Mulligan v. Hazard Et Al., 476 U.S. 1174 (1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Mulligan v. Hazard Et Al., 476 U.S. 1174 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
102 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 35 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rainey v. Town of Warren (rid, 2000-01-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rainey v. Town of Warren
D.R.I. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Howard v. International Molders & Allied Workers Union, 779 F.2d 1546, 1548 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986) (international liable where its representative “worked closely” with local negotiators, resulting in discriminatory bargaining agreement); in accord, Sagers v. Yellow Freight Sys., 529 F.2d 721, 737-38 (5th Cir.1976); see also Kaplan v. International Alliance of Theatrical & Stage Employees, 525 F.2d 1354 , 1360 (9th Cir.1975) (international liable where it negotiated and signed discriminatory collective bargaining agreement).
cited Cited "see" State v. Bostic
Tenn. Crim. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Burke, 784 F.2d 1090, 1092 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2901 , 90 L.Ed.2d 987 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Shropshire
Tenn. Crim. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cruz, 783 F.2d 1470, 1473 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 987 ; United States v. Busby, 780 F.2d 804 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. McLemon, 746 F.2d 1098, 1109 (6th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Vogan (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
cma · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jackson, 781 F.2d 1114 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2901 , 90 L.Ed.2d 987 (1986); United States v. Mills, 641 F.2d 785 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 902 , 102 S.Ct. 409 , 70 L.Ed.2d 221 (1981).
cited Cited "see" United States v. McMonagle
usarmymilrev · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Littlehales, 19 M.J. 512, 516 (A.F.C.M.R. 1984), aff'd, 22 M.J. 17 (C.M.A.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2901 , 90 L.Ed.2d 987 (1986).
cited Cited "see" Spruce v. Brown
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 (1986). 5 Upon consideration, we conclude that plaintiff's complaint was timely.
cited Cited "see" Donald Kent Ray v. T.E. Judd, Major Jenkins, Correctional Officer Bowger, Correctional Officer
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Jessie Berger v. Iron Workers Reinforced Rodmen Local 201, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, the court noted that “the International had not caused or participated in and did not approve the condition complained of.” Id. at 947; see Howard v. International Moulders & Allied Workers Union, 779 F.2d 1546 , 1548 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 987 (1986) (international liable where its representative “worked closely” with local negotiators, resulting in discriminatory bargaining agreement); accord Sagers v. Yellow Freight Sys., 529 F.2d 721, 737-38 (5th Cir.1976); see also Kaplan v. International Alliance of Theatrical & Stage Employee…
discussed Cited "see" James L. McCune v. The City of Grand Rapids, a Municipal Corporation Francis Pierce Gerald Steele John Doe and Richard Roe (2×)
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986). 29 I would suggest that the rule the court applies in this case simply will not suffice.
discussed Cited "see" Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of Oklahoma
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 , 343-44 & n. 4 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986); Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 , 919 n. 6, 920 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1065 , 106 S.Ct. 1378 , 89 L.Ed.2d 603 (1986); Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250, 1253-56 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); Cook v. City of Minneapolis, 617 F.Supp. 461, 463-65 (D.Minn.1985); compare Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 330 , 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986), wit…
discussed Cited "see" Williams v. District of Columbia
D.D.C. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986); Gates v. Spink, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1065 , 106 S.Ct. 1378 , 89 L.Ed.2d 603 (1986); Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Cochran v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Burke, 784 F.2d 1090, 1092-93 (11th Cir.), cert. den., 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2901 , 90 L.Ed.2d 987 (1986); United States v. Collins, 830 F.2d 145, 146 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tyson v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Grantham v. State , 580 So.2d 53 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991), after remand, 602 So.2d 1226 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992), aff'd, 613 So.2d 1260 (Ala. 1993), where this *Page 339 Court relied on United States v. Turner , 770 F.2d 1508 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1026 (1986), and United States v. Burke , 784 F.2d 1090 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 (1986), cited by the Helton Court.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ellis
11th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Burke, 784 F.2d 1090, 1092-93 (11th Cir.), cert. den., 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2901 , 90 L.Ed.2d 987 (1986); United States v. Collins, 830 F.2d 145, 146 (9th Cir.1987).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ellis
11th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Burke, 784 F.2d 1090, 1092-93 (11th Cir.), cert. den., 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2901 , 90 L.Ed.2d 987 (1986); United States v. Collins, 830 F.2d 145, 146 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Free v. Granger
unknown court · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250, 1256 (11th Cir.1985) (adopting the six year statute of limitations for trespass for all Section 1983 claims in Alabama), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); see also Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985) (favoring the Ohio statutes of limitations for libel, slander, and other intentional torts, while rejecting the statute of limitations for bodily injury), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986); Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.1985) (selecting the Mississippi statute of…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Free v. Granger
unknown court · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250, 1256 (11th Cir.1985) (adopting the six year statute of limitations for trespass for all Section 1983 claims in Alabama), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); see also Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985) (favoring the Ohio statutes of limitations for libel, slander, and other intentional torts, while rejecting the statute of limitations for bodily injury), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986); Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.1985) (selecting the Mississippi statute of…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Daniel Browning, D/B/A Daniel Browning Excavating Co. Linda Browning v. Craig R. Pendleton (2×)
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied 479 U.S. 923 , 107 S.Ct. 330 , 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986), with Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Linda Mulligan
v.
Francis Hazard
85-1641.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 19, 1986.
476 U.S. 1174
White, Marshall.
Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

See 478 U.S. 1031, 107 S.Ct. 12.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice WHITE, with whom Justice MARSHALL joins, dissenting.

Lead Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Dissent

Justice White, with whom Justice Marshall joins,

dissenting.

In Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U. S. 261 (1985), we held that an action brought under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 should be considered a personal injury action for purposes of borrowing an appropriate state statute of limitations. Since our decision in that case, the Courts of Appeals have differed on whether Wilson should be given retro[*1175] active effect. In the present case, the Sixth Circuit held, without qualification, that Wilson should be given retroactive effect. 777 F. 2d 340 (1985). The Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits have reached similar results. Gates v. Spinks, 771 F. 2d 916 (CA5 1985), cert. denied, 475 U. S. 1065 (1986); Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F. 2d 1250 (CA11 1985), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1105 (1986). Two other Courts of Appeals, however, have determined that when retroactive application would shorten the statute of limitations, Wilson merits only prospective relief. Gibson v. United States, 781 F. 2d 1334 (CA9 1986); Jackson v. City of Bloomfield, 731 F. 2d 652 (CA10 1984). Although the Third and Eighth Circuits have applied Wilson retroactively in certain cases, it is unclear whether their holdings are designed to have universal application. See Wycoff v. Menke, 773 F. 2d 983, 986-987 (CA8 1985); Fitzgerald v. Larson, 769 F. 2d 160, 162-164 (CA3 1985); Smith v. City of Pittsburgh, 764 F. 2d 188, 194-196 (CA3 1985).

In addition, the Courts of Appeals also have reached conflicting results concerning what should be done when more than one state statute of limitations applies to personal injury actions. In Hamilton v. City of Overton Park, 730 F. 2d 613 (1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 471 U. S. 1052 (1985), and Mismash v. Murray City, 730 F. 2d 1366 (1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 471 U. S. 1052 (1985), the Tenth Circuit rejected, for § 1983 purposes, the state statute of limitations for intentional torts, and chose instead a State’s residual statute of limitations. See generally Preuit & Mauldin v. Jones, 474 U. S. 1105, 1106-1107 (1986) (White, J. dissenting from denial of certiorari). The Eleventh Circuit in Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, supra, the Fifth Circuit in Gates v. Spinks, supra, and the Sixth Circuit in the present case, however, follow a different rule, and select the state statute of limitations governing intentional torts.

The Court’s decision not to review the instant case marks the third time this Term that it has refused to address these differences that exist between the Courts of Appeals; differences that are not likely to disappear without guidance from this Court. Given the square conflicts among the Circuits, and the frequency with which these cases arise, I would grant the petition for certiorari in this case.