkets General Corp., 684 F.2d 187, 192 (1st Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gould v. Sullivan
(2×)
There is no bright line numerical test by which the district court can determine when the numerosity requirement is satisfied, and the Sixth Circuit has noted that a class does not require any specific number of members: “Impracticability of joinder is not determined according to a strict numerical test but upon the circumstances surrounding the case.” Senter, 532 F.2d at 523 n. 24; see also Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 131 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1172 , 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert L. Glidden v. Chromalloy American Corporation and Allied Products Corporation
Rule 23(a)(1); see also Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp., 780 F.2d 124, 130-31 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2896 , 90 L.Ed.2d 983 (1986) (49 is not so numerous that class must be certified).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
RLW-1) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO EDWARD BATTLE
Accord United States v. LeMon, 622 F.2d 1022, 1024 (10th Cir. 1980); see also Castaldi v. United States, 783 F.2d 119, 121-23 (8th Cir.) (each denomination of postage stamp counterfeited was separate violation of statute that made it 13 crime to counterfeit "any postage stamp"), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1172 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Andrews
v.
Bechtel Corp.
v.
Bechtel Corp.
No. 85-6540.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1986.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.