green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Subpoena to Testify Before Grand Jury Directed to Custodian of Records, University of Florida Athletic Program. The Gainesville Sun Publishing Corporation, the Tribune Company, Campus Communications, Inc., and the University of Florida Chapter of Sigma Delta Chi, Intervenors-Appellants
(2×)
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 797 F.2d 676 (8th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 661 , 93 L.Ed.2d 714 (1986). 6 The United States argues that the press has no standing because this case involves a grand jury proceeding and the press does not have access to such proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Subpoena to Testify Before Grand Jury Directed to Custodian of Records
(2×)
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 797 F.2d 676 (8th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 661 , 93 L.Ed.2d 714 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 797 F.2d 676, 680 (8th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 661 , 93 L.Ed.2d 714 (1986); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 575 F.Supp. 93, 94 (S.D.N.Y.1983). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 797 F.2d 676, 680 (8th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 661 , 93 L.Ed.2d 714 (1986); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 575 F.Supp. 93, 94 (S.D.N.Y.1983); see also Matter of Grand Jury Applications for Court-Ordered Subpoenas and Nondisclosure Orders — December 1988 Term, 142 Misc.2d 241, 248 , 536 N.Y.S.2d 939, 943 (Sup.Ct.1988) (searching for such authority under New York law). 9 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gambrell
v.
Ackerman, Judge
v.
Ackerman, Judge
No. 86-5003.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1986.
Consideration, Took.
Published
ante, p. 855. Petition for rehearing denied.
Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.