green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 5×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…unless can establish that he suffered actual injury due to the failure to hold a pretermination name clearing hearing, we think an award of anything but nominal damages would be a windfall, not compensation.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Frazier v. Ford Motor Co.
there may arise instances where the employee's conduct in protest of an unlawful employment practice so interferes with the performance of his job that it renders him ineffective ...
discussed
Cited "but see"
Nelson v. Pima Community College
But see Holden v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 793 F.2d 745, 749 (6th Cir.1986) (opposition to affirmative actions programs not protected under § 2000e-3(a), because Title YII does not mandate implementation of affirmative action programs), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 649 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Nelson v. Pima Community College
But see Holden v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 793 F.2d 745, 749 (6th Cir.1986) (opposition to affirmative actions programs not protected under § 2000e-3(a), because Title VII does not mandate implementation of affirmative action programs), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 649 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Stahl v. Tony's Building Materials, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see, e.g., Cummings v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383, 387 (7th Cir.) (summary plan description met ERISA’s disclosure requirements and there was no duty to individually warn plan participants or beneficiaries), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Retirement Plan, 480 F.Supp. 848, 851-52 (E.D.Penn.1979) af f'd 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir.1980) (since summary plan description clearly warned employees of 30-day waiting period for election of benefits, and since there was no indication that Congress intended to impose an…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Richard Stahl v. Tony's Building Materials, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see, e.g., Cummings v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383, 387 (7th Cir.) (summary plan description met ERISA's disclosure requirements and there was no duty to individually warn plan participants or beneficiaries), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Retirement Plan, 480 F.Supp. 848, 851-52 (E.D.Penn.1979) aff'd 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir.1980) (since summary plan description clearly warned employees of 30-day waiting period for election of benefits, and since there was no indication that Congress intended to impose any f…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Charlesworth R. Martin v. Theodore Thomas, Milo K. Shepard, Robert L. Prater and L.L. Clarkson
pjendent jurisdiction may not override the eleventh amendment
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Martin v. Thomas
endent jurisdiction may not override the eleventh amendment
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brewer v. Chauvin
unless can establish that he suffered actual injury due to the failure to hold a pretermination name clearing hearing, we think an award of anything but nominal damages would be a windfall, not compensation.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brewer v. Chauvin
unless can establish that he suffered actual injury due to the failure to hold a pretermination name clearing hearing, we think an award of anything but nominal damages would be a windfall, not compensation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp.
See Waller, 906 F.2d at 992 (citing Cummings By Techmeier v. Briggs & Stratton, 797 F.2d 383 , 390 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986), and Van Orman v. American Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chojnacki v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
See Cummings v. Briggs & Stratton, 797 F.2d 383 , 387 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); accord Childers v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 688 F.Supp. 1357, 1361 (D.Minn.1988) (stating that ERISA “does not impose a fiduciary duty to provide individualized notice of the effect a particular event may have on a participant or beneficiary’s eligibility to receive benefits”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chojnacki v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation
See Cummings v. Briggs & Stratton, 797 F.2d 383 , 387 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); accord Childers v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 688 F.Supp. 1357, 1361 (D.Minn.1988) (stating that ERISA "does not impose a fiduciary duty to provide individualized notice of the effect a particular event may have on a participant or beneficiary's eligibility to receive benefits").
discussed
Cited "see"
38 soc.sec.rep.ser. 383, 15 Employee Benefits Cas. 2177, Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 40,728 James Maxa, as the Personal Representative for the Estate of Neil Maxa v. John Alden Life Insurance Company
See Cummings v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383, 387 (7th Cir.) (summary plan description met ERISA's disclosure requirements and there was no duty to individually warn plan participants or beneficiaries), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Retirement Plan, 480 F.Supp. 848, 851-52 (E.D.Pa.1979) (since summary plan description clearly warned employees of thirty-day waiting period for election of benefits, and since there was no indication that Congress intended to impose any further duties on plan fiduciaries, trustee…
discussed
Cited "see"
Maxa ex rel. Estate of Maxa v. John Alden Life Insurance
See Cummings v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383, 387 (7th Cir.) (summary plan description met ERISA’s disclosure requirements and there was no duty to individually warn plan participants or beneficiaries), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Re tirement Plan, 480 F.Supp. 848, 851-52 (E.D.Pa.1979) (since summary plan description clearly warned employees of thirty-day waiting period for election of benefits, and since there was no indication that Congress intended to impose any further duties on plan fiduciaries, trus…
cited
Cited "see"
Anweiler v. American Electric Power Service Corp.
See Cummins v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986). 29 U.S.C. § 1104 .
cited
Cited "see"
Mildred A. Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See Holden v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 793 F.2d 745, 746 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 649 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
MacDonald v. United States
See Go-Tane Service Stations v. Clark Oil & Refining, 798 F.2d 481, 491 (Em.App.1986) cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986); Stich v. United States, 730 F.2d 115 (3d Cir.1984) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Winter v. Cerro Gordo County Conservation Board
See Hogue v. Clinton, 791 F.2d 1318, 1326-27 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986) (Lay, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
discussed
Cited "see"
Steven J. Winter v. Cerro Gordo County Conservation Board, Ben Van Gundy And, Ronald Masters (Two Cases). Steven J. Winter v. Cerro Gordo County Conservation Board, Ben Van Gundy And, Ronald Masters (Two Cases)
See Hogue v. Clinton, 791 F.2d 1318, 1326-27 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986) (Lay, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) However, we have recently affirmed a damage award as an equitable measure to equate "back pay." See Brewer v. Parkman, 918 F.2d 1336 (8th Cir.), vacated and rehearing en banc granted, 89-2980 (8th Cir. Dec. 28, 1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley Bokunewicz and Joseph Bell v. Purolator Products, Inc. Appeal of Purolator Products, Inc. Appeal of Stanley Bokunewicz and Joseph Bell
(2×)
Opinion of June 20, 1989, at 14-15; see Daigle v. Gulf State Utilities Co., Local No. 2286, 794 F.2d 974, 977 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth G. Hicks, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brown Group, Inc., D/B/A Brown Shoe Company, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
See Hogue v. Clinton, 791 F.2d 1318, 1323 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986). 75 Relying on Carey, we held in Edwards that the Section 1981 right to be free from discrimination is absolute and proof of its violation entitles the plaintiff to nominal damages. 855 F.2d at 1350 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Varnado v. Roadway Exp.
See Del Costello v. Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 , 103 S.Ct. 2281 , 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), and Daigle v. Gulf States Utilities, 794 F.2d 974, 977 (5th Cir.1986), writ denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Barbara and Christopher Schultz, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Daughter, Rachel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Hart Schaffner & Marx, (Hartmarx Corporation), and Barbara Schultz/christopher Schultz, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Daughter, Rachel Schultz v. Hart Schaffner & Marx Subsidiary and Affiliated Companies Group Life Insurance and Medical Plan (The Plan), Hart Schaffner & Marx
See Cummings by Techmeier v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383, 387 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Schultz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
See Cummings by Techmeier v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383, 387 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin Oil Service, Inc. v. Koch Refining Co.
See generally Go-Tane Service Stations v. Clark Oil & Refining, 798 F.2d 481, 485 (TECA 1986) (“Although Johnson did not refer to ‘plain overcharges,’ our subsequent decisions employed the term to distinguish Johnson"), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Philip Stanfield v. Shellmaker, Inc.
Indeed, we have defined a navigable waterway as one “used or susceptible of being used as an artery of commerce____ Commerce for the purpose of admiralty jurisdiction means activities related to the business of shipping.” Adams v. Montana Power Co., 528 F.2d 437, 439 (9th Cir.1975); see Complaint of Paradise Holdings, Inc., 795 F.2d 756, 759 (9th Cir.1986) (reaffirming Adams rule), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 649 , 93 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986); Chapman v. United States, 575 F.2d 147, 149-51 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (adopting Adams rule), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893 , 99 S.Ct. 251 , 58 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sawicki v. American Plastic Toys, Inc.
See, e.g., Holden v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 793 F.2d 745, 751-52 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 649 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986), Unt v. Aerospace Corp., 765 F.2d 1440, 1446 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
IBP, Inc. v. Foust
Compare Cummings v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383, 390 (7th Cir.) (courts should only invoke federal common law of unjust enrichment in “limited circumstances”), cer t. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986) and Van Orman, 680 F.2d at 312 (no federal common law cause of action under doctrine of unjust enrichment when “such a right would override a contractual provision”), and Amato v. Western Union Int'l, 773 F.2d 1402 (2d Cir.1985) (no ERISA common law of unjust enrichment in “circumstances of this case”), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 1…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. Batchik
See also Daigle v. Gulf State Utilities Co., Local No. 2286, 794 F.2d 974, 979 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shah v. State Board of Medicine
See also Hogue v. Clinton, 791 F.2d 1318, 1324 (8th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of the Complaint of Everett A. Sisson, as Owner of the Motor Yacht, the Ultorian, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability
(4×)
See, e.g., In re Paradise Holdings, Inc., 795 F.2d 756 , 758-60 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 649 , 93 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986); Duluth Superior Excursions, Inc. v. Makela, 623 F.2d 1251, 1252-54 (8th Cir.1980); In re Brown, 536 F.Supp. 750, 751-52 (N.D.Ohio 1982); Clinton Bd. of Park Comm’rs v. Claussen, 410 F.Supp. 320, 323-26 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Demetrius P. Traggis v. St. Barbara's Greek Orthodox Church
See also Daigle v. Gulf State Utils., 794 F.2d 974, 979 (5th Cir.) (no need to decide issue on facts of case), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986); Kinniburgh v. Burlington Northern R.R., 568 F.Supp. 655, 656-67 (D.Mont.1983) (district judge stating that he was “unable to reconcile the concepts inherent in Reichardt and Novotny ”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
Brown
v.
Brown
No. 86-615.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1986.
Cited by 37 opinions | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.